Sure man, I’m 253% sure the trend will be more in favor of NATO as soon as I play more games than the hundreds I already played
Plot twist : no it won’t
EDIT : the only reason NATO winrates go a little bit higher (thus Russia winrates a little bit lower) is because NATO is sometimes teamed up with Russia. Also, the other reason Russia winrates go a little bit lower, is because they sometimes fight China (which is +/- Russia in terms of strenght, so they suffer a bit fighting them).
But in general, if NATO only fight against Russia and China, the winrates plummet. I don’t even wanna talk about Russia + China + Germany + Sweeden vs the reste of NATO nations.
They should constantly team up every NATO nations all together, including Germany and Sweeden (vs Russia + China). That’s the only chance for NATO to remain competitive at top tiers.
RU does, and that is because the game’s players aren’t distributed normally, this ain’t high school maths, most players live beneath the ‘average’ line which sure is counterintuitive but is the truth, that’s why Russian vehicles perform better.
Those are rigged numbers favorizing Russia to hide the bias, everybody knows it. Bet the winrates won’t change at 13.0, even after the addition of the new pantsir + turret baskets for all NATO MBTs now + LMURs spam.
China has t-series MBTs as well, Russia suffers against them (as much as NATO do against t-series in general).
Clearly claimed RU vehicle are better for lower skill or outright dogshit player
Claiming the MM is not based on skill or stats and it is randomly distributed which is true
Still somehow boiled his word down to “West = shit, East = good”
Which considering the majority of West force is majority consist of US/GER/Swed. Two of them being major and have an actually good lineup of premium at top tier. Which are constantly the best seller every sale season. Sure , it is definitely not because of the player. Always the tank
The topic is about Russian top tier, no? SB and RB have exactly the same vehicles.
The Russian lineup is overperforming due to CAS. It’s true in RB, it’s simply more visible in SB because of CAS first spawn and fixed teams.
Russian winrate is diluted in RB because it’s mixed teams. I would be willing to bet that fixed full Russian team in RB top tier would see much higher winrate than what they have now, similar to SB.
Which is not what I said. If u wish to put your incompetence down to this level I am fine with that. What I said was that the Russian vehicles tend to be more friendly for worse players, whilst they have worse ceilings than their counterparts.
NATO in ground RB has more of a chance than NATO in sim.
NATO generally has superior tanks, so there is a good chance for them to use that and prevent a lot of Russian players from even spawning in CAS. However in sim Russia can instantly spawn their CAS and dominate.
NO,As far as I know, China’s top military strength is second only to that of Russia. They have been greatly enhanced in the recent period. If China always sides with Russia, the result can be seen simulation battle
OK. Although there is a gap between SB and RB, I think everyone understands that a 70% winning rate is extremely unbalanced compared to a 30% winning rate RIGHT?
Yeah, I can agree with that. Most matches I win as NATO is due to Russia being unable to spawn their CAS. The moment that happens, it’s an uphill battle if they’re not instantly removed.
The biggest difference really is that one gamemode can first spawn CAS, the other cannot + the SP system. The Russian CAS is just as broken in RB than it is in Sim. It’s just harder to spawn it in RB/super visible in Sim.
This is not only just.
People need to jump through multiple hoops in order to get it, while in SB every single player has access to CAS with a single button press.
