You saying „no comparison“ doesn’t make it less of a comparison.
100% agree there’s no need for it with the F2 and the subtrees now
You clearly have reading comprehension issues, which explains a lot about your responses in this thread.
1 Like
Removing the completely fake tank that NEVER even made it to blueprint versions shouldnt follow the criteria regardless
The line its already full of vehicles
As they did with Panther 2,Coellion and Tiger 2,should do the same with the HoRi Production
EDIT : if you look at the screens i sent before,it really wouldnt hurt anyone to remove it from the tech tree,keep the HoRi Proto where it is and remove the tech tree one which make 0 sense in every single universe
Dude I agree, the ho ri should go but I’m not gaijin so I have no idea why it’s still there other than that gaijin thinks it’s needed
That really hurt, comming from someone who cries about 2S38 beeing op.
He was talking about the brochure, and the discussion around the brohure being faked.
wow, critical thinking is hard isnt it
you know that is just saying that there is a chance the image is real despite it looking obviously photo shopped
and isnt even addressing that those are clearly mockup missiles which doesnt meet gaijins standard of evidence
I mean were not really arguing here. I absolutely agree with you that the Ho ri needs to go asap and the F16AJ with it. I’m just saying that they’re both not really a good comparison to the KH38MT
Yeah the amount and quality of sources needed for some stuff is insane if you compare it to some Russian thingies
1 Like
And if you keep making claims without evidence then no one will listen to you.
So why manufacturer must destroy missile to get it’s seeker ?
And how does that change his conclusion ?
The weapon would be destroyed by removing the fuel.
THE FUEL
F
U
E
L
It was pointing out how absurd your idea that they carted a real missile into the trade show.
You then pivoted to them installing a real seeker into a mockup body, which is just as absurd.
I was just making sure everyone knew he was talking about the brochure, just so no-one took it out of context because that would be bad, right?
1 Like
Which never happen since i stateted that it could be mockup with real seeker.
Which it isn’t… Next
Quite a bit. Take the Iranian 5th Gen Fighter.
Looks great! Until you realise it’s made of cardboard. Plus it’s about 25% too small to actually carry a pilot (unless the IRAF start employing toddlers as pilots). Edit out the surroundings and put it in a brochure - surely it meets the exact same reqs as Gaijin used for KH-38.
Russian has a long and storied history of wheeling out very good looking stuff - only for it to a) not exist as a functioning weapon or b) it not working when the other side shoot back.
Mockups =/= Functional Weapons Systems
2 Likes
This changes Gunjobs conclusion, that in his opinion there is enough evidence to keep the missile in the game ?
Okay then.
It doesn’t but his conclusion also doesn’t change the fact that the 38MT no business being on the planes it’s on in game
No, it just has to be technically compatible. and because su30sm is a derivative of 30mki, it falls under technicality rules of being able of being added to it.
(IRL su-30sm doesn’t have kh38, it’s not integrated and I agree that it shouldnt have it, but on a technical compatibility, its fair game. Gaijin picks and chooses when to adhere to this rule, but in this case it’s technically compatible)
The only fixed wing planes that actually has kh-38 irl are su-35 and su-34 and mig 29
1 Like
1 Like
that’'s what i said earlier, giajin picks and chooses when to adhere to this rule. theyre inconsistent as hell on it.
IMO they just wanted to just give kh38 as many carriers as possible