1 ) The only seeker photos are mockups
2) Even if it was a real seeker (it isn’t), that still wouldn’t be enough for it to be in game. It would require a complete, functional weapon mounted on the exact varient of the plane in question. Many weapons have been denied in the past due to that, the KH-38MT also fails it, why is this one special?
tldr - Noone is mounting a real seeker to a mockup body to take to a trade show. Noone is destroying a real weapon with a real seeker in order to take it to a trade show.
EDIT : Still dont wanna compare them since one its a whole ass tank,the other its just a missile to be used on an already existing Heli
Not really stupid if you think about it,one can be argued to be a toy mock up
The other never existed even in the blueprints
And IF it did,it was NEVER meant to look like that with those specifications
This’ll be my last interaction with you, since you are trolling.
It’s in game because gaijin wants it to be, they refuse to provide the sources they used or evidence to support the addition, if they did any of that we’d not be arguing currently
No the comparison doesn’t make sense, because one was added to a much younger game where it was needed for the tree and gaijins rules were not as strict. The other one got added when vehicles already got removed, because they don’t comply with the rules for addition. Additionally the kh38mt doesn’t even fulfill the general rules for addition on the planes its currently on even if it existed
You know what the possibly most absurd part of the KH-38MT is?
Its own marketing brochure (which is the only information about its proposed capabilities) shows its proposed stats are far exceeded by the implementation in game.
The marketing brocure, which again is the only information, is insufficient to raise a bug report about the lock range and tracking ability on the MT.
So, can’t get it fixed because it’s too paper. Its utterly absurd.
Didnt Gaijin themself stated that they will remove fictional stuff from the game?They removed the R2Y2 planes when those planes had a mock up made with wood
They removed germany tanks cause “unrealistic”
They DO NOT want to remove a vehicle which goes against ANYTHING they continue to state and refuse to take the same action they did to other vehicles/planes
Yes? They said they will remove every fake as soon as the situation in the tech tree allows them to. Apparently that situation is not there with the ho ri
What you mean special ? Kh-38 is a modular missile only question here is it’s seeker which picture we have.
Special, as somehow this fictional weapon is added to aircraft when they couldn’t have mounted it because it doesnt’ exist. Why? Why should this one be allowed when many other weapons for planes have been denied due to it.
If you don’t understand, or can’t comprehend arguing in english, then that’s fine.
But you have done literally nothing to defend your stance or counter our argument. It’s a rule of thumb that you provide the sources because you are defending the existence of said missile.
We, as the accusers are using logical and common sense to deduct, that from the extremely limited (lacklustre) info we’ve found about the existence of the missile, combined with the absence from the russian export site, and gaijin’s mysterious hesitance to give us any of their info about the missile to the community, to show that the KH-38MT, as we see it in game, is a fictional missile.
TLDR: Nothing suggests the KH-38MT is real, any source you will likely cough up will have been debunked, and we’re waiting for Gaijin’s info since they claim they used that to add the missile, but won’t share it with us, suspicious no?
The ho-ri absolutely should not be in game. At the same time, the standards were different then but even so, thats no excuse for keeping it there all this time.
I want all fake stuff gone. If it leaves a gap in a nations capability so be it.
