I never claimed to be a pro-player, what are you going on about?
Okay you’re just trying to be emotionally manipulative for the sake of arguing. The original topic of the thread is long over at this point.
SACLOS AAs were a thing for many, many years.
Stats paint a completely different picture I’m afraid.
Doesn’t have the best MBT, light tank or jet while having competitive AA and helicopters.
Pretty good ? Yes.
The best ? Not really.
You’re targeting 38MT because you believe it’s fake but guess what, fakes are a thing in this game, right ?
I won’t comment on Soyuz as it’s a part of a dead mode.
Gaijin made up their mind regarding Igla vs Stinger and fairly placed those vehicles, BR wise.
I doubt you’d like to play with vehicles that have buffed up Stingers.
Like ?
1 Like
Not just that its fake but also that it just shouldnt be on the SU30SM according to Gaijins own rules regarding addition of weapons to specific types of aircraft.
Yep im sure thats the reason why youre not commenting on that one…
Doesnt matter what id like to play. Completely ignoring a weapons real life capabilities to bring it on the same level as a corresponding weapon from another tree completely undermines the spirit of the game. If they do that then why dont we all just play the same vehicles with different skins? That would be a super balanced and fair experience but its hardly what we want, is it?
Turret baskets only for the Abrams and Leo, Half added Stabilizer restriction for the Leo and now the addition modules to some tanks that are non functional, because it would be unfair if realism only affected some tanks negatively
If Kikka can keep it’s guns then I don’t see a problem in anything else.
I’m also for 30SM not having access to KH-38s, but for different reasons.
It is, I don’t play that dead mode and have no idea what’s going on there.
Not like I care in the first place.
That’s already happening with many things in the game.
Just look at IR seekers and MP height for different missiles.
Like ?
I blame French favoritism for that.
1 Like
I wouldn’t have chosen a WW2 filler from 2014 for my argument but ok. Then we can get the inner pylon amraams for the typhoon, because specific proof doesn’t matter?
True, which i btw also don’t agree with however I feel like specific mp heights and seeker performance is a different level than simple maneuverability
That one:
- T-72 (all variants), T-80 (all variants), T-90 (all variants), ZTZ96 (all variants), ZTZ99 (all variants), WZ1001(E) LCT, VT4A1, MBT-2000, Al-Khalid-I — new FCS (fire control system) modules have been added, trunnions have been added. Destruction of these modules on these tanks doesn’t yet affect the function of the tank systems, just as on other MBTs in the game currently. Later, after these modules have been added to the majority of MBTs in the game, their functionality will be enabled for all at once.
Valid. But the frenchies do have Leos as well
11 years is more than enough to fill that gap with something. The fact it’s still going around in matches like that in late 2025 tells you everything.
I mean, quote Kikka as it had set the precedent and if your suggestion gets denied you can easily blame Japan favoritism.
Also, I believe all top tier ARHs share the same seeker, excluding MICA which is a shocker, right ?
Just like they didn’t want to fiddle with those things, they thought getting more performance out of AA systems at those tiers isn’t necessary.
Gaijin actually learning, impressive.
Doesn’t change the fact Leclercs dodged turret baskets for reasons.
1 Like
Like I said ww2 stuff from 11 years ago is not the best comparison especially since gaijin is always creative when it comes to weaponry on prototypes like the Yak 141.
- that was not their reasoning. 2. what does necessary have to do with anything? Either it’s realistic or it’s not. Having same seekers for simplicity and due to heavy classification is not the same as gimping the maneuverability of a missile, because the other looks similar so it can’t be true
Yeah maybe they could remove the other stuff then if they acknowledge that it’s not fair?
The dude has a 1.4 K/D last month. So a 5 kill average feels fishy.
2 Likes
Why do you need to unlock more vehicles anyway? Can’t you continue to play what you already researched and spaded?
Because I wanna use modern tanks.
Gaijin: hey, we are a business entity, not a charity, you want to unlock more content? Either you pay for the extras, or the bare minimum you make yourself available for the matchmaking, do the latter enough then you can have that vehicle!
Nobody here has ever asked Gaijin to give stuff away without effort or for free, we’ve just asked for it to be less obtuse.
Wanna buy new sports cars every year and recently the boss started seeing this chick who is a solid 9.5, wanna buy her a Porsche during valentine’s day as a gift bro this will definitely set him back a little.
Is nobody here normal?
This is perfectly normal bro, who else would be stupid enough to turned down an opportunity to make money? remember you gain advantage at another’s disadvantage, C-a-p-i-t-a-l-i-z-e…
I mean it’s hard to stay serious around someone who convinced themselfs that the US is a bad tree.
Not trying to be biased, if you’re going to include next-generation tech demonstrator or production units, even prototypes, I personally think that USSR with Russia and luckly with any other ex-sovietic republic will always be a step further in this regard, although T-14 Armata is a bad apple.
but I can’t believe it on this is real data 60% min vs russia loser maches and hes have lower winrate?