Germany has had FnF missiles for years, so now they’re last in line to complain.
Your useless screenshot shows nothing but “destroyed.” After all, if you had hit a missile and then had to return to the helipad to rearm and then get back into action, there would be a time difference between the hits. And i talking abount the BUK not the Lmur
Hi, hello, strictly speaking yes. KMW’s onw slides show that 2A7s have MUCH HIGHER protection than the Strv 122s, but Gaijin insists that its the other way around, and books from the project manager of the 2A7Vs hull was to be AT LEAST equally protected to the turret (it isn’t by a mile), and based on the Swedish graphs, all up-armored Leo 2s are in fact lacking MUCH of their armor, as much as ~600 - 800mm when it comes to CE protection, and a bunch of KE protection in wider arcs.
1 Like
A prototype tank made to test a 120mm gun with countless photos and documents somehow its fake for Russia mains
1 Like
Yes, but weaker f&f helis such as Tiger, Jewhawk and A129 should not be same BR as the new ones in my opinion.
Lol. Is 2 whole minutes between kills not enough of a time difference, and how I only got a single whole kill after firing 8 PARS 3s during my 2nd sortie? :D
1 Like
He destroyed everyone with one shot except for Pantsir and T90M.
Yes, you do. Why didn’t the US have FnF like Germany? It makes perfect sense. They had those Tiger figures with Fairy Tail for so long, and now other nations have better toys. That’s why they’re jealous because their toys aren’t as cool anymore, and they complain nonstop.
You is saying that Lmur doesn’t exist, is that right? I was literally banned from the forum for a couple of days for showing him in action in a certain conflict, lol.
And didn’t kill 3 other guys that had to be finished by others, so uh, congrats?
What’s your point here? Are you trying to defend the LMUR or just arguing for the sake of arguing? Objectively a NM or 64E have to put in FAR LESS effort to achieve what I did.
Legit all the tanks the US has at top tier and not even…starting from at least 8.3 its legit nerfed to the ground trying their best to make it a bad nation when its not…you got proof,you got documents,you got videos…stories…but that doesnt matter for Gaijin,since as long its Russia,they will implement anything that russian mains says,even if those are not confirmed at all by anyone in specific
This is something that doesnt happen to NATO tanks for example…let me why homeboy
It’s not 6.0 seconds? Hmm… cyclogram data disagrees.
There’s a lot more to unpack there, but gaijin doesn’t model certain shell types and how they are loaded.
Secondly. NATO reloads have been shown to over preform. Most manual loaders manage about 5.8-6.5 secs
Most of those videos people send, the loader keeps the door open, has no body armor on etc. making them fake reloads.
2 Likes
Honestly, I don’t care about your whining. Other nations have better toys now, and so that no one says I’m only on one side, I hope that the gaijin give more buffs to the Z10, the AH64, and the Mi-28NM.
Didnt know tankers have level 5 body armor
Every time I read new posts on this thread I lose more hope with the community. Now people are bringing up mid tier vehicles in a discussion specifically about top tier to justify their arguments. What’s the point of tags anymore if no one cares about them.
1 Like
What can Russian tanks do that M1s can’t?
What are you even on about, am i living rent free in your head that it took you a week to comeback n respond.(also bro exaggerating 1 week when it was like 3 days lmao)
Exactly
The Abrams are legit trash moduled,missing pieces of armor…
Light vehicles have nerfed to the ground reload rate or made their gun shoot pees instead of APDS rounds
And with the shooting pees statment im refering to the Bushamaster,how come the Bushmaster cant pen anything for shit from sides/behind even tho im using APDS?
If you even manage to pen something with that gun,you will most probably just scratch a module inside of the tank youre shooting at
The only Bushmaster than somewhat works its the one the EFV has,that Bushmaster when it shoots,its actually damaged vehicles surprisingly
5.8s is better than ACE tier reload in WT and 6.5s is only slightly slower than “expert” in WT, lol?
So “most manual loaders” manage between better than ace and about expert, waow.
It’s not 6.0 seconds? Hmm… cyclogram data disagrees.
Oki.
Also funny, here’s the whole cyclogram for what you posted:
It shows that it takes longer for them to load ATGMs (roughly 7.5s if they’re the next in sequance), but we don’t have that in WT, do we?
Tell me exactly how long you think an MZ loader is.
12 seconds…maybe make it 11/10