Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

Just for the record, the screenshots themself are from the Community Development Kits’ (CDK) Assetviewer thus not datamined per se as its an official tool provided by gaijin.

Technically speaking, you can also use nvidia ansel (which some of the pictures were made with btw) to look inside the vehicle ingame to see armour values and types (just that its really and I mean really annoying to get that thing to actually show armour-info).

However, for checking whether a plate actually creates spall and to check how thick a specific plate is/what exact armour type it uses, datamined values are ofc much more convenient and imo just as, if not more reliable (datamines are literally our changelogs atp).

Nevertheless, they’re still not visible though “normal means” and not available to any player Independent from their their platform and thus reasonable to be considered as hidden.
(e.g. console players cant use the CDK, AMD or Intel GPU users cant use nvidia ansel etc.)

2 Likes

I appreciate the breakdown. Regardless, gaijin is dpong something that is INCREDIBLY deceptive and they’re gaslighting a huge chunk of their player base.

Its kind of messed up.

Yes, this is really sad.

Add to that new pantsir with a missiles that penetration increases with distance… ;)

Why is despite what Russia gets, the nato players always complain about something Russian. It’s a joke as old as time.

The new pansir isn’t going to kill anyone unless they’re 1200+ meters away.

Well you cant really complain about a NATO addition if they dont get anything

Isn’t the USA getting like 6 vehicles this update? Japan’s getting 3-4?

What new levels of bias have you achieved?

US is getting 3, Russia is getting 3.

That’s my point though. Everyone gets something. I don’t see why people complain every update.

Was just pointing out the numbers.

I only glimpsed over TECs cus about the dev stream. A lot of them looked USA based.

I wasn’t trying to be accurate

Ok let me rephrase: Cant really complain about anything NATO if the stuff they get is so terrible that youd rather pity them than complain
Its not like anyone is complaining about the Mig29

That’s a terrible take.

I love the Stryker.

And there’s nothing worse than getting another MiG-29 to research… all for R-73s…

1 Like

How is it a terrible take? Why would you be complaining about something thats just not good?
Or not noteworthy at least

2 Likes

Typically most additions are good. The ones I disagree with are base models that could just be simply changed using upgrade packages.

Good example: T-80B, becomes the Bv with the upgrade package.

Having to research a whole new vehicle for 1 modification is a bit silly.

1 Like

Agreed. That however still doesnt answer why anyone would complain about NATO additions this update since they are all very meh.

exactly… russians ger yet another pantsir they still have op 38’s missiles they have properly implemented LMURS while nato still has bad flight model of hellfires/jagms… half their possibilities are nerfed because of “balance”

Kh38MT vs AGM65G

47 cruise missiles vs 1 janitor?

2 Likes

holy cook

Shot far too low. Lol.