Filling holes or not, dubious vehicles shouldn’t be added.
As for the second part, 38MT was the first IR missile RU had in the game. MA also had to be ARH to compete with others.
To prove they’re not dubious ? Of course.
While 9m317ma being statistically the best SAM missile in game?
Doesn’t scream ‘they added it just to remain competitive’
1 Like
BUK-M3 statistically best SAM in the game ?
Statisticically as in specs of the missile
Well come back when it’s starts actually performing better
1 Like
yeah thats why we dont get any anymore. The last non-russian fake added was the F16AJ iirc
So? 1. thats not a gap. 2. Do you see Gaijin making up IR missiles for china or anyone else for that matter?
Exactly, Russian bias is Gaijin adding dubious stuff to russia, because otherwise theyd not be competitive, thank you very much.
3 Likes
Performance is a result of players and in the BUK’s case, gaijin’s dogshit modelling of the radar.
The missile itself is ridiculous
1 Like
Never was, the KH-29T and TE were maverick equivalents before, but no Russia needed the best IR in the game (by a signifigant margin)
So you getting scared by something that isn’t happening ?
1 Like
I own the BUK, and yet I opposed it’s addition (9M317MA) since the beginning
So what ? it’s horrible radar makeing it almost useless your wish is it can better when it will be worse than now ?
1 Like
I want the radar buffed and missile nerfed, simple as
Oh yeah good idea SAHR missile instead of ARH missile good luck shooting something down in area when everything have FnF munition
1 Like
Kh38Mt sources are sufficient enough for the games addition. And the era in which the vehicles are designed don’t matter in this conversation.
Ok. Then we should also add realistic protection values for Russian vehicles, advanced Russian shells, and corrections and buffs to autoloader reload times. Automatic tracking of targets should be added too. All vehicles, especially modern ones, lack some capabilities. And NATO tanks are already better than Russian ones in game
2 Likes
The missile is realistic and accurate to it’s value. What do you want
What sources, they don’t exist, even the RU Military export site removed acknowledgement of it’s existence
It doesn’t exist bro, there is no documentation to go off, only rumors and a supposed test
It do exist. Search it up. Even a simple search tells you that the missiles do exist and that they use slanets ARH seeker head
There was a brochure for it I believe. Anyways then gaijin should just remove all experimental vehicles in the game
Literally not, no proof of testing, no proof that it was ever carried on the planes that carry it in game.
They dont but it is quite funny when a 50s vehicle has more pictures of it than a missile in the information age.
100% agree but i dont think we agree in the same way lol
such as?
Sure if we get corrections to manual loaders and autoloader damage corrections as well.
I really dont think you want to bring FCS and such things into this discussion lol
Yeah and they should be even better
3 Likes