There was a brochure for it I believe. Anyways then gaijin should just remove all experimental vehicles in the game
Literally not, no proof of testing, no proof that it was ever carried on the planes that carry it in game.
They dont but it is quite funny when a 50s vehicle has more pictures of it than a missile in the information age.
100% agree but i dont think we agree in the same way lol
such as?
Sure if we get corrections to manual loaders and autoloader damage corrections as well.
I really dont think you want to bring FCS and such things into this discussion lol
Yeah and they should be even better
3 Likes
Sources found with ‘A simple google search’ wouldn’t work to buff NATO vehicles would they?
Double standard no?
It isn’t a buff. It’s proof of existence
Of which there is little to none,
Only single reported test, sourced from a Russian news source, which are inherently untrustworthy
I don’t understand why some people feel the physical need to participate in discussions about BRs they don’t even own, especially when their player card can be consulted very easily. Are they just pathological liars or simply that biased? Boggle my mind.
So we should remove all experimental vehicles in game
Plenty of modern vehicles are highly classified. Try finding sources on the S500 for example.
3bm59
Autoloaders are literally worse than manual loaders right now.
But it is for realism?
1 Like
Little to no improvement over 3bm60
Experimental vehicles ≠ Fictional missiles
Laughs in Leclerc, Type 10, BVM, HSTVL, Pt16, strv 103, etc
1 Like
lmfao 😭
3BM59 is just a 3BM60 but in DU instead of Tungsten. It would change almost nothing and still be inferior to M829A2. Meanwhile, M829A3 would turn Kontakt-5 into dead weight and brute force Relikt. M829A4 would turn Relikt into dead weight. Russia has so much more to lose than the rest with up to date ammo loadout.
3 Likes
Still a round.
It’s the same things. And the kh38mt is in no way fictional.
Ok fair. Russian autoloaders are weak then
~10mm more pen is not worth another useless module to research
Feel free to prove us otherwise
How did you come to that conclusion? Those experimental vehicles exist. But weapons for everyone besides russia always need proof of testing and carriage.
Isnt that thing literally the same age as the 3bm60?
debatable.
Yeah but adding FCS and differences in optics to the game would make russian tanks even worse compared to western ones
It is 30 to 50. At least it would finally bring Russian shells to 600mm pen
Source would be nice?
I love how question about existence of seeker turned into complete fictional missile
‘Oh the seeker exists’ and ‘it’s a modular system’ are not proof of existence for the system we see in game, if theoretical configurations are denied for NATO tech, then why not for USSR stuff?
Do a search and you’ll see
That ‘logic’ doesn’t fly around here, you need solid sources to prove your point