Every time I read new posts on this thread I lose more hope with the community. Now people are bringing up mid tier vehicles in a discussion specifically about top tier to justify their arguments. What’s the point of tags anymore if no one cares about them.
1 Like
What can Russian tanks do that M1s can’t?
What are you even on about, am i living rent free in your head that it took you a week to comeback n respond.(also bro exaggerating 1 week when it was like 3 days lmao)
Exactly
The Abrams are legit trash moduled,missing pieces of armor…
Light vehicles have nerfed to the ground reload rate or made their gun shoot pees instead of APDS rounds
And with the shooting pees statment im refering to the Bushamaster,how come the Bushmaster cant pen anything for shit from sides/behind even tho im using APDS?
If you even manage to pen something with that gun,you will most probably just scratch a module inside of the tank youre shooting at
The only Bushmaster than somewhat works its the one the EFV has,that Bushmaster when it shoots,its actually damaged vehicles surprisingly
5.8s is better than ACE tier reload in WT and 6.5s is only slightly slower than “expert” in WT, lol?
So “most manual loaders” manage between better than ace and about expert, waow.
It’s not 6.0 seconds? Hmm… cyclogram data disagrees.
Oki.
Also funny, here’s the whole cyclogram for what you posted:
It shows that it takes longer for them to load ATGMs (roughly 7.5s if they’re the next in sequance), but we don’t have that in WT, do we?
Tell me exactly how long you think an MZ loader is.
12 seconds…maybe make it 11/10
Abrams only had its chassis armor altered in the SRP V3 version. Until US players prove that others also had alterations (which they can’t because it’s restricted), then nothing will change. And besides, what fault does Gaijin have if Abrams has such an obvious weak point in the turret ring? I believe a shot there would be fatal for the crew, even if it were a shot from a humble RPG-7. As for the Bushmaster, I don’t know; he’s fine in my Vilkas.
it has been proven
multiple times
and gaijins argument about the suspension has also been proven to be false within a week of them saying it
because it only has it due to their poor modeling
it should be 200-300mm RHA equivalent volumetric armor instead of a single 50mm plate
Im pretty sure people explained and showed countless proofs that the Abrams have way better armor than its current state,if that for you aint enough…tf you want us to do?You want me to go to Donald Trump and make a vlog where he states everything by himself to make “True” for yall?
What? I’m talking about the abrams.
Also, here’s the full Cyclogram data:
NICE RANDOM DISCORD PIC. Also, nice lying bro 10/10
Where do you think I got the Cyclogram from??
1 Like
They’ll just say, “No, the T80 takes a full day to reload, while our NATO tanks do it in just one second.”
2 Likes
Ah so ur here just to argue for the sake of it.
No, I remember when this was the main topic on the forum, there was nothing but a mention that it had been tested, so nothing is proven.
They do that for the BMPs.
Ace and expert reload rates are THE SAME for all manual loaders in WT with 120s (except for Challies).
NICE RANDOM DISCORD PIC. Also, nice lying bro 10/10
Lmao, you should spend some time outside ngl, that cyclogram was posted on the RU forum, that’s where I got it from, if you wanna I can even message the guy who posted it for you on discord :P
They do that for the BMPs.
BMP-3s*
The BMD-4s are unaffected (i have the event one lol) and obv BMP-2s aren’t affected by it either.
Im not talking about reloads here,the video aboved that @UniqueScorpions-live showed me for some reason and tagged me even tho…i wasnt part of that discussion,shows it reload in like 11 seconds if you imagine the gun shooting the previous shell and discarding it
That means,we have video,Gaijin should implement it
From the time the round it picked up, and th breech is closed and the tank is ready to fire is about 3.84~ secs
Use your brain please
2 Likes
Even if it were 400mm of RHA, my T90, my Leopard, and my Leclerc would still penetrate it, so what’s the difference? And besides, I highly doubt we’ll have all that RHA there.