i cant
Also would you look at that. Bursts of 2-5 rounds… Just like I said.
1 Like
Google lets you search by image, might help
1 Like
where has it been debunked?
Please just read the thread. I was wrong on LMURs. Kh-38 idk, i have only the soviet ground (not-so)top-tier, so i’ve never really experienced playing aganist them, but like not replying would be impolite. Tank armor is a much more complicated topic, i don’t really want to debate anything, as @Metaltank1990 will continue to “nuh uh” and “i don’t feel like it” to every argument while making up the most outrageously untruthful claims one can only see in places like reddit. Have a good day.
1 Like
If that wasn’t obvious enough.
lol
These don’t debunk the function of the site, they only state (correctly) that it’s bad for the game’s health by causing unnecessary toxicity.
1 Like
Wow, what a source. Some guy found the photo online and wrote about that in his blog. Then some other dude quoted him on a military-themed blog site. Wow.
the one above says its un accurate
i mean, it is infinitely more of a source than you saying “bro look its coming from the opposite way”.
I’ll watch it and get back to you on that one, cheers.
1 Like
Ahahahaha, dude your head is designed to think, not to just eat. Stop believing everything you like or want to be true.
seeing absolutely everything that you posted here in the thread, and seeing that the dude above literally has shown you how you can nicely see the pattern on top of the fact that the 2A42 lacks any form of additional structural stabilizers or fasteners to prevent the recoil and is known to fly all over the place, i think its safe to say that the one who should start thinking and stop blindly believing everything he reads on the internet is you.
2 Likes
Inaccurate in what way? You mean the rating they made?
Yeah I don’t need to use that. I look at games played, winrate, kills, deaths and spawns. All of those are pretty accurate since statshark just pulls them from the game or API or whatever the name is.
I did after an image was provided.
Gone through the transcript and looked at anything that appeared to be of note, I still can’t find any mention of its accuracy. It appears to be another (again very valid) complaint about the site actively encouraging toxicity just by existing.
3 Likes
is known
Trust me bro
What are you even on about? If you don’t have anything of significance, just don’t reply.
if you cant look at a video evidence, a real life live fire video evidence of a cannon and willingly ignore VISIBLE wobble during extremely short bursts, you should simply just not be here.
Youre living in a imaginary world that doesnt follow basic principles of logic. Especially after multitude of people have told you otherwise you are pulling a petulent 5 year old act of stubbornness trying to disprove shit others have literally shown you.
The problem lies with you friendo, not with the people trying to explain to you something you actively choose to ignore.
Dont even bother replying, because unlike you I know that you wont have anything of significance to say.
6 Likes
I watched the above video and it doesn’t talk about the accuracy or reliability of statshark at all.
The whole video is about: 1) the live match viewer and it’s possibly negative effects on the community and 2) about the statshark dev that turned out to be a hacker and did some messed up stuff.
2 Likes