it actually looks a lot like the picture of kinzhal you posted, at least when you consider that the front part is actually a windscreen to help with aerodynamics at lower speeds which you can see where it attaches on the shot down one
Which is not a steel cap and still quite wider than a what ever that has been shotdown.
No, I agree that I have much higher skill than you, and require less of a crutch of expert crews.
Which you failed to mention an ace crews gives advantages over any ace crew T series tank
 UniqueScorpions-live:or explosion
Sure, but what is going to explode; in the bustle rack? As I’ve established; neither the propellant nor Warhead of M456 or M830 are liable to sympathetically explode.
 UniqueScorpions-live:with an open / pierced ammo bulkhead
Again, the Bulkhead, and Ammo door is not the only measure in place to prevent a fire from immediately reaching the fighting compartment of the M1, it is going to primarily be vented in a safe (for the crew) direction. And IRL provide time for the crew to take subsequent steps to asses the situation and evacuate as required.
it would certainly “M-Kill”, a Tank (so would a round to the gun tube or Driving Sprocket for that matter) but I wouldn’t say that the Hull would always be a complete write-off or could not eventually be returned to service, with the damaged module(s) replaced.
Somehow I doubt a reaction would be this slow. But it in not guaranteed to not catch fire from the article you mentioned earlier.
you clearly dont know how ballistic missiles work
because the motor does not stay connected to the warhead in the terminal phase
Somehow I doubt a reaction would be this slow
You do get that in the provided video the Fuel (alcohol vapors) is mixed into the air, and is effectively a gas. And that it might have some influence on the rate of reaction.
It be closer to trying to set woodchips on fire.
Kinzhal missile that reaches hypersonic closer to the terminal stage ?
yes?
the main motor detaches once it burns out, there might be a smaller one but given the size of the final stage and warhead I doubt it
There might be or there is ? I don’t see any indication of a secondary engine and no any other sets of fins
I doubt that there is, or if there is it is not too significant
some ballistic missiles might but in this case probably not
and no any other sets of fins
again, its a ballistic missile
again, its a ballistic missile
Scarab B detaches it’s engine when its about to explode like seconds before it’s explodes
 UniqueScorpions-live:Somehow I doubt a reaction would be this slow
You do get that in the provided video the Fuel (alcohol vapors) is mixed into the air, and is effectively a gas. And that it might have some influence on the rate of reaction.
It be closer to trying to set woodchips on fire.
Yes, but the principal I’m getting at is the same.
Yes, but the principal I’m getting at is the same.
Sure, but its nowhere near as violent as you are implying.
Only way to find out is a test
and?
most ballistic missiles separate well before that point
Most of whos ? Kinzhal is a somewhat copy of Iskander which is descendant of Scarab B
Not really, there isn’t. Take the below video as an example of RDX based explosives (Comp. A & B are similar)
Beyond that, the propellants would have far too many variables (let alone the scenario itself) to genericize since the reaction rate can vary significantly.
what is the source for scarab B only separating that late? because that is very out of the norm in it retaining extra drag and making itself an easier to hit target when it doesnt need to
I mean not to go super off topic, but yes.