I’ve seen footage of it, but it’s certainly wasn’t common even before the proliferation of drones. Riding on bmps however seemed to be the norm.
Riding on btrs is a norm, merely due to where the side doors are, and low armor. Might as well be able to jump off quick.
I think they fixed those issues with the new btr tho
Thanks staff, that last 10 mins was a tough read 😆
War thunder 2 with new engine will be better ig
Merkava Mk.4s and Arietes too
1 Like
That’s how the cookie crumbles, bring Char 2C dingus. You’ll get first place every time.
yeah and apache and ka 50 added to game germany have helicopters with tow missile for long… ka 50 destoryed ground battle min one years…
so on T series u swich from apfsds to another type of shell the reload need to be more longer because the autoloader roatate more where is the chosed shell placed but this implemented in WT?
1 Like
what is with two tanks? is in tech tree now? u have chance to buy no! now every nations afther this years have a lot of prototypes with max 2 number builded and seat on museom but is is techtree…
Can you speak English? Because this is gibberish.
What?
translate u dont understaand…
By what rule ? It cost a lot for individual but you can’t apply it to company that planning to mass produce it.
The same “study” claims protection figures impossible for the Chally 2, their stats for KE rounds were pulled out of the void (why is BM-60s L/D ratio bigger than 59s when they’re the same round but only made from different material?), unreliable thru and thru and I suggest stopping relying on a crutch like this.
I think you should stop finding excuses to deny my source. This is clearly reliable information made by a trusted institution.
Do you have any info?
https://www.longrods.ch/perfcalc.php
“trusted institution”, but their mumbers are… based on estimates from early 2010s and originate from internet forums, lmao.
pls stop coping and using that crutch thanks.
Calculators are only an estimate
This is what Gaijin uses, feel free to cope away.
And, L-0 actually gives values that are CLOSE to what we could expect of a KE round when fired at a semi-infinite block of RHA, your “source” uses made up values that were based on total round length and generally sucked out of the writer’s finger.
1 Like
Wrong… The M1 Abrams was designed from the start to defeat Soviet KE ammo. The problem was that the US didn’t know the 125mm would be that common and proofed it against the 115mm. Hence why the IPM1/M1A1 were uparmored so quickly after the first M1, and the HA a few years after the M1A1.
DU is heavy NERA made to provide both high resistance against KE and HEAT. It’s known that General Dynamics researched non-DU heavy NERA so that they can export the Abrams(can’t export DU). That was done originally in the 90s for Sweden, then used in other export Abrams and finally brought to the SEP v.3 hull and very likely in the SEP v.2 hull too.(Heavy NERA but not DU)
The USA researched double plate heavy ERA concepts more than a decade before Relikt(2006), my man. There are a few 1990s US patents about it, here’s one(1992):
NATO never had much faith in that because both Kontakt-5 and Relikt are effectively dead weight against modern ammunition, which is specifically designed to defeat heavy ERA. So why would the US/NATO add heavy ERA that has already proven ineffective?
Russia does so largely because the country lacks the money to replace its aging tank fleet with modern designs like the T-14. Tanks such as the T-90 have structural limitations on how much conventional (non-ERA) armor they can carry so ERA is the only way to make them slightly better.
8 Likes
You’re utterly clueless.
Since the KH-38MT(E) is an export proposition, they won’t actually start mass producing the seeker until someone decides to show interest, and since rosoboron delisted the KH-38MT(E) then that means no export customer will be able to show interest.
TLDR: The KH-38MT has, and never will be mass produced
2 Likes