As if AH64E and Z10ME weren’t indestructible as well, unless they fly high enough for ARH missiles to hit them.
2 Likes
Have you seen the Ldircm spheres? They’re all almost the same, except the MI-28NM has big gaps.
Also, the AH-64E over preforms in direct front / rear aspect.
you literally are ignoring on paper facts, showing your bias
“Claiming” and having actual evidence are two different things.
At this point your merely being a troll.
4 Likes
How are they more counterable, both of them have better LDIRCM than MI-28.
1 Like
What exactly are the op vehicles?
Destroyed modules doesn’t stop ammunition, this used to be a thing in the past however leaded to terrible experience on the shooter’s end, specially with vehicles that had a lot of modules not critical that could act as protection ignoring spall and projectile.
5 Likes
I think the AH-64E hates me since I have been shot down by iris-t and buks no matter what I try.
BUK doesnt care about LDIRCM since its ARH, IRIS-T im not sure about how. maybe it got overloaded or something
Yeah I tried to hover like some people were talking about, but it didn’t work for me. Still got clapped.
The SLM straight up IOGed me even though I moved. Might have just been unlucky on my part though.
oddly realistic lol. since irl the Radar return from the main rotors of the heli gives the missile a very nice targeting solution
hmm, strange because IOG only really works in 2 dimensions and not three not to mention that the IRIS-T doesnt recieve DL updates after going into IR track mode.
perhaps you didnt move a lot?
1 Like
Yeah I guess so, probably moved not quite enough.
One day I’ll get good with the AH-64E, maybe when I actually take time to learn it instead of hopping between trees to grind stuff.
1 Like
Russian bias is not having the best things all the time. Its having good things that are
A. of dubious existence and/or have dubious capabilities
B. only good, because the competition is artificially made worse.
4 Likes
ive stopped grinding tbh. i almost exclusively play my beloved Jeff and my 11.0 germany lineup.
that GDR 22M4 does wonders when played right and its so satisfying inventing new techniques
1 Like
Doesn’t that apply to every nation then?
USA, Germany, Japan, and Sweden have plenty of “fake tanks” & the USA continues to get back to back premium Experimental vehicles. RAH-66 and the T-58 which well out preform their competition and are still their original br.
Secondly, the Russian reload speed of the MZ loader has been artificially nerfed to 6.5 seconds instead of its realistic 6.0 secs. Several sources / documents prove this.
Additionally the Hstvl, rdlft, and t58 got buffed to their true reload.
You got it twisted, only one getting artificially nerfed is Russia.
4 Likes
He’s mainly refering russian CAS/SPAA missiles and certain rounds being of dubious existence (eg 9M317MA, KH-38MT, 3OU8, etc) which just happen to be the best in their class and very hard to get nerfed becuase the documentation simply doesn’t exist.
As for artificially nerfed NATO stuff, thats been in the game since modern tech was added, so not worth complaining about
1 Like
Sure every nation has some of that but if you want a comparison you need like 5 tech trees to match the preferential treatment russia gets in that regard ive already done a comparison of that earlier that no RU main had an answer to.
Prototypes and experimental vehicles are fine, pulling missiles out of thin air isnt.
Reloads are all over the place in general thats nothing that only affects russia negatively.
1 Like
Its not just in ground (looks at soyuz)
1 Like
I know the fake japanese tanks and the removed German ones, but which US tank is fake? All seem to at least have been built as prototypes.
This is coping into the other extreme lmao.
3 Likes
There’s probably a dozen vehicles from Japan/Germany that are of dubious existence.
1 Like
Your comment would have more gravitas if you included examples. Preferably some that are not 2016 additions in WW2 tier
1 Like
Why should year of introduction and tier matter ?
Dubious is dubious.