Abrams only had its chassis armor altered in the SRP V3 version. Until US players prove that others also had alterations (which they can’t because it’s restricted), then nothing will change. And besides, what fault does Gaijin have if Abrams has such an obvious weak point in the turret ring? I believe a shot there would be fatal for the crew, even if it were a shot from a humble RPG-7. As for the Bushmaster, I don’t know; he’s fine in my Vilkas.
it has been proven
multiple times
and gaijins argument about the suspension has also been proven to be false within a week of them saying it
because it only has it due to their poor modeling
it should be 200-300mm RHA equivalent volumetric armor instead of a single 50mm plate
Im pretty sure people explained and showed countless proofs that the Abrams have way better armor than its current state,if that for you aint enough…tf you want us to do?You want me to go to Donald Trump and make a vlog where he states everything by himself to make “True” for yall?
What? I’m talking about the abrams.
Also, here’s the full Cyclogram data:
NICE RANDOM DISCORD PIC. Also, nice lying bro 10/10
Where do you think I got the Cyclogram from??
1 Like
They’ll just say, “No, the T80 takes a full day to reload, while our NATO tanks do it in just one second.”
2 Likes
Ah so ur here just to argue for the sake of it.
No, I remember when this was the main topic on the forum, there was nothing but a mention that it had been tested, so nothing is proven.
They do that for the BMPs.
Ace and expert reload rates are THE SAME for all manual loaders in WT with 120s (except for Challies).
NICE RANDOM DISCORD PIC. Also, nice lying bro 10/10
Lmao, you should spend some time outside ngl, that cyclogram was posted on the RU forum, that’s where I got it from, if you wanna I can even message the guy who posted it for you on discord :P
They do that for the BMPs.
BMP-3s*
The BMD-4s are unaffected (i have the event one lol) and obv BMP-2s aren’t affected by it either.
Im not talking about reloads here,the video aboved that @UniqueScorpions-live showed me for some reason and tagged me even tho…i wasnt part of that discussion,shows it reload in like 11 seconds if you imagine the gun shooting the previous shell and discarding it
That means,we have video,Gaijin should implement it
From the time the round it picked up, and th breech is closed and the tank is ready to fire is about 3.84~ secs
Use your brain please
2 Likes
Even if it were 400mm of RHA, my T90, my Leopard, and my Leclerc would still penetrate it, so what’s the difference? And besides, I highly doubt we’ll have all that RHA there.
It would help against autocannons, it’s not meant to stop MBT APFSDS.
1 Like
It’s gaijin’s fault that they implemented the turret ring half assedly, making it volumetric would be a great start.
Also no one is seriously expecting it to suddenly stop MBT rounds, most people just want it fixed so that the Abrams isn’t a free kill for any and every autocannon.
2 Likes
we are gonna ignore the fact it took 10 seconds flat for the autoloader picking the ammo
you clearly dont understand how the game works
because it would produce much less spalling
and not be an easy 1 shot for autocannons
I didn’t say it’s false, nor that it’s true, don’t try to distort things. I said it’s not proven because it’s restricted.
Bro thinks the cyclogram I posted is fabricated, he doesn’t lmao