BUK doesnt care about LDIRCM since its ARH, IRIS-T im not sure about how. maybe it got overloaded or something
Yeah I tried to hover like some people were talking about, but it didn’t work for me. Still got clapped.
The SLM straight up IOGed me even though I moved. Might have just been unlucky on my part though.
oddly realistic lol. since irl the Radar return from the main rotors of the heli gives the missile a very nice targeting solution
hmm, strange because IOG only really works in 2 dimensions and not three not to mention that the IRIS-T doesnt recieve DL updates after going into IR track mode.
perhaps you didnt move a lot?
1 Like
Yeah I guess so, probably moved not quite enough.
One day I’ll get good with the AH-64E, maybe when I actually take time to learn it instead of hopping between trees to grind stuff.
1 Like
Russian bias is not having the best things all the time. Its having good things that are
A. of dubious existence and/or have dubious capabilities
B. only good, because the competition is artificially made worse.
3 Likes
ive stopped grinding tbh. i almost exclusively play my beloved Jeff and my 11.0 germany lineup.
that GDR 22M4 does wonders when played right and its so satisfying inventing new techniques
1 Like
Doesn’t that apply to every nation then?
USA, Germany, Japan, and Sweden have plenty of “fake tanks” & the USA continues to get back to back premium Experimental vehicles. RAH-66 and the T-58 which well out preform their competition and are still their original br.
Secondly, the Russian reload speed of the MZ loader has been artificially nerfed to 6.5 seconds instead of its realistic 6.0 secs. Several sources / documents prove this.
Additionally the Hstvl, rdlft, and t58 got buffed to their true reload.
You got it twisted, only one getting artificially nerfed is Russia.
3 Likes
He’s mainly refering russian CAS/SPAA missiles and certain rounds being of dubious existence (eg 9M317MA, KH-38MT, 3OU8, etc) which just happen to be the best in their class and very hard to get nerfed becuase the documentation simply doesn’t exist.
As for artificially nerfed NATO stuff, thats been in the game since modern tech was added, so not worth complaining about
1 Like
Sure every nation has some of that but if you want a comparison you need like 5 tech trees to match the preferential treatment russia gets in that regard ive already done a comparison of that earlier that no RU main had an answer to.
Prototypes and experimental vehicles are fine, pulling missiles out of thin air isnt.
Reloads are all over the place in general thats nothing that only affects russia negatively.
Its not just in ground (looks at soyuz)
1 Like
I know the fake japanese tanks and the removed German ones, but which US tank is fake? All seem to at least have been built as prototypes.
This is coping into the other extreme lmao.
2 Likes
There’s probably a dozen vehicles from Japan/Germany that are of dubious existence.
1 Like
Your comment would have more gravitas if you included examples. Preferably some that are not 2016 additions in WW2 tier
1 Like
Why should year of introduction and tier matter ?
Dubious is dubious.
Of the top of my head, I can only think of the Zestorser 45 (though I believe it’s incorrectly named and said to be built) and Ostwind 2 as vehicles with dubious existence, everything else seems to be real or outright fake/inaccurate (R2Y2 V2+V3/Ho-ris/removed German tanks/F-16AJ)
I probably am incorrect though
1 Like
Because Gaijin changed their rules regarding those vehicles which is why they removed the german ones. And tier matters, because some design cooked up in WW2 probably has less, reliable info than a 2000s+ vehicle or missile especially when it comes to the basic question of: does/did it exist.
1 Like
in interesting russian nera how work +the fuel tanks on chinese tanks all time explode when is hitted…
The US and other trees also have such things. Such as the T58 tank.
Example? NATO tanks absolutely destroys any Soviet machine at 12.0
Its a mid 50s design and literally has more sources than the KH38MT, what are you even talking about?
Ridiculous armor on almost every NATO tank. Restriction to ammunition thats been out of service since before some tanks entered service. Selective addition of internal modules. Thats just from the top of my head im sure theres more especially if we look past tanks.
Just because NATO tanks are already better doesnt mean that they shouldnt be even better than rn.
3 Likes
So that’s why Japanese ones are still in the game or got removed very recently ?
Enforcing that rule only after several years seems very dubious to me.
And ?
If it’s dubious don’t add it.
1 Like