‘We believe’ and ‘Marketing Lie’ are some classic Gaijin cope statements, it’s a real shame the dev team seems to have an agenda towards certain areas of the game, a real shame
The missile isn’t unbalanced, it’s just modern warfare, CAS players deserve to suffer through it. Aside from that, the Buk is useless on most maps, only good on large maps “like I love using the Buk in advance on Reno”.
1 Like
NGL the LMUR is BUSTED. I’ve seen so many people compare it to PARS 3LR and so I decided to take out my UHT, and it took me 20+ PARS to score FIVE KILLS.
I had to land 3 times to get the same amount of kills a 28NM gets within a single full missile dump, some (in particular T-series for some reason) would soak up 3 whole PARS 3 to the face before finally doing the “peace out im outta here”.
So I don’t get told that I’m making this up:
I fired 2 PARS on most of them just so I could guarantee myself the kill and for some it wasn’t enough (like the T-90M, and the T-80U took either 2 or 3 to the face as well).
It’s genuinely insane how KHT is at the same BR as AH-64E and 28NM when its direct counterpart in the French TT is at 12.3 lmaoooo
5 Likes
give it a week, that’ll be fixed (I’m assuming we see the update next week).
-
kungstiger, Heavy tank no.6 etc , technically the T29 doesn’t exist, or it does depending on how you view it since they removed the gun and added the 155mm which is the T30. Etc.
-
It’s not coping…? Cmon bro I had more respect for you. Mission failed respect -. What other things are inconsistent for USA for example?
Just shove the Helipads 90 km further away from the battle ground so Helies cant just shoot stuff and re arm before the missile even hit
Didn’t they already say that the baguette Tiger is also going 13.0 ?
I hit a Russian ufp with era, on the t-80u-e1. It hit his fuel and he exploded 😂
@Ghost_of_TelAviv was witness haha
1 Like
I’m away for work for 5 - 6 days a week so idk, i’m not up to date :/
Holy moly,what i have just read
Im not sure either i just thought so.
The reload rate for MZ autoloaders… isn’t even wrong? It can take much longer or shorter depending on “how far away the next indexed projectile” is, Gaijin went with a middle ground of I think +1 projectile, and some cyclograms even shows avg reload combat speeds of 7.5 - 8s, so cherrypicking a cyclogram that shows the fastest possible reload speed is nothing more than that, cherrypicking, it’s like NATO mains sending videos of stationary Leo 2s/M1s firing a round every 2 - 3 seconds when in actual combat it can take between 5 to 8 or even more seconds esp if the tank’s moving, Gaijin here also went with a middle ground so IMO it’s pretty fair.
1 Like
Well if they do then ngl, they should throw the LDIRCM helis even higher, atp if anything has a feature that allows it to be vastly better than their next closest equivalent should be higher, incl uparmored Leo 2s especially.
1 Like
So when it comes to russia,when something or someone unknown to the whole earth says the reload for (tank name) its 3 seconds we are gonna implement it cause thats enough proof
When it comes to Nato,we dont implement anything even tho we have countless proofs,images,videos and documents…
Weird how that goes huh…
1 Like
You said that Russia is the only one being artificially nerfed, which is just not true.
For examples the Abrams turret ring has still been half assedly implemented and Gaijin has made no moves to fix it. According to documents that the German players found the 2A7 should have better protection, but Gaijin insists to use a source that predates the vehicle by 20-25 years (but there are more knowledgable people here that can talk about that).
There are pictures etc of it so I count it as existing, otherwise every prototype that doesn’t have a model left in a museum somewhere is also a fake tank since they got scrapped afterwards.
Germany has had FnF missiles for years, so now they’re last in line to complain.
Your useless screenshot shows nothing but “destroyed.” After all, if you had hit a missile and then had to return to the helipad to rearm and then get back into action, there would be a time difference between the hits. And i talking abount the BUK not the Lmur
Hi, hello, strictly speaking yes. KMW’s onw slides show that 2A7s have MUCH HIGHER protection than the Strv 122s, but Gaijin insists that its the other way around, and books from the project manager of the 2A7Vs hull was to be AT LEAST equally protected to the turret (it isn’t by a mile), and based on the Swedish graphs, all up-armored Leo 2s are in fact lacking MUCH of their armor, as much as ~600 - 800mm when it comes to CE protection, and a bunch of KE protection in wider arcs.
1 Like
A prototype tank made to test a 120mm gun with countless photos and documents somehow its fake for Russia mains
1 Like
Yes, but weaker f&f helis such as Tiger, Jewhawk and A129 should not be same BR as the new ones in my opinion.