I was referring to the propellant. But I would still believe it could detonate. “To prevent” vs “Will prevent” they aren’t even sure of it themselves.
Have you ever fired a shotgun? Yes/no the answer doesn’t really matter. If you hold a shotgun at the hip, and I mean just hold it up, not brace for it. When you pull the trigger that shotgun will fly backwards out of your hands. As would a shell out of the rack if it is cooking off. The fire is going somewhere and the path of least resistance is where it will go.
E.G. flying at Mach Jesus into the crew compartment in a fiery blaze along with other shells likely.
Even with a tiny 15-28mm hole, that’s a lot of hot fire coming still coming into the crew compartment, and that’s not even considering that the blast door could be bent after piercing the bulk head in some angles y the projectile / shells causing damage.
It would be interesting to see a true test of this, but likely it wouldn’t likely never happen.
“Lost” is a polite way of saying destroyed. It’s merely a play on words to look better.
Even looking at abrams casualties against drone, I had seen an cookoff where the abrams turret actually had blown upwards lifting the whole rear of the turret upwards and forwards slightly. It wasn’t as bad as a Fully loaded T-72 mind you, but nobody survived.
That implies that the casing remains whole, and that the propellant would burn as it would when contained and fired properly in a gun tube. Which if it’s in the rack is not the case; its known that US ammo uses combustible cases(cellulose) for the wall of the majority of the cartridge(see below), and the lack of an igniter means that the burn would not be as consistent. So there would be a much reduced maximum pressure build up vs normal firing; as the unsupported cellulose would rupture and burn before sustaining excessive built up pressure .
Going back to the bullet analogy, an “out of battery” failure, ends up with a very different end state vs normal firing. which the casing often rupturing at a seam.
Could you show me where I said the USSR was bad? And another thing, what’s the problem with dying and respawning with a KH38 or Lmur?
They press W and kill everyone? Where is this happening, in which BR? Tell me, because I also want to play in this BR
Have you ever played as USSR?
Sure, but what is going to explode; in the bustle rack? As I’ve established; neither the propellant nor Warhead of M456 or M830 are liable to sympathetically explode.
Again, the Bulkhead, and Ammo door is not the only measure in place to prevent a fire from immediately reaching the fighting compartment of the M1, it is going to primarily be vented in a safe (for the crew) direction. And IRL provide time for the crew to take subsequent steps to asses the situation and evacuate as required.
it would certainly “M-Kill”, a Tank (so would a round to the gun tube or Driving Sprocket for that matter) but I wouldn’t say that the Hull would always be a complete write-off or could not eventually be returned to service, with the damaged module(s) replaced.
Omnidirectional means all directions. There’s no such thing as 8 out of the 4 directions? Do you have any idea what you are talking about?
Do you have any actual arguments? Your previous argument said that the BVM’s shell isn’t good because sometimes when you shoot “it screws you”. You should spend your time giving real arguments instead of posting fake stats my guy. Our K/D ratio is 0.05 apart from each other in ground, almost identical.
No, all thermals are not modelled the same in game.
So you agree with me that your argument of all tanks in a lineup being upgraded is ridiculous? Are you here to discuss a veichle or argue against yourself?
it actually looks a lot like the picture of kinzhal you posted, at least when you consider that the front part is actually a windscreen to help with aerodynamics at lower speeds which you can see where it attaches on the shot down one
You do get that in the provided video the Fuel (alcohol vapors) is mixed into the air, and is effectively a gas. And that it might have some influence on the rate of reaction.
