I think you’re right, lol
Circling back to a point I made about proving negatives:
Find me a video, image or document stating the successful live firing of a KH-38MT from an airbourne platform during any of the defense expos they’ve appeared in.
1 Like
So, lets be clear :
You think they took a working missile. Removed the warhead and then removed the solid rocket fuel.
The fuel which is poured into where it needs to be and then sets during the manufacturing process. This would destroy the weapon.
Why? What purpose would that serve? It would be an act of incredible stupidity. It’s a mockup, and almost certainly the same one we’ve seen in other photos.
3 Likes
Why so ? If you making a claim that Kh-38 doesn’t exist why burden of proof lies on me ?
Or Japan/Germany.
Same question for all dubious stuff from Japan ?
16AJ, Ho-Ris, Kikka with guns ?
I think we can all conclude your purpose in this conversation
2 Likes
Look it’s much easier they took mockup and placed seeker on it
The reason people claim it doesn’t exist is because there is very little to say it does, if I were claiming a widely used combat ready missile like AGM-65 didn’t exist then I would have to provide substantial evidence and reasoning, here though I need very little to deduct that the KH-38MT isn’t real
Because you are making the claim the weapon exists when all the evidence points to it not existing.
You can prove a positive, can’t prove the negative so logically the burden of proof falls on you.
1 Like
Why i need to do such claim if Kh-38 is already in the game ?
Either there is a language or intellect barrier between us, which is it hm?
lolol
You think they took a very valuable seeker, and installed it on a mockup? IR seekers for missiles in that class are very expensive. Infact, thats probably the reason it never left the mockup stage in the first place.
Again, why? Why not just use the mockup they already have?
You’re really streching now.
3 Likes
Because we’re talking about the real world.
You made the claim the KH-38MT exists. Its on you to back it up.
Well because at that time they were thought to be permanent to fill a gap. The kh38mt was added in a time where fake stuff already got removed for being fake. That’s the difference between the Japanese/german stuff and the kh38mt. The only thing that might be similar is the F16AJ but even that one predates the subtree that would have offered a real alternative
“russian bias” only works cause volumetric being absolute dogwater
Some Nato tanks even tho powerful,have modules made like crap compared the russian ones because they NEEDED to nerf them,like of course Gaijin had to nerf to the ground the Abrams,one of the most incomplete tanks in gaijin history IMO
Said so,the engine of the game has to be redesigned,over so many years,the game falls apart on itself…
Too many bugs,too many issues and with the aggravating of the fact that some tanks/planes/helies are too broken to put the final blow on us players
Japan should lose instantly the HoRi production
One of the fakest tanks ever to exist
100% agree but comparing a ww2 tank added in 2017 to 2010s missile added after fake vehicles got removed is stupid
Maybe because mockup look without seeker looks like a toy.
Picture of seeker is not enough ?
a picture of a likely non functional mockup seeker is nowhere near enough
Not comparing,just saying there are other fake stuff to remove too WHICH they REFUSE to and using a stupid excuse too