I do understand that this clip doesnt show top tier but this is the people i meet at 9.3
Not reserves…3.0…no…
9.3 guys…its easy to say that if these people gets their hands on a top tier vehicle,the outcome its easy to know
Or could be combo of teams. That can decide a win, like at top tier, Sweden + Germany is typically an auto win button
Win rate ≠ vehicle effectiveness
And
Vehicle effectiveness ≠ win rate
Why? Because you need a conscious team to win. You can’t solo a 1 v 18
Pretty much the only vehicle I could ever think of in WTs history where they are equal, is the T58, merely because it is so obscenely effective, that it actually can dictate win rate.
3 Likes
Germany and Sweden is trash ,They only have tanks ,and they will be deleted ai will by LMUR
1 Like
I give a broken fnf to russia free OR America gets to research a totally new copter, then research down the tree to unlock. IT IS BIAS. I have both of them and USA was MUCH more work to get unlocked rather than just logging in!
Read again, Russia and the US have to research the same amount of helicopters to get to their fnf helicopters.
Go ingame and check if you don’t believe me.
5 Likes
Because gaijin is bias and Buffs Russian vehicles to death. Then lets chinese players hack and cheat while they play Russia all day. What a disgrace as video game devs we should boycott this game again 🙄
2 Likes
MI was released atleast four (4) years ago! All mods were researched LONG ago! When fnf came to it, it was automatically UNLOCKED! NO work was done! The new Apache had to be fully researched then the fnf had to be further researched down the tree! To be fair they should have given the fnf to the current version of the 64 D! That would have been fair! English NOT your first language? This WAS BIAS!
I find it incredible how mentally capable you are of commenting something idiotic every time.
4 Likes
Okay, does that mean US players are entitled to just research 4 instead of 5 helicopters ?
No it was not, i had to research the module.
You are the only biased one here, since you want the US have to research 700k RP less then Russia.
3 Likes
700k more for a heli with chopped features and chopped missile.
They made JAGM-MR IR only, this could have been done to the Longblow Hellfire on the D Apache a long time ago.
Since both are / would be implemented this way for the sake of “balance”
1 Like
But JAGM MR has a IR mode AGM-114L does not
Yeah, 1 JAGM has NIR, mmW and SAL guidance. 2/3 ignored in both in-game cases. Not the mention the garbage lofting on Hellfires and JAGMs.
The point was, they added a chopped missile, Longbow H. could be been added a long time ago, at least it would be F&F
How are they ignored
Only the MMW mode is
Current in game limitation prevents the JAGM-MR to have all the modes at once
Yes, the JAGM-MR should have all 3 of them.
The “game limitation” is a joke, you can switch the behaviour of proxy rounds with a keybind and some weapons have 2 guidance methods like GNSS + Laser
I think if they at least tried (spoiler alert, NATO weapon so not at all), this could be possible.
1 Like
No it shouldn’t. Some of us like playing ground vehicles in ground RB and can actually do well without needing overpowered CAS to compensate for a skill issue.
7 Likes
Someone’s gonna hate me for saying this but like, it could just be a engine limitation… Double/Tri mode seekers I mean
Ou yeah,
Kh-38MT shreading? No problem
LMUR shreading? No problem
Someone says JAGM has shitty implementation? Call it a skill issue since the player guides the IR missile, you know
2 Likes
You really think you’re getting at something here.
I can at least counter Kh38 and current JAGMs with smoke. MMW can’t be countered with anything besides hard cover.
And I don’t want this game to become even more corner camper simulator. So yeah MMW can **** off for the time being.
Also it’s not like the JAGM-MR is doing poorly currently lmao.
5 Likes