Just another part of china crying
2 Likes
ChinaCry again
Recently I have been playing the US TT ARB. Unfortunately, you guessed wrong.
- No? SepV3 adds an APS.
- As far as your opinion it is not factually proven to be a bad tank
All but the 4th gen mbt is wrong.
1000mm frontal armor on the crew compartment, pretty sure it’s 600 on the sides, the area around the gun isn’t armored and the hull sides near that area are likely only 100mm. You can ammo rack it, but it’s designed to blow the turret out to keep the crew alive
It also changes the turret drive to electrical I believe for easier maintenance.
Bye bye hydraulic sump pump, you won’t be missed.
I’m not quite following here… also the T-80bvms are not became largely inert after newer rounds were added.
It’s not by any means a great tank.
In order to ammo rack it you have to go through that 1000mm frontal armor and through the crew. Also the turret could not have any armor but thats useless when the turret its empty. Its like hitting a 2s38 turret except it doesnt have the ammo in the turret.
So in conclusion, only way to kill it with current rounds its lower plate and in hull down you will not make any damage that cant be repaired, as so no crew loss or ammo rack
I was just being simple since he things nothing was added lol
Most shots would likely disable the turret, but the t14 has the mobility to flee.
The APS though may degrade APFSDS up to 12~% and largely eliminate and HEAT projectiles
And thats why it should come along with modern tanks and rounds in the other nations.
Fixing the armor and adding actual in service ammunition would be enough for the current line of top tier tanks to stay competetive tbh.
You asked why the T-14 would come with tanks 7+ years newer. The answer is balance, or at least Gaijins idea/vision of balance.
Same reason why Russia got the BVM which was between 7-20 years newer than what a lot of other nations had at top tier at the time.
Russia was suffering at the time and needed a more capable MBT at the time, which came in the form of the much much newer T-80BVM. So if Gaijin deems the T-14 too powerful they will release it alongside MBTs that are a bit newer than it.
4 Likes
Me: waiting on the MZ auto loader buff.
Edit:
Buff to make it accurate to it’s irl performance such as how the T58 & hstvl got their irl performance.
2 Likes
APS will rarely work on sepv3…I can almost guarantee it in game. The t14 is plagued with problems, but one thing is certain…it has the carousel thats famous! It is a propaganda machine same as always from the East machines.
Man this game still sucks at top tier been a few weeks and jump back in, same problems. Russian rotary wing and fixed wing CAS dominate games.
And now they are teamed up with the USA (no doubt to pad USA win rates) So LMUR and JAGM…Great times.
Gaijin please bigger maps and just make the game playable
1 Like
if I make such a table that says T-14 can be destroyed by 5.56mm all around will that too be a valid primary source?
1 Like
Considering a single Bradley managed to make T-90M incapable during one vs one I’d say you have a high chance.
So tell me, did NATO recieve in protection equivalent such as BMPT? Thats why russia is steam rolling because of 1 overpowered vehicle design that cannot be nerffed, cuz it would hurt theyre wallet
I think the WT community Soviet main would destroy you in few seconds.