Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

The problem is the sodding great lumps of high-velocity metal that are flying out from a detonating ERA array. It doesn’t just vanish or go away once it has done it’s job.

Anything within a decent distance, supporting infantry (yes, infantry are needed to support tanks), soft-skin vehicles, even MT-LBs which are barely rated proof against small arms fire - is at tremendous risk of being cut to bits.

If anything, it is even worse in the drone age. Your nice ERA blast will probably sever any tethered drones on your vehicle and bugger up the EW/ECM gear on any vehicle that gets too close…

A perfect solution it really isn’t…

You’ve never been in the military lol.

Tactics / strategy 101. Never be near a tank. Why? They’re loud, tall, and are typically the main target from the enemy.

1 Like

Now tell me how to protect the tank and the concentration of troops near it? Oh, you don’t know? What part of “war has changed” didn’t you understand? NO ONE knows how to effectively protect tanks against drones that can destroy their tracks with a small RPG charge, immobilize you, and then other drones come to finish the job, and you still want to put soldiers near the tank.

The era is designed to protect the vehicle sure, but it’s lethal to infantry who are accomponing it if they’re too close.

It also complicates moving the tanks. Having to remove the era before transport and re-attach it.

It’s just not worth it when modern NERA is pretty dammed good.

Erm…no. NERA is provided in the form of modules - pretty much like ERA blocks. Replacing them is no more difficult - if anything it’s easier.

image

True, not every ERA is as destructive. But anything like K5 and above very much is - simply due to the need to fire material out/down/up to disrupt an incoming dart.

Then don’t stand near it, crazy lifehack.

1 Like

They must think we’re in the 1940s, where soldiers were transported on top of tanks when there were no other vehicles.

I would say an APS is by far the worst for troops.

And who employs APSs?

USA, Germany, Italy, Israel, and Russia.

I’m not talking about external NERA.

I mean to be fair, thats still happening a lot.

1 Like

😅

Yah… this still happens. Hell, Marines, my brothers, have been known to ride on the sides of Apache’s to rescue wounded

Often, when we’re talking about IFVs, we’re discussing other things and not MBTs.

Even then. The infantry is taught, at least in the US, to get far as F**k away from the vehicles, because they do their job and got you to where you need to go, and they haven’t stopped being a target since they drove you in.

1 Like

To be honest, in combat situations I’ve only seen it on IFVs like BMPs, BTRs, etc., but I haven’t seen it on top of tanks.

Thats also wrong,SPAA overpressure issues with a thing,you can overpressure an Obj279 frontally like i did with my Gepard

Guess why they are so broken?Gaijin ignoring bug/issues made on purpose or by mistake

I definitely think the spaa are the worst offenders around there. Bmd-4s aren’t all that annoying imo. But a good BMP-3 player in a hull down position can be.

I remember a time when the Is-2 could be .50 cal’d in the front due to a bug. Took them 3 weeks to fix it.

I think I saw it occur on some Challies and abrams mostly.

I always blame Gaijin for those bugs,however at the same time i do understand that its hard to improve stuff on a 13 year old engine with over 300 vehicles to take into consideration

Said so…still SPAA issue wont prove that BMDs arent legit broken

I’ve seen footage of it, but it’s certainly wasn’t common even before the proliferation of drones. Riding on bmps however seemed to be the norm.

Riding on btrs is a norm, merely due to where the side doors are, and low armor. Might as well be able to jump off quick.

I think they fixed those issues with the new btr tho

Thanks staff, that last 10 mins was a tough read 😆