Oh yeah good idea SAHR missile instead of ARH missile good luck shooting something down in area when everything have FnF munition
1 Like
Kh38Mt sources are sufficient enough for the games addition. And the era in which the vehicles are designed don’t matter in this conversation.
Ok. Then we should also add realistic protection values for Russian vehicles, advanced Russian shells, and corrections and buffs to autoloader reload times. Automatic tracking of targets should be added too. All vehicles, especially modern ones, lack some capabilities. And NATO tanks are already better than Russian ones in game
2 Likes
The missile is realistic and accurate to it’s value. What do you want
What sources, they don’t exist, even the RU Military export site removed acknowledgement of it’s existence
It doesn’t exist bro, there is no documentation to go off, only rumors and a supposed test
It do exist. Search it up. Even a simple search tells you that the missiles do exist and that they use slanets ARH seeker head
There was a brochure for it I believe. Anyways then gaijin should just remove all experimental vehicles in the game
Literally not, no proof of testing, no proof that it was ever carried on the planes that carry it in game.
They dont but it is quite funny when a 50s vehicle has more pictures of it than a missile in the information age.
100% agree but i dont think we agree in the same way lol
such as?
Sure if we get corrections to manual loaders and autoloader damage corrections as well.
I really dont think you want to bring FCS and such things into this discussion lol
Yeah and they should be even better
3 Likes
Sources found with ‘A simple google search’ wouldn’t work to buff NATO vehicles would they?
Double standard no?
It isn’t a buff. It’s proof of existence
Of which there is little to none,
Only single reported test, sourced from a Russian news source, which are inherently untrustworthy
I don’t understand why some people feel the physical need to participate in discussions about BRs they don’t even own, especially when their player card can be consulted very easily. Are they just pathological liars or simply that biased? Boggle my mind.
So we should remove all experimental vehicles in game
Plenty of modern vehicles are highly classified. Try finding sources on the S500 for example.
3bm59
Autoloaders are literally worse than manual loaders right now.
But it is for realism?
1 Like
Little to no improvement over 3bm60
Experimental vehicles ≠ Fictional missiles
Laughs in Leclerc, Type 10, BVM, HSTVL, Pt16, strv 103, etc
1 Like
lmfao 😭
3BM59 is just a 3BM60 but in DU instead of Tungsten. It would change almost nothing and still be inferior to M829A2. Meanwhile, M829A3 would turn Kontakt-5 into dead weight and brute force Relikt. M829A4 would turn Relikt into dead weight. Russia has so much more to lose than the rest with up to date ammo loadout.
3 Likes
Still a round.
It’s the same things. And the kh38mt is in no way fictional.
Ok fair. Russian autoloaders are weak then
~10mm more pen is not worth another useless module to research
Feel free to prove us otherwise
How did you come to that conclusion? Those experimental vehicles exist. But weapons for everyone besides russia always need proof of testing and carriage.
Isnt that thing literally the same age as the 3bm60?
debatable.
Yeah but adding FCS and differences in optics to the game would make russian tanks even worse compared to western ones
It is 30 to 50. At least it would finally bring Russian shells to 600mm pen