so u’re telling me that 7/6secs reload is faster than a NATO reload? what a joke, Abrams can reload in 5secs and the Leopards have better As reload than the T-90M by 0.5secs, and don’t make me talk about Leclercs and Type 10s.
M1A2 reloads in 5.0secs
Merkavas also 5.0secs
Ariete also 5.0secs
Challengers too except the 3 TD which reloads in 6.0secs for using the german L/55 A1
all Leopards and Strv 122s 6.0secs
T-80BVM 6.0secs
WTF I NEVER NOTICED! why would it have longer reload if it’s an APFSDS not an ATGM?
in perspective it’s just a longer 3BM42, why does it have 0.4secs longer reload!?
3BM-60’s long length prevents two of them from being located next to eachother in the carousel.
That means the carousel requires more time to rotate to a slot in which the next 3BM-60 is located.
You can side armor-pierce any main battle tank except for the Russian ones equipped with explosive reactive armor. In most cases, hitting these main battle tanks does not cause damage because their explosive reactive armor and other armor deflect the steel needles, which is entirely due to gaijin has reinforced the protective data of Russian tanks in the game and downgraded other countries’ tanks… It’s not the technical issue you mentioned.
The loading speed of Chinese tanks was updated together with the loading speed of Russian tanks in the previous few versions. Before the update, the loading speed of the 99A main battle tank was 7.1s.
I only have American tanks. The M1 needs a “Ace” crew to achieve a 5.0s loading speed, which isn’t easy, as elite crew’s loading speed is 5.3s. Additionally, if the M1 encounters a Russian main battle tank, its turret is highly likely to be destroyed in one shot, leaving it stuck in place, and even with a fast loading speed, it won’t help lmao…