So 2 missiles getting a 7x multikill is possible, let alone easy with every other CAS weapon in your eyes?
The launch vehicles were too close to each other; what fault is it of theirs if the design of this awful map doesn’t allow them to do the job of the SPAA?
Don’t try to pretend the topic isn’t about Russia overperforming in some areas, you are literally Russian, and your squadron is zRUS (Which that alone should get you banned)🤦as if it wasn’t obvious enough who you are politically affiliated to. Kh-38MT is not the wonderweapon Gaijin has made out to be, and I want you to acknowledge it.
Is removing it or toning it down to realistic levels so hard to grasp to you?
2 Likes
It’s like using the AIM-9L infrared head to draw conclusions about the AGM-65 infrared head.
So nothing in that video is problematic
Except the KH38MT has a 9B seeker compared to the 9L
Look, I’m not going to debate whether the weaponry is as good as you say the gaijin makes it seem, especially since we have little information about it beyond some uses in a place in Eastern Europe. So I’m not going to believe either you or the gaijin. Just because I look Russian, my name is “Red” military" in Russian, and my squadron is Russian doesn’t mean I’m Russian lmao.
No, the TEL launchers were all grouped together, so it equaled 7 kills, and they had almost 10 seconds to fire at the Su-30.
Technically 4x multikill if you count the players, not the vehicles.
Yeah wrap it up, come back when we get 18x FNF brimstones, nuke the entire enemy team + all their CAS and helis, and tell me that CAS missiles aren’t problematic
TBH, this is a huge failure of Gaijin’s balance process. They keep adding systems without properly thinking through the gameplay impact, let things run wild for ages, then fix them in heavy-handed ways that swing the meta completely the other way. It’s become a pattern at this point.
Look at naval. The Scharnhorst’s survivability and the broken damage model made it almost unsinkable for years, and when that finally got fixed it was followed by another overpowered ship. The same thing happened in ground battles with the Kh-38MT. Ignoring that it shouldn’t have been added in the first place, a missile that should’ve had a terminal-only IR seeker got implemented like a full-on thermal tracker and dominated top tier for ages. The fixes that followed overcorrected with new SPAAs that tanked Russian win rates, and then Gaijin overcorrected again by adding a broken DIRCM system and the LMUR.
It’s not bad luck, it’s a systemic issue with how they test and balance things.
3 Likes
If each TEL was a different SPAA they would still die in that position
Have a great day👍
The only thing you have for the X-38MT guidance head is sensitivity, which will remove the temperature difference of 0.27 Celsius, which in fact can’t say anything about what the guidance head is capable of, because you don’t know either the matrix size or the operating temperature range.
Why you think that? Rs
2 Likes
Did I say anything about it? Lmao, you are grasping at straws now, MT would have used an infrared imaging seeker, but it’s not 3rd gen, and it cannot lock targets the way it does in game, the lock range would be terrible for anything tank sized, it’s only there for terminal guidance like any other cruise missile in existence.
This should be copy pasted everywhere
Because why would you willingly affiliate yourself with neo imperialism and war crimes if you’re not even part of the perpetrators
I think people assume too much about players for the decisions they make without knowing the reasons.
@Военный_Красный
Why did you join that squadron, and why the Cyrillic name?
1 Like
There’s a fairly limited range of motives to join a squadron called ‘Zrus’