Because you are making the claim the weapon exists when all the evidence points to it not existing.
You can prove a positive, can’t prove the negative so logically the burden of proof falls on you.
1 Like
Why i need to do such claim if Kh-38 is already in the game ?
Either there is a language or intellect barrier between us, which is it hm?
lolol
You think they took a very valuable seeker, and installed it on a mockup? IR seekers for missiles in that class are very expensive. Infact, thats probably the reason it never left the mockup stage in the first place.
Again, why? Why not just use the mockup they already have?
You’re really streching now.
3 Likes
Because we’re talking about the real world.
You made the claim the KH-38MT exists. Its on you to back it up.
Well because at that time they were thought to be permanent to fill a gap. The kh38mt was added in a time where fake stuff already got removed for being fake. That’s the difference between the Japanese/german stuff and the kh38mt. The only thing that might be similar is the F16AJ but even that one predates the subtree that would have offered a real alternative
“russian bias” only works cause volumetric being absolute dogwater
Some Nato tanks even tho powerful,have modules made like crap compared the russian ones because they NEEDED to nerf them,like of course Gaijin had to nerf to the ground the Abrams,one of the most incomplete tanks in gaijin history IMO
Said so,the engine of the game has to be redesigned,over so many years,the game falls apart on itself…
Too many bugs,too many issues and with the aggravating of the fact that some tanks/planes/helies are too broken to put the final blow on us players
Japan should lose instantly the HoRi production
One of the fakest tanks ever to exist
100% agree but comparing a ww2 tank added in 2017 to 2010s missile added after fake vehicles got removed is stupid
Maybe because mockup look without seeker looks like a toy.
Picture of seeker is not enough ?
a picture of a likely non functional mockup seeker is nowhere near enough
Not comparing,just saying there are other fake stuff to remove too WHICH they REFUSE to and using a stupid excuse too
Usually they want unclassified documents to prove how they work actually,so no,a picture wont work at all
Well it’s a lot better than “I didn’t see any secret documents about it so it’s must be fictional”
1 Like
Thats the big question though, is the 38MT any more than just a toy, answer is No
Yeah it’s stupid but I like said there’s an actual reason why we have those compared to the kh38mt
2 Likes
Well can you bring any proofs for your statement ?
You are baiting at this point,
You provide the evidence, not us
Come on man, that’s absurd.
Picture of seeker is not enough ?
No, because of the following reasons :
1 ) The only seeker photos are mockups
2) Even if it was a real seeker (it isn’t), that still wouldn’t be enough for it to be in game. It would require a complete, functional weapon mounted on the exact varient of the plane in question. Many weapons have been denied in the past due to that, the KH-38MT also fails it, why is this one special?
tldr - Noone is mounting a real seeker to a mockup body to take to a trade show. Noone is destroying a real weapon with a real seeker in order to take it to a trade show.
1 Like
Why ? You making the statement that it doesn’t exist while it’s is the game so you should provide the evidence