Air to air ≠ ATGM.
Does that require something special on the pylon?
Different wiring.
On expo any weapon can be attached on any pylon – it’s simple demonstration. This doesn’t mean that Mi-28NM can use that configuration.
huh, now im even more interested.
While i do agree, they not only winged it, but said it can use them. At least to the news outlet.
Rafale F3 with additional pylon from R4.
Su-27/30 with double R-77 pylon from Su-35 (which cannot be installed on 27/30).
Gaijin do that they want.
5 Likes
They also tried to limit JAGM to 8
Technically speaking additional pylons tested on F3 airframe so its more real than double pylons on Su-27SM/30SM.
I still have to find a really great ground vehicle that’s allegedly grossly undertiered to perform like crap though.
Source: Trust me bro
1 Like
Source: brochure and booklets.
Show me video/photo there’s Mi-28NM use 8 LMUR in combat configuration.
1 Like
There are no public photos or information of Mi-28NM loading 8x LMUR air-to-ground missiles. The closest for that number is 4x ordinances in total loaded into double pylons (1 and 4). In furthermore Ka-52M can also only load up to 4x ordinances in total distributed in one missile per pylon usually 2, 3, 4 and 5 while the 6th is reserved for the AS-BPLA which is required for the missile-helicopter data link such like recieving images from the ordinance camera.
as i read, the army expo 2022 info claimed the abilit of 8 LMUR being loaded. Im not sure if its true, but i found that one
1 Like
There are a photos, but it’s taken on expo.
On expo any weapon can be attached on any pylon – it’s simple demonstration. This doesn’t mean that Mi-28NM can use that configuration.
kakakakakkakakakakakakakakakakkakakakakak the list just getting BIGGER every time
1 Like
Well obviously. Its a lot easier to make a childish collage instead of actually engaging with an argument.
1 Like
If you look closely, this comes up when it’s already past the point of productive discussion. You NATO mains argue for ego, not for the truth. I’ve seen many on that list they are busta 3 years ago, 3 years later still a busta, some of you would rather choose to stuck in your own rigid viewpoints and be busta of a player for life.
2 Likes
Lmao dude the collage came up when i argued that you dont need to play russia, in fact you dont even need to play the game, to see the latest iterations of blatant favoritism, reading bug reports is entirely enough. Ofc he doesnt want to keep arguing when his only type of argument is “im gud you bad” in fact youre exactly doing the same rn, because none of you seem to grasp the concept that favoritism doesnt automatically mean russia is the best or that the person calling it out thinks that russia is broken. I do not think that russia is broken at all, yet i still think russia gets favourable treatment compared to anyone else. russia can be not the best and still be favoured, those things are not mutually exclusive. But to understand that one would need to actually read and understand things people write instead of coming to assumptions without basis like necron did in his infinite wisdom.
3 Likes
Spoiler
Expo ≠ ability to use in this configuration. It’s just a demonstration.