yeah you just proved that you dont know what you are talking about
how about you look at how long that burns for, because that is not burning anywhere near a quickly as you are suggesting given that it is still burning at the end of the video
because of that, the pressure is much lower than you would think, and the caps over the back of the rounds should give enough time for the blast doors to close
If you are that sure of yourself, with an open ammo rack you would be completely fine, you can test the theory yourself.
I refuse to continue debating with someone who never has a point.
If you want me to go search for your lies and made up non sense I will. It will prove more enjoyable then trying to have a conversation with you.
Edit: quite literally looked it up. Iraq uses M865 which is a solvent-less propellant just as with other nato ammo types. Takes slightly more to cause a reaction, but react it does.
Also, it is just as capable to start a big fire ball as is in that video, therefore, you believe too much in something to work that doesn’t do exactly what you think it does.
it has been confirmed and has happened multiple times
russian MOD even has stopped denying it, with their response to a claim of 6 shot down at once being that they didnt launch not that many missiles not that kinzhal wasnt shot down
Do we know which variant of M865? There are 3 different types of powder (4,600, 4,800 or 4,950 bar). If you’d excuse the assumptions entailed in the use of ideal gasses (“PV = NRT”) using the known values for, Breach volume & chamber pressure, and the Volume of the Bustle rack we could figure out what the low end could be.