Ace and expert reload rates are THE SAME for all manual loaders in WT with 120s (except for Challies).
NICE RANDOM DISCORD PIC. Also, nice lying bro 10/10
Lmao, you should spend some time outside ngl, that cyclogram was posted on the RU forum, that’s where I got it from, if you wanna I can even message the guy who posted it for you on discord :P
They do that for the BMPs.
BMP-3s*
The BMD-4s are unaffected (i have the event one lol) and obv BMP-2s aren’t affected by it either.
Im not talking about reloads here,the video aboved that @UniqueScorpions-live showed me for some reason and tagged me even tho…i wasnt part of that discussion,shows it reload in like 11 seconds if you imagine the gun shooting the previous shell and discarding it
That means,we have video,Gaijin should implement it
From the time the round it picked up, and th breech is closed and the tank is ready to fire is about 3.84~ secs
Use your brain please
Even if it were 400mm of RHA, my T90, my Leopard, and my Leclerc would still penetrate it, so what’s the difference? And besides, I highly doubt we’ll have all that RHA there.
It would help against autocannons, it’s not meant to stop MBT APFSDS.
It’s gaijin’s fault that they implemented the turret ring half assedly, making it volumetric would be a great start.
Also no one is seriously expecting it to suddenly stop MBT rounds, most people just want it fixed so that the Abrams isn’t a free kill for any and every autocannon.
we are gonna ignore the fact it took 10 seconds flat for the autoloader picking the ammo
you clearly dont understand how the game works
because it would produce much less spalling
and not be an easy 1 shot for autocannons
I didn’t say it’s false, nor that it’s true, don’t try to distort things. I said it’s not proven because it’s restricted.
Bro thinks the cyclogram I posted is fabricated, he doesn’t lmao
For me it looks VERY real too,tell that to the Russian mains please,since they stated being fake
I’m not ignoring anything. The game doesn’t model different shell types in different areas of the auto loader.
If it did. They would add 0.28 secs per shell pass over to the reload.
It’s okay chaps. We need to find a dodgy marketing brochure (preferably Cyrillic) and all will be good.
That’s fair, however, in the case of the hull armor, it was only changed in the SEP V3.
On that note it should have already come to the game but Gaijin is Gaijin. I guess the question is how much that improvement is. (Would be nice if Russia tested the NERA on the captured Ukrainian M1A1s to see if WT is accurate or not
)
Hey otter. You do know in the history of the tank, there was only two prototypes right?
So how could three tanks exist, unless they removed the gun and up gunned one, just as they had! Shocker! Then the renamed it.
Therefore making the original tank no longer exist.
Edit: let’s not forget about the M6A2E1 which has fake armor values, and never was more than a mockup.
again false
we have a number of budget documents talking about abrams armor improvements that indicate improvements to the hull front armor
Simple question. Is there a T29 made out of REAL metal that you can visit IN PERSON and look at, and touch, and everything…?
It isn’t a trick question.
