Remember when they said they don’t believe M829A3 is effective against modern ERA and armor
1 Like
They said they dont believe Leopard 2A7Vs composite (German armor) is better than Strv 122s composite (also German armor but 30 years older), lol.
Their logic is funny.
I remember this banger
Multiple sources but no, “clear marketing lie”. Hypocrisy and double standards at work.
8 Likes
Yep I have to be honest the missile itself is insanely busted but it’s almost completely counteracted by the fact that the BUK is the freest kill in the game. If you see an inch of launch tubing poking up, say bye bye lol. Even 7.62 kills it.
‘We believe’ and ‘Marketing Lie’ are some classic Gaijin cope statements, it’s a real shame the dev team seems to have an agenda towards certain areas of the game, a real shame
1 Like
The missile isn’t unbalanced, it’s just modern warfare, CAS players deserve to suffer through it. Aside from that, the Buk is useless on most maps, only good on large maps “like I love using the Buk in advance on Reno”.
1 Like
NGL the LMUR is BUSTED. I’ve seen so many people compare it to PARS 3LR and so I decided to take out my UHT, and it took me 20+ PARS to score FIVE KILLS.
I had to land 3 times to get the same amount of kills a 28NM gets within a single full missile dump, some (in particular T-series for some reason) would soak up 3 whole PARS 3 to the face before finally doing the “peace out im outta here”.
So I don’t get told that I’m making this up:
I fired 2 PARS on most of them just so I could guarantee myself the kill and for some it wasn’t enough (like the T-90M, and the T-80U took either 2 or 3 to the face as well).
It’s genuinely insane how KHT is at the same BR as AH-64E and 28NM when its direct counterpart in the French TT is at 12.3 lmaoooo
6 Likes
give it a week, that’ll be fixed (I’m assuming we see the update next week).
-
kungstiger, Heavy tank no.6 etc , technically the T29 doesn’t exist, or it does depending on how you view it since they removed the gun and added the 155mm which is the T30. Etc.
-
It’s not coping…? Cmon bro I had more respect for you. Mission failed respect -. What other things are inconsistent for USA for example?
Just shove the Helipads 90 km further away from the battle ground so Helies cant just shoot stuff and re arm before the missile even hit
Didn’t they already say that the baguette Tiger is also going 13.0 ?
I hit a Russian ufp with era, on the t-80u-e1. It hit his fuel and he exploded 😂
@Ghost_of_TelAviv was witness haha
1 Like
I’m away for work for 5 - 6 days a week so idk, i’m not up to date :/
Holy moly,what i have just read
Im not sure either i just thought so.
The reload rate for MZ autoloaders… isn’t even wrong? It can take much longer or shorter depending on “how far away the next indexed projectile” is, Gaijin went with a middle ground of I think +1 projectile, and some cyclograms even shows avg reload combat speeds of 7.5 - 8s, so cherrypicking a cyclogram that shows the fastest possible reload speed is nothing more than that, cherrypicking, it’s like NATO mains sending videos of stationary Leo 2s/M1s firing a round every 2 - 3 seconds when in actual combat it can take between 5 to 8 or even more seconds esp if the tank’s moving, Gaijin here also went with a middle ground so IMO it’s pretty fair.
1 Like
Well if they do then ngl, they should throw the LDIRCM helis even higher, atp if anything has a feature that allows it to be vastly better than their next closest equivalent should be higher, incl uparmored Leo 2s especially.
1 Like
So when it comes to russia,when something or someone unknown to the whole earth says the reload for (tank name) its 3 seconds we are gonna implement it cause thats enough proof
When it comes to Nato,we dont implement anything even tho we have countless proofs,images,videos and documents…
Weird how that goes huh…
1 Like
You said that Russia is the only one being artificially nerfed, which is just not true.
For examples the Abrams turret ring has still been half assedly implemented and Gaijin has made no moves to fix it. According to documents that the German players found the 2A7 should have better protection, but Gaijin insists to use a source that predates the vehicle by 20-25 years (but there are more knowledgable people here that can talk about that).
There are pictures etc of it so I count it as existing, otherwise every prototype that doesn’t have a model left in a museum somewhere is also a fake tank since they got scrapped afterwards.