I wouldn’t have chosen a WW2 filler from 2014 for my argument but ok. Then we can get the inner pylon amraams for the typhoon, because specific proof doesn’t matter?
True, which i btw also don’t agree with however I feel like specific mp heights and seeker performance is a different level than simple maneuverability
That one:
T-72 (all variants), T-80 (all variants), T-90 (all variants), ZTZ96 (all variants), ZTZ99 (all variants), WZ1001(E) LCT, VT4A1, MBT-2000, Al-Khalid-I — new FCS (fire control system) modules have been added, trunnions have been added. Destruction of these modules on these tanks doesn’t yet affect the function of the tank systems, just as on other MBTs in the game currently. Later, after these modules have been added to the majority of MBTs in the game, their functionality will be enabled for all at once.
11 years is more than enough to fill that gap with something. The fact it’s still going around in matches like that in late 2025 tells you everything.
I mean, quote Kikka as it had set the precedent and if your suggestion gets denied you can easily blame Japan favoritism.
Also, I believe all top tier ARHs share the same seeker, excluding MICA which is a shocker, right ?
Just like they didn’t want to fiddle with those things, they thought getting more performance out of AA systems at those tiers isn’t necessary.
Gaijin actually learning, impressive.
Doesn’t change the fact Leclercs dodged turret baskets for reasons.
Like I said ww2 stuff from 11 years ago is not the best comparison especially since gaijin is always creative when it comes to weaponry on prototypes like the Yak 141.
that was not their reasoning. 2. what does necessary have to do with anything? Either it’s realistic or it’s not. Having same seekers for simplicity and due to heavy classification is not the same as gimping the maneuverability of a missile, because the other looks similar so it can’t be true
Yeah maybe they could remove the other stuff then if they acknowledge that it’s not fair?
Gaijin: hey, we are a business entity, not a charity, you want to unlock more content? Either you pay for the extras, or the bare minimum you make yourself available for the matchmaking, do the latter enough then you can have that vehicle!
Wanna buy new sports cars every year and recently the boss started seeing this chick who is a solid 9.5, wanna buy her a Porsche during valentine’s day as a gift bro this will definitely set him back a little.
This is perfectly normal bro, who else would be stupid enough to turned down an opportunity to make money? remember you gain advantage at another’s disadvantage, C-a-p-i-t-a-l-i-z-e…
Not trying to be biased, if you’re going to include next-generation tech demonstrator or production units, even prototypes, I personally think that USSR with Russia and luckly with any other ex-sovietic republic will always be a step further in this regard, although T-14 Armata is a bad apple.
As I said, something being WW2 or not, or being added 11 or 110 years ago doesn’t really matter if it still exists in 2025. That thing is most likely a precedent for what you’re upset about, so referring to that is your best bet if you want to give EFT additional missiles.
Don’t worry, I saw the documents and nowhere in there it was explicitly stated the G load was either average or maximum.
Then you’ll have a problem with ammo choices and reload speed being changed for balancing.
If they wanted to keep seekers the same because of heavy classifications, why did they change the seeker for MICA ?
No it’s not. Prototypes getting their planned and reasonable weapons is fine by me. In service planes having double standards when it comes to what weapons are integrated is not.
I do but I also recognize that reload is the best thing for balance since especially manual reload will vary wildly based on different circumstances so it’s still a very different situation
Genuinely no idea but with the speed by which Rafale bug reports get worked on and the constant buffs despite already being the best jet I’m almost certain that Dassault has Gaijins CEO locked up in a basement somewhere