What benefit does the USSR have besides a superior air-to-ground missile? I won’t consider LMUR valid because everyone except Sweden will receive helicopters as well, and with FnF.
Aren’t a bunch of Japanese jets fake too?
Only the R2Y2s and the F-16AJ.
Guess what, it actually is a problem when the most popular tech tree boasts the highest Winrate in the game.
Exactly that. One fake superior agm and one that’s miles better than its competitors, because its competitors are artificially gimped. Add that on a helicopter with a grossly overperforming LDIRCM and you get imbalance.
First one got removed and the second has its own dedicated explanation by gaijin why it is in the game despite being fake
based, tho as we can see at least three get, sweden gets best tanks, USSR gets best attackers, and china is basically the only country gaijin listens
So they fix the Ldircm on the Mi-28nm, boot that back to 12.7 with the Tiger UHT, and the Mh-60 for Israel.
They remove the KH-38mt for the skeptics satisfaction… what next? What will you claw from Russia next?
It’s bad enough gaijin won’t give the MZ loader its true reload speed, for one of the arguably weakest mbts now.
Removing the center racks of the SU30SM and buffing the stingers would be nice, making every agm correctly loft, giving Nato tanks rounds that are not older than 95% of the playerbase would also be cool. Id be satisfied if we got that.
Reload just needs a complete rework at this point. Ace reloads are borderline Pay to win, manual loaders is complete guesswork and autloaders are also terribly implemented.
1 Like
-
I can get behind the lofting being fixed
-
I’m pretty sure the su27s do have the center pylons.
-
nato rounds are quite good in game, you would need the SepV3 for m829a3, which at that point, where is the T-14 Armata? Leo’s have up to date rounds for the most part etc.
-
manual loaders typically over preform at top tier, where as auto loaders under preform. Post the modeling, even one bit of spall can jam the loaders and can cause a 32 sec repair with ace crew.
2 Likes
Now they do yes.
However when it was released the MiG-27K was probably the most dominant CAS platform around.
1 Like
The T-80s are far from the weakest, they are still solid middle of the pack MBTs that are easy to do decent in.
That being said I had no problems with the reload buff.
4 Likes
I would say the T80Bvm > Merkava > chally > ariete
So if you say middle, it’s on the low side of middle.
1 Like
Im pretty sure the SU30SM and the SU27 are not identical
They are, doesnt change that theyre ammo from 1994(M829A2 OFL 1220 F1) and 2001(DM53) against 2016 best rounds RU has to offer. Also i think SEPv3 is m829A4 not A3
Pov: russian tank commander in eastern europe.
The L55A1 on the 2A7V was made for the DM73 and were still using the 2001 DM53
Both over and underperform depending on circumstance, manual loaders absolutely overperform in motion and sustained fire but underperform in stationary short bursts. Also the insane reloads for manual loaders are gate kept behind 1.1 million SL and either 2300 Ge or 1.3 million RP
Same for the turret baskets on Abrams and Leos
More like: T-80BVM > Merkava > Challys > ZTZ99A/WZ1001 > Oplot > VT-4A1 > Ariete > T-90M > T-72B3A
Ranking isn’t perfectly in order and I’m probably forgetting some 12.3 MBTs, but you get the idea.
EDIT: there we go, I forgot the Oplot. And the Merkava, somehow.
1 Like
-
Su/30/27 both have the middle pylon.
-
as I made a post however far ago, manual loaders over preform, with most irl loaders in full combat gear achieving a full reload in about 6.38~ secs in average. And these were well trained individuals, the time was tank from a sample of 10 different loaders.
-
this should kill the crew, but doesn’t: https://youtu.be/1kBselFcrfc?si=121uCT5-0HyV5tyV
-
DM53 is the correct round to be used dm73 is listed as still in development from what I have found, with it starting to develop in 2020. “Old” ammo like dm53 is made in the thousands, so old stock piles will likely be used first. Nor does it seem Germany is stocking their tanks with it yet.
-
2015 T90M & T-14 Armata were unveiled at the Victory day parade. They entered production shortly before, and entered production at the same time. t-14 Armata isn’t a prototype and as of today’s has 68 listed tanks. Therefore with m1a2sepv3. Being a 2018 tank. As well as newer Leo 2a8s likely to come to the came, I’m still questioning where the T-14 Armata is.
2 Likes
I’m surprised you listed o plot so low tbh. Isn’t it a better T80U(M)?
It has worse forward mobility and worse armor than the T-80U.
At least the T-80U UFP will block top tier darts at some ranges/angles or if it was a bad shot, the Oplot hull on the other hand is a lolpen at any range for 550+mm pen darts.
So it’s a T-series tank without the main advantage of the T-series tanks.
But it has a god reverse lol. So sounds like a t-80B, with only the era upgrade and a transmission upgrade.
TBH the t-80u only lives those darts if it’s lucky. DM53 is kinda mean
Ngl I’d like to see them add the Newest T-90m with its upgraded reverse gear (finally. Only took them 50-60 years)
2 Likes
Still no proof for it on the SU30SM whatsoever and as we all know things like that have to be specifically proven for each type and version of plane.
Yeah there are like 10000 posts about that topic all coming to different conclusion which is why i said a reword is needed, manual loading is grossly simplified so are autoloaders.
Youre probably mixing up DM73 and KE2020NEO aka DM83. DM73 is in service on the L55A1, DM83 started qualification in september 2024. (also theoretically DM63 and 63A1 exist as well)
Like i said, oversimplified but i dont think we need to have a discussion about what shots should kill when were comparing manual to autoloaders.
well like you said, its probably going to come into the game with the next gen of tanks. Which is honestly not a bad decision by Gaijin. If we had the T14 now there would be 0 new tank content for russia in the future.
PS: lol
- it lists dm53 still as the main used round, with dm73 not in production. If you could post a source, that would be great
- an open ammo hold with a direct hit not killing the crew is a pretty big problem… it’s like saying the autoloaders shouldn’t kill the crew if the ammo catches fire. But yes a total overhaul is needed, but the blast door being open and getting hit needs to be fixed now rather than later it’s only fair.
- you say lol to the T-14 not being a proto, but they’re working kinks out and fixing flaws I’m sure with any tank. And yes I know the aren’t producing them in high numbers at all. I think a goood stop gap would be to give the current T-90m in game another upgrade package to give it the new transmission. Rather than add a new tank with the thermal protection covering, the transmission and so on.
Is the t14 and last t90 varient the only things left for the ussr? (Besides more one off prototypes of t80’s)