I’m away for work for 5 - 6 days a week so idk, i’m not up to date :/
Holy moly,what i have just read
Im not sure either i just thought so.
The reload rate for MZ autoloaders… isn’t even wrong? It can take much longer or shorter depending on “how far away the next indexed projectile” is, Gaijin went with a middle ground of I think +1 projectile, and some cyclograms even shows avg reload combat speeds of 7.5 - 8s, so cherrypicking a cyclogram that shows the fastest possible reload speed is nothing more than that, cherrypicking, it’s like NATO mains sending videos of stationary Leo 2s/M1s firing a round every 2 - 3 seconds when in actual combat it can take between 5 to 8 or even more seconds esp if the tank’s moving, Gaijin here also went with a middle ground so IMO it’s pretty fair.
1 Like
Well if they do then ngl, they should throw the LDIRCM helis even higher, atp if anything has a feature that allows it to be vastly better than their next closest equivalent should be higher, incl uparmored Leo 2s especially.
1 Like
So when it comes to russia,when something or someone unknown to the whole earth says the reload for (tank name) its 3 seconds we are gonna implement it cause thats enough proof
When it comes to Nato,we dont implement anything even tho we have countless proofs,images,videos and documents…
Weird how that goes huh…
1 Like
You said that Russia is the only one being artificially nerfed, which is just not true.
For examples the Abrams turret ring has still been half assedly implemented and Gaijin has made no moves to fix it. According to documents that the German players found the 2A7 should have better protection, but Gaijin insists to use a source that predates the vehicle by 20-25 years (but there are more knowledgable people here that can talk about that).
There are pictures etc of it so I count it as existing, otherwise every prototype that doesn’t have a model left in a museum somewhere is also a fake tank since they got scrapped afterwards.
Germany has had FnF missiles for years, so now they’re last in line to complain.
Your useless screenshot shows nothing but “destroyed.” After all, if you had hit a missile and then had to return to the helipad to rearm and then get back into action, there would be a time difference between the hits. And i talking abount the BUK not the Lmur
Hi, hello, strictly speaking yes. KMW’s onw slides show that 2A7s have MUCH HIGHER protection than the Strv 122s, but Gaijin insists that its the other way around, and books from the project manager of the 2A7Vs hull was to be AT LEAST equally protected to the turret (it isn’t by a mile), and based on the Swedish graphs, all up-armored Leo 2s are in fact lacking MUCH of their armor, as much as ~600 - 800mm when it comes to CE protection, and a bunch of KE protection in wider arcs.
1 Like
A prototype tank made to test a 120mm gun with countless photos and documents somehow its fake for Russia mains
1 Like
Yes, but weaker f&f helis such as Tiger, Jewhawk and A129 should not be same BR as the new ones in my opinion.
Lol. Is 2 whole minutes between kills not enough of a time difference, and how I only got a single whole kill after firing 8 PARS 3s during my 2nd sortie? :D
1 Like
So since im a USA main,that means im more that right to speak and complain right?Literally non sense youre saying not gonna lie
Gaijin has to fix and make tanks/planes how they are without giving us the bullshit about “Well we have only a photo about an ordinance that belong to Russia,that must be true,lets implement it”
However,when it comes to other nations “We have documents,video proofs,images,countless people stating its true…mhh nah i dont believe them and should not be implemented in game as its fake”
He destroyed everyone with one shot except for Pantsir and T90M.
Yes, you do. Why didn’t the US have FnF like Germany? It makes perfect sense. They had those Tiger figures with Fairy Tail for so long, and now other nations have better toys. That’s why they’re jealous because their toys aren’t as cool anymore, and they complain nonstop.
You is saying that Lmur doesn’t exist, is that right? I was literally banned from the forum for a couple of days for showing him in action in a certain conflict, lol.
And didn’t kill 3 other guys that had to be finished by others, so uh, congrats?
What’s your point here? Are you trying to defend the LMUR or just arguing for the sake of arguing? Objectively a NM or 64E have to put in FAR LESS effort to achieve what I did.
Legit all the tanks the US has at top tier and not even…starting from at least 8.3 its legit nerfed to the ground trying their best to make it a bad nation when its not…you got proof,you got documents,you got videos…stories…but that doesnt matter for Gaijin,since as long its Russia,they will implement anything that russian mains says,even if those are not confirmed at all by anyone in specific
This is something that doesnt happen to NATO tanks for example…let me why homeboy
It’s not 6.0 seconds? Hmm… cyclogram data disagrees.
There’s a lot more to unpack there, but gaijin doesn’t model certain shell types and how they are loaded.
Secondly. NATO reloads have been shown to over preform. Most manual loaders manage about 5.8-6.5 secs
Most of those videos people send, the loader keeps the door open, has no body armor on etc. making them fake reloads.
2 Likes
Honestly, I don’t care about your whining. Other nations have better toys now, and so that no one says I’m only on one side, I hope that the gaijin give more buffs to the Z10, the AH64, and the Mi-28NM.
Didnt know tankers have level 5 body armor