Yes, this is really sad.
Add to that new pantsir with a missiles that penetration increases with distance… ;)
Why is despite what Russia gets, the nato players always complain about something Russian. It’s a joke as old as time.
The new pansir isn’t going to kill anyone unless they’re 1200+ meters away.
Well you cant really complain about a NATO addition if they dont get anything
Isn’t the USA getting like 6 vehicles this update? Japan’s getting 3-4?
What new levels of bias have you achieved?
US is getting 3, Russia is getting 3.
That’s my point though. Everyone gets something. I don’t see why people complain every update.
Was just pointing out the numbers.
I only glimpsed over TECs cus about the dev stream. A lot of them looked USA based.
I wasn’t trying to be accurate
Ok let me rephrase: Cant really complain about anything NATO if the stuff they get is so terrible that youd rather pity them than complain
Its not like anyone is complaining about the Mig29
That’s a terrible take.
I love the Stryker.
And there’s nothing worse than getting another MiG-29 to research… all for R-73s…
1 Like
How is it a terrible take? Why would you be complaining about something thats just not good?
Or not noteworthy at least
2 Likes
Typically most additions are good. The ones I disagree with are base models that could just be simply changed using upgrade packages.
Good example: T-80B, becomes the Bv with the upgrade package.
Having to research a whole new vehicle for 1 modification is a bit silly.
1 Like
Agreed. That however still doesnt answer why anyone would complain about NATO additions this update since they are all very meh.
exactly… russians ger yet another pantsir they still have op 38’s missiles they have properly implemented LMURS while nato still has bad flight model of hellfires/jagms… half their possibilities are nerfed because of “balance”
Kh38MT vs AGM65G
47 cruise missiles vs 1 janitor?
2 Likes
holy cook
Shot far too low. Lol.
Actually, i’m gonna be petty and say that the T-80B we have in game isn’t actually a BV, even with the mod that makes it a “BV”. It retains the old crappy composite layout, just with K1 plastered over it. To see BV UFP protection, look at Object 292.
1 Like
The M1296 doesn’t even have it’s proper (DU) APFSDS XM1170, let alone the export Tungsten variant NG1170W. But has Mk.258 mod 0 (at the moment) for some reason which it doesn’t use since that’s a Navy round, nor is it cleared for use in the Mark 44S that the XM813 is based off.
Or the Mk 310 PABM Airburst (AHEAD) round to actually provide some sort of gun based proximity ordnance & drone interception capability to the US tree.
2 Likes