The manufacturer has removed all military products from its website, so this is debatable.
1 Like
KH-29s really only work on stationary targets… their tv guided.
1 Like
I know, but they do lock and track targets once its in view of the seeker, and the point lock is good enough to rock any SPAA standing still in spawn. Gaijin just took the seeker FoV and zoom values from the Kh-29 seeker and made it 3rd gen IIR for the Kh-38MT. When we know that’s not really the case.
I refuse to believe Gaijin has a QA team.
1 Like
If they do either I’ve been super unlucky, or they don’t actually track all that well, which is likely the case.
Nah, don’t white wash them. They’re quite literally “The zu” squadron. I assure you and approve the message.
You responded to the wrong post.
The quote you used has no opinions, claims, or narratives.
Meanwhile your response was to a post that has a claim, opinion, or narrative.
4 Likes
Did you not notice the mention of a requirement of " Target/Background Contrast of 4 Degrees kelvin"? That is a requirement to sustain ~7 grey levels difference to the scene in order to maintain a track(assuming a charitable NEΔK of only .27 degrees, as specified). All it would be good for is terminal guidance in a AShM role, with a secondary infrastructure (Power generation)target set.
Digital (IIR) Mavericks that use the WGU-10/B (AGM-65D) seeker could function with one NEΔK level(though the output would be noisy, and probably force an early reversion to correlation tracking for applicable variants(-65F & -65G), due to the way they work. As they stretch the scene’s contrast to fit 8 grey levels and use that mapping for the calculation of the target’s centroid (or correlate axis’s independently for point targets).
3 Likes
I was on the side of russia not being op and the game being kinda balenced rn.
But i just played like 10 games and russia won all of them with the help of a lott of cas
Well, to point out the most obvious is the introduction of the LDIRCM, which are the main reason for the disaster that has happened at the highest level thanks to their immunity to the current new missiles, outside of the manual guided ones that are the ones that can deal with them.
But that leads to a problem that goes hand in hand with the elimination of the MI-28NM thanks to the above, these we could say that apart from eliminating the rest of the opposing team also eliminate the players who start using them from the beginning, making that by eliminating the air defense it leaves free passage to the CAS of the USSR free for the attack and destroy the opposing team, the problem arises that in order to deal with MI-28s you have to use a manual guidance one that is not as capable of dealing with the high-level CAS plus those that know how to hide whenever necessary.
Sorry if I write something too obvious.
Random poll time. 11/11/25
How many matches has the ussr won in your last 10? (try to stick to 1 set of br’s)
Top Tier (12.0+)
- 9-10
- 7-8
- 5-6
- 3-4
- 1-2
0
voters
Just below (10.0-11.7)
- 9-10
- 7-8
- 5-6
- 3-4
- 1-2
0
voters
Above mid (8.0-9.7)
- 9-10
- 7-8
- 5-6
- 3-4
- 1-2
0
voters
mid (6.0-7.7)
- 9-10
- 7-8
- 5-6
- 3-4
- 1-2
0
voters
Below mid (5.7 below)
- 9-10
- 7-8
- 5-6
- 3-4
- 1-2
0
voters
1 Like
you might wanna redo this
3 Likes
this is weird, can you make a poll in a spoiler?
Edit: well seems like my polls cant be put in spoilers now. I thought i was able to in the past but idk
1 Like
Winning more doesn’t mean that a tree is op. Maybe you just got lucky or that there are a lot of good players playing USSR at the moment
7 Likes
It, absolutely does. The entire point of the matchmaker is to have the Global Win rate of each player as close to 50% as possible. And it will do its best, within constrains to make that happen; regardless of player skill.
Thus by the objectives of the Matchmaker it is most definitely overperforming by sheer numbers, but as to if it’s a significant factor that needs outside redressing (and how) is up for debate.
I do think one thing that would be useful would be for various “relevant” bug reports to potentially be given priority so they don’t sit around for as long.
1 Like
That usually only happens if a tree has something busted lol.
FOTM effect.
I remember once the Chinese tree has a high winrate. However, the state of the Chinese tree back then was even worse than now
2 Likes
I do understand that this clip doesnt show top tier but this is the people i meet at 9.3
Not reserves…3.0…no…
9.3 guys…its easy to say that if these people gets their hands on a top tier vehicle,the outcome its easy to know
Or could be combo of teams. That can decide a win, like at top tier, Sweden + Germany is typically an auto win button
Win rate ≠ vehicle effectiveness
And
Vehicle effectiveness ≠ win rate
Why? Because you need a conscious team to win. You can’t solo a 1 v 18
Pretty much the only vehicle I could ever think of in WTs history where they are equal, is the T58, merely because it is so obscenely effective, that it actually can dictate win rate.
3 Likes