Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

Quite a bit. Take the Iranian 5th Gen Fighter.

Looks great! Until you realise it’s made of cardboard. Plus it’s about 25% too small to actually carry a pilot (unless the IRAF start employing toddlers as pilots). Edit out the surroundings and put it in a brochure - surely it meets the exact same reqs as Gaijin used for KH-38.

Russian has a long and storied history of wheeling out very good looking stuff - only for it to a) not exist as a functioning weapon or b) it not working when the other side shoot back.

Mockups =/= Functional Weapons Systems

2 Likes

This changes Gunjobs conclusion, that in his opinion there is enough evidence to keep the missile in the game ?
Okay then.

It doesn’t but his conclusion also doesn’t change the fact that the 38MT no business being on the planes it’s on in game

No, it just has to be technically compatible. and because su30sm is a derivative of 30mki, it falls under technicality rules of being able of being added to it.
(IRL su-30sm doesn’t have kh38, it’s not integrated and I agree that it shouldnt have it, but on a technical compatibility, its fair game. Gaijin picks and chooses when to adhere to this rule, but in this case it’s technically compatible)
image
The only fixed wing planes that actually has kh-38 irl are su-35 and su-34 and mig 29

Spoiler


image

1 Like

IMG_1592

1 Like

that’'s what i said earlier, giajin picks and chooses when to adhere to this rule. theyre inconsistent as hell on it.
IMO they just wanted to just give kh38 as many carriers as possible

Yeah weird as fuck tho that only Russia gets it in a positive way. Go ask for more hosbo on the tornado or quad racks on the golden eagle if you think otherwise

5 Likes

yeah ik, and i don’t agree with what gaijin does becuase theyre inconsistent (looks at you swedish f-18/fa18s)

1 Like

I think I know where the confusion comes from

I posted mockups, you said they don’t look like the things in your photo. That could have been taken one of two ways - 1) The thing in your photo isn’t a mockup or 2) The mockup in your photo doesn’t look like the mockups I posted.

I took it as 1, perhaps you meant 2 but who knows.

To be clear -

Noone is taking a real missile to a trade show, any photo purporting to show a kh-38mt at a trade show is most certainly a mockup. And no, noone is taking a very valuable seeker head and putting it onto a mockup missile body and then taking that to a trade show.

Seekers can of course be removed from weapons, its required for maintenance etc.

if you want an image of the actual seekerhead, here it is, but who knows of its a mockup or not (I think its a mockup)
image

They did.

They wanted to give russia a longer range IR missile and so just made the thing up.

It wouldn’t be so infuriating if they were just honest.

5 Likes

kid named relikt

1 Like

Gaijin coming out and saying: “yeah russia gets preferential treatment and fake stuff, because otherwise they wouldnt be competitive” would be so funny

3 Likes

They’ll admit it one day xD

If the game keeps adding more and more modern stuff theyll probably have to once we hit actual, properly modeled 2000s western equipment consistently

If they are going to delude people into thinking modern russian Naval or Air assets are better than the Chinese or NATO equivalents then we’re in for a rough ride

Well theres only so much bs that they can get away with. Rn it works but every modern addition at this point will either make the bias more obvious or create a gap that the ussr tree cant close

1 Like

Stealth alone is a big yikes

1 Like

Pretty much everything will be a big yikes

Buk is good, but far from the best. His size on crappy maps hinders him, the radar is strange, he struggles with multipath even with plenty of explosives, and helicopters bully him.

1 Like