Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

[SwingfireOP]

Not gonna lie, gaijin baffles me a lot of the time.

Removal of stuff is clearly on their radar (japanese jets as the most recent example) so its not like they’ve forgotten about these things. There must be other criteria for their removal. Perhaps its something as simple as removal without a replacement would make progression through that rank too fast, or they want a rough equivalent vehicle so that they don’t have to refund people’s RP and GE, they can just do a swap.

Tbh, it’s probably the latter, gaijin aren’t known for their generosity.

[I_MiikaL_I]

Their criteria for removal is that the gaps in the tech tree were sufficiently filled (R2Y2 replaced with Thai F-84)

[Whisloy]

@SwingfireOP

Noone is destroying a real weapon with a real seeker in order to take it to a trade show.

@Whisloy

No you literally said that to find missile seeker you must dismantle existing missile which is complete nonsence.

@SwingfireOP

No I did not.

This is just stupid.

@I MiikaL I@live

Go and read my ultimatum

It’s horrible 0/10

@SwingfireOP

You really don’t undertand much do you? You’re making the claim it exists against all the currently available information. Its on you to back up that claim.

Only information is “I didn’t see so it doesn’t exist”

[I_MiikaL_I]

Well frankly, you are offering nothing but a floppy argument and offering little to nothing of substance, people will just ignore you if you keep baiting

[NoylDestroyer_St]

Removing the HoRi production wont hurt anyone not gonna lie
It wont make it easier,GRB tech tree take ages compared to air tech tree so no,easier to get top tier not at all
Gaijin will continue to profit for leaving the HoRi Proto as premium like its currently listen

At least the HoRi Proto “has more sense” as its listen at proto and not an actual production vehicle which the other HoRi never was

[kosthar4uk]

@SwingfireOP

You’re making the claim it exists against all the currently available information.

The main question is: why make about 5 full-size layouts?

[H_ngma]

@NoylDestroyer_St

Not comparing,just saying there are other fake stuff to remove too WHICH they REFUSE to and using a stupid excuse too

@NoylDestroyer_St

You keep saying its a comparison,its not…stop using that word thank you

You saying „no comparison“ doesn’t make it less of a comparison.

@NoylDestroyer_St

If the F16AJ was fake,it should get the same treatment

100% agree there’s no need for it with the F2 and the subtrees now

[SwingfireOP]

@Whisloy

This is just stupid.

You clearly have reading comprehension issues, which explains a lot about your responses in this thread.

[NoylDestroyer_St]

Removing the completely fake tank that NEVER even made it to blueprint versions shouldnt follow the criteria regardless

The line its already full of vehicles
As they did with Panther 2,Coellion and Tiger 2,should do the same with the HoRi Production

EDIT : if you look at the screens i sent before,it really wouldnt hurt anyone to remove it from the tech tree,keep the HoRi Proto where it is and remove the tech tree one which make 0 sense in every single universe

[H_ngma]

Dude I agree, the ho ri should go but I’m not gaijin so I have no idea why it’s still there other than that gaijin thinks it’s needed

[NoylDestroyer_St]

They vbeen proved wrong countless times,all im saying its just they are more biased towards some countries failing to follow criteria

But if the US for example needs an adjustment or sum? ““No,we need 405 documents,193 videos to prove its real”” type shit

Even if we continue to argue here,prob wont do any good regardless,since they rarely listen

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

@I MiikaL I@live

Rusbots when they get a single nod of approval to continue their CAS reign of terror smh

That really hurt, comming from someone who cries about 2S38 beeing op.

[SwingfireOP]

He was talking about the brochure, and the discussion around the brohure being faked.

[Alpharius11348]

wow, critical thinking is hard isnt it

you know that is just saying that there is a chance the image is real despite it looking obviously photo shopped

and isnt even addressing that those are clearly mockup missiles which doesnt meet gaijins standard of evidence

[H_ngma]

I mean were not really arguing here. I absolutely agree with you that the Ho ri needs to go asap and the F16AJ with it. I’m just saying that they’re both not really a good comparison to the KH38MT

@NoylDestroyer_St

But if the US for example needs an adjustment or sum? ““No,we need 405 documents,193 videos to prove its real”” type shit

Yeah the amount and quality of sources needed for some stuff is insane if you compare it to some Russian thingies

[Whisloy]

@I MiikaL I@live

Well frankly, you are offering nothing but a floppy argument and offering little to nothing of substance, people will just ignore you if you keep baiting

And if you keep making claims without evidence then no one will listen to you.

@SwingfireOP

You clearly have reading comprehension issues, which explains a lot about your responses in this thread.

So why manufacturer must destroy missile to get it’s seeker ?

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

@SwingfireOP

He was talking about the brochure, and the discussion around the brohure being faked.

And how does that change his conclusion ?

[SwingfireOP]

@Whisloy

So why manufacturer must destroy missile to get it’s seeker ?

The weapon would be destroyed by removing the fuel.

THE FUEL

F
U
E
L

It was pointing out how absurd your idea that they carted a real missile into the trade show.

You then pivoted to them installing a real seeker into a mockup body, which is just as absurd.

[SwingfireOP]

I was just making sure everyone knew he was talking about the brochure, just so no-one took it out of context because that would be bad, right?

[Whisloy]

@SwingfireOP

It was pointing out how absurd your idea that they carted a real missile into the trade show.

Which never happen since i stateted that it could be mockup with real seeker.