Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
4346

@CAS_is_Bаlаnced
My bad, the edit didn’t save, I’m not mobile data,

mmW is ofc a bit out of reach, I would be happy with IR / SAL switch.
The IR guidance doesn’t want to hit if only a part of a tank is visible.

The implementations of Spike, PARS, JAGM are a joke, these missiles have 0 lofting and hit directly a lot of the time hitting the strongest armor part.
This ofc isn’t the case for LMURs, perfect lofting with perfect stats, mini Kh-38MT.

And some devs in bug reports cried they can’t give PARS correct lofting due to game limitation some time ago.

I understand why you got so mad, I also said it in a wierd way.
What I wanted to say is that, the real life JAGM-MR has 3 switchable guidedance types, translating that to this to War Thunder, the JAGM-MR should have switchable IR / SAL + a sprinkle of lofting.

1 Like
4347

That can’t work at the same time and can be switched only in one way (gnss/iog → laser) once.

4348

I think you can pick guidance by enabling / disabling laser designator before launch.
Switching from GNSS to laser happends after launch, right?

I’m not sure if the JAGM can switch after launch, ability to switch before launch would be enough.

A simple mechanic,
Laser designator enabled before launch => missile is SAL
Laser designator disabled before launch => try IR lock

4349

Thinking Chinese cheaters only play russia is hilarious.

They usually play Chinese vehicles, or OP vehicles.

Gaijin is a Russian company, that consistently nerfs its own vehicles lol. Get a grip

1 Like
4350

Yep all those constant nerfs for Russian vehicles. I truly can’t comprehend how you poor guys can keep playing in these deeply unfair conditions

2 Likes
4351

Clearly I’m a masochist.

I could play my T58 for free easy wins, even in full uptiers.

1 Like
4352

Yes but if you disable laser or lose the lock most weapons will drift considerably. The GNSS won’t pick back up. Laser disables GNSS permanently.

4353

Why does it matter? ALL m1a2’s have same armor. The only thing the sep variants bring are size, weight and lack of maneuverability.

4354

Well duh, if you enable and disable the laser designator then it goes just by IOG.

Not my point though

4355

Capability reasons. I’m all for them removing the KH-38MT if it makes yall happy, but they have to substitute in a T-14 Armata

4356

Capability is not modeled into the game. fnf should have a limit of 2! They don’t have to remove them.

4357

Capability is in the game. What do you think battle rating is?

4358

Only now did they add more smokes and lws for sepv2. They are still ultrra soft targets…ALL of them. Their effective armor is all the same.

1 Like
4359

That’s why SEPv3 would come with the T-14

4360

And the 2A8

4361

Can’t wait for that period of nonstop whining

4362

SEPv3 should have came sooner, considering most of top tier mbts have APS except US. (Leo2a8 with aps its kinda new so it makes sense it comes later).

T-14 should come along with the Abrams X and Panther KF51.

1 Like
4363

Hell no. Leo 2a7Vs went into service in 2021

T-14 Armata is from 2015

And SepV3 is from 2017 if I recall.

Meaning out of everyone Germany / Italy have the newest MBT.

4364

Why would the T-14 come along with tanks 7+ years newer?

SepV3 makes more sense. Germany is kinda capped out. Not sure what everyone else would get.

Also “most” I wouldn’t even consider using the T-72B3A tbh. Not to mention, the other fact the those gimmicks rarely work on anything except ATGMs and low speed heat.

Black night, and the Merkava Mk.4, and what the T72B3A?

4365

sepv3 will be the same as the others as far as you know who is concerned. t14 is garbage irl.