Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

Of the top of my head, I can only think of the Zestorser 45 (though I believe it’s incorrectly named and said to be built) and Ostwind 2 as vehicles with dubious existence, everything else seems to be real or outright fake/inaccurate (R2Y2 V2+V3/Ho-ris/removed German tanks/F-16AJ)

I probably am incorrect though

1 Like

Because Gaijin changed their rules regarding those vehicles which is why they removed the german ones. And tier matters, because some design cooked up in WW2 probably has less, reliable info than a 2000s+ vehicle or missile especially when it comes to the basic question of: does/did it exist.

2 Likes

in interesting russian nera how work +the fuel tanks on chinese tanks all time explode when is hitted…









The US and other trees also have such things. Such as the T58 tank.

Example? NATO tanks absolutely destroys any Soviet machine at 12.0

Its a mid 50s design and literally has more sources than the KH38MT, what are you even talking about?

Ridiculous armor on almost every NATO tank. Restriction to ammunition thats been out of service since before some tanks entered service. Selective addition of internal modules. Thats just from the top of my head im sure theres more especially if we look past tanks.
Just because NATO tanks are already better doesnt mean that they shouldnt be even better than rn.

4 Likes

So that’s why Japanese ones are still in the game or got removed very recently ?
Enforcing that rule only after several years seems very dubious to me.

And ?
If it’s dubious don’t add it.

1 Like

Yes? Gaijin literally told us when the german ones and the R2Y2 were removed that the reason was filling holes in the tree. The fake russian stuff isnt filling holes, its adding new capabilities at the top.

So vehicles from the 1940s should have the same basis of sources as things from the 2000s in your opinion?

1 Like

Funnily enough, they have been ripped from the game for the most part.

Oh dear, there goes the KH-38MT and 9M317MA then

1 Like

Filling holes or not, dubious vehicles shouldn’t be added.
As for the second part, 38MT was the first IR missile RU had in the game. MA also had to be ARH to compete with others.

To prove they’re not dubious ? Of course.

While 9m317ma being statistically the best SAM missile in game?
Doesn’t scream ‘they added it just to remain competitive’

1 Like

BUK-M3 statistically best SAM in the game ?

Statisticically as in specs of the missile

Well come back when it’s starts actually performing better

1 Like

yeah thats why we dont get any anymore. The last non-russian fake added was the F16AJ iirc

So? 1. thats not a gap. 2. Do you see Gaijin making up IR missiles for china or anyone else for that matter?

Exactly, Russian bias is Gaijin adding dubious stuff to russia, because otherwise theyd not be competitive, thank you very much.

3 Likes

Performance is a result of players and in the BUK’s case, gaijin’s dogshit modelling of the radar.

The missile itself is ridiculous

1 Like

Never was, the KH-29T and TE were maverick equivalents before, but no Russia needed the best IR in the game (by a signifigant margin)

So you getting scared by something that isn’t happening ?

1 Like

I own the BUK, and yet I opposed it’s addition (9M317MA) since the beginning

So what ? it’s horrible radar makeing it almost useless your wish is it can better when it will be worse than now ?

1 Like

I want the radar buffed and missile nerfed, simple as