Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

doesnt make situation any better btw.
only worser, as there are ppl who get ztarded “willingly”

Wow, let me ask you a question: do you believe in Santa Claus? Do you believe in Martians? I’m not going to talk about politics anymore because it’s not appropriate here out of respect for the moderators, but if you want to continue, feel free.

My nickname is “red military” in Cyrillic, and I joined the clan for personal reasons. Rs

3 Likes

You just can’t come here, dodge every single question and deny evidence about Russian equipment overperforming and not be pressed about your Cyrilic name and your Zr*s squadron name

1 Like

I kind of understand it from people who are brought up and indoctrinated there, but people who opt in to the regime while living in europe/america are genuinely insane, I will never understand it

Rahhhh Finnish invention

1 Like

I will avoid all questions with political content, and regarding the equipment, I have already answered what I think; I haven’t avoided anything. Lol

Who the hell knows, it doesn’t actually exist.

I assumed 320x256 given the other factors, the era etc.

We can make educated guesses based on the era it’s from etc. Can’t do anything else as it doesn’t exist.

Lads - don’t do that. The thread will be locked and then I’ll have to do the laundry and we don’t want that.

So will you acknowledge that:

  1. Kh-38MT is overperforming due to made up stats, and that it should not behave the ways it does in game, which would only be LOAL and thus this missile being forbidden from being in the game.

  2. That IRCM implementation is completely broken and in favor of you know who.

  3. That other nations deserve similar equipment and fixes to their helicopter launched AGMs, aka adding top attack for most other missiles that have it.

I appreciate the answer.

Without knowing the actual meaning of the squadron name, we can’t know ourselves.
Za is “For” in Russian.
You have the capital “Z” for use as a military symbol.
There’s a bit of obfuscation going on.

Either way, irrelevant of his personal beliefs, him being correct about Russian equipment being chronically average would remain correct irrelevant of his decisions.

As for your recent response.
1- Hammer is equally over-performing in that context because LOAL is required for both to lose their AGM-64D placeholder seekers.
2- In favor of USA, China, and USSR, soon to be more.

Both of those examples are examples of no bias toward Russia.

3 Likes
  1. I already said that I can’t say whether it performs better or worse than in the game, since it’s a relatively new and obviously secret weapon.
  2. Then remove all helicopters with DIRCM or remove only the DIRCM, and leave only the FnF missiles, after all, AH64E (USA) and Z10 are also immune to IR missiles and immune to ARH in multipath.
  3. Try to find a post of mine saying that the others shouldn’t have good weapons.
3 Likes

Feel free to ask any further questions.

This should have been done on the upcoming update, as well as making helicopter rotors actually give a radar return so they’re not invisible to Doppler radar when hovering.

It’s an utterly absurd situation.

The seeker range and capabilities is a universal feature across all nations and missiles.

What’s not fair or real is how Kh-38MT was implemented, which is completely false and out of the real of possibility from what we know about it. The seeker sensitivity and imaging quality is too low, it’s only a terminal guidance aid for locking onto the target at the final moments of flight, at very close range.

At the very least they could’ve limited the lock range and reduced the thermal quality to AGM-65G levels for balance.

They took the Kh-29TE seeker, made it 3rd gen IR and gave it insane zoom and lock range levels to bypass their own rules on LOAL missiles, since the player can “technically” see and lock the target from what would’ve been a blind standoff range shot in real life.

It’s basically impossible to hit them, that’s why I still use Pantsir FlakRakRaD, and I’ll use the ITO90 in France when I finish acquiring it. ARH missiles can’t hit them if they’re low, and helicopters from 3 nations are immune to IR them. I wouldn’t mind if they removed them so people would stop complaining. Rs

1 Like

I agree, LDIRCM was a level of powercreep the game isn’t ready for, especially as options simply don’t exist for most nations without a lot of hoop jumping and dubious bug reports.

Helis were fine as they were when they were limited to 8km range, all gaijin had to do was slowly implement other FnF missiles to those lacking them, but oh well, they dug their own grave with this one.

No, it’s not a relatively new or secret weapon, Kh-38ML has been used with some success but the IR one was a commercial failure, seeing as all mentions of it have been erased from the manufacturer. We also have the brochure proving the seeker is overperforming.

LDIRCM is fine. Something like this was necessary for helicopters to be viable. LDIRCM + FnF is not fine.