TLDR, remove those matches and RU still lead by a margin.
1 Like
Premium vehicles don’t really perform worse than their TT copies.
2 Likes
Hills are in favor of Russian tanks now ?
I have to remember that next time i try to peak one with 5 degree gun depression.
7 Likes
It does? Said protection was achieved based on BMVg’s testings.
You’re coping.
2 Likes
who are affiliate AF and basically create an advertisment material. Lol. You`ll be the first one to say “Its not proven because NII STALI tells lies!!!” if we reverse that
Sure, if you also remove any losses caused by similar matches on the NATO side.
SB and not RB but as I said before, Statshark 74% winrate for RU/CHI after LMUR release in october 2025. Steady ~64% winrate since then. So we’re not far from his doomsday scenario of 70%+ winrate for RU
RU CAS is overperforming, I don’t understand why people keep defending this situation so hard.
1 Like
Yes, both sides and RU still lead
1 Like
This topic is about RB.
1 Like
Thats the point…russians never peaked even when map wasnt altered because back in the days only Leos and Co. had enough gun depression and now only tanks like TKX with adjustble suspension have a chance but even them not very often. Thing is the strategy and tactics are still the same of russian tank drivers but now the maps prevent sniping them or flanking because everyone has to be in the ditches now. I can realy imagin there is people playing the game and have a big influence to the game designers and were crying about " Remove that hill on map XXXXX at grid A6 because they allways snipe from there" or “Put bushes at the corner at B5 on map XXXXX near the building because they allways ambush us from there” or like “Remove the area at the egde on map XXXXX at G2 because they allways flank from there” and “Please more hills we need cover” and so on and so on. This is exactly the pattern of the map progression in the last years!
1 Like
Sure man, I’m 253% sure the trend will be more in favor of NATO as soon as I play more games than the hundreds I already played
Plot twist : no it won’t
EDIT : the only reason NATO winrates go a little bit higher (thus Russia winrates a little bit lower) is because NATO is sometimes teamed up with Russia. Also, the other reason Russia winrates go a little bit lower, is because they sometimes fight China (which is +/- Russia in terms of strenght, so they suffer a bit fighting them).
But in general, if NATO only fight against Russia and China, the winrates plummet. I don’t even wanna talk about Russia + China + Germany + Sweeden vs the reste of NATO nations.
They should constantly team up every NATO nations all together, including Germany and Sweeden (vs Russia + China). That’s the only chance for NATO to remain competitive at top tiers.
1 Like
I’m more inclined to believe SS’ millions of games than your 100-200.
Sorry.
What Chinese vehicles are making RU suffer ?
1 Like
No he’s right.
SM = eastern vehicles VS western vehicles ONLY.
And when you’re watching eastern vehicles vs western vehicles fighting, you notice the blatant bias. 70% winrate for the east, that’s what it is.
RU does, and that is because the game’s players aren’t distributed normally, this ain’t high school maths, most players live beneath the ‘average’ line which sure is counterintuitive but is the truth, that’s why Russian vehicles perform better.
1 Like
Those are rigged numbers favorizing Russia to hide the bias, everybody knows it. Bet the winrates won’t change at 13.0, even after the addition of the new pantsir + turret baskets for all NATO MBTs now + LMURs spam.
China has t-series MBTs as well, Russia suffers against them (as much as NATO do against t-series in general).
Sure, so there is no russian bias, it’s just because all western players are bad, and all russian + chinese players are good.
West = poo, east = the greatest
Damn, it was that easy from the beginning
1 Like
No he isn’t, SB is vastly different than RB.
Rigged numbers from a site that doesn’t hide 65-70% WR for RU/CN in SB.
Interesting.
This implies T-series tanks are the best tanks in the game, which they aren’t.
2 Likes
Clearly claimed RU vehicle are better for lower skill or outright dogshit player
Claiming the MM is not based on skill or stats and it is randomly distributed which is true
Still somehow boiled his word down to “West = shit, East = good”
Which considering the majority of West force is majority consist of US/GER/Swed. Two of them being major and have an actually good lineup of premium at top tier. Which are constantly the best seller every sale season. Sure , it is definitely not because of the player. Always the tank
The topic is about Russian top tier, no? SB and RB have exactly the same vehicles.
The Russian lineup is overperforming due to CAS. It’s true in RB, it’s simply more visible in SB because of CAS first spawn and fixed teams.
Russian winrate is diluted in RB because it’s mixed teams. I would be willing to bet that fixed full Russian team in RB top tier would see much higher winrate than what they have now, similar to SB.
1 Like
