Scarab B detaches it’s engine when its about to explode like seconds before it’s explodes
Yes, but the principal I’m getting at is the same.
Sure, but its nowhere near as violent as you are implying.
Only way to find out is a test
and?
most ballistic missiles separate well before that point
Most of whos ? Kinzhal is a somewhat copy of Iskander which is descendant of Scarab B
Not really, there isn’t. Take the below video as an example of RDX based explosives (Comp. A & B are similar)
Beyond that, the propellants would have far too many variables (let alone the scenario itself) to genericize since the reaction rate can vary significantly.
what is the source for scarab B only separating that late? because that is very out of the norm in it retaining extra drag and making itself an easier to hit target when it doesnt need to
I mean not to go super off topic, but yes.
you are not at all
yeah you just proved that you dont know what you are talking about
how about you look at how long that burns for, because that is not burning anywhere near a quickly as you are suggesting given that it is still burning at the end of the video
because of that, the pressure is much lower than you would think, and the caps over the back of the rounds should give enough time for the blast doors to close
It’s engine always falls down in a 100-300 meter radius from where warhead landed there has been several footages this is from Kramatorsk.
2 Likes
yes?
that doesnt really prove it separated just before impact
because once it separates the engine will still be traveling on the same ballistic arc
If you are that sure of yourself, with an open ammo rack you would be completely fine, you can test the theory yourself.
I refuse to continue debating with someone who never has a point.
If you want me to go search for your lies and made up non sense I will. It will prove more enjoyable then trying to have a conversation with you.
Edit: quite literally looked it up. Iraq uses M865 which is a solvent-less propellant just as with other nato ammo types. Takes slightly more to cause a reaction, but react it does.
Also, it is just as capable to start a big fire ball as is in that video, therefore, you believe too much in something to work that doesn’t do exactly what you think it does.
Holy cope.
5 Likes
With aerodymanics of an empty barrel ?
that part actually has control surfaces and fins, even if they arent actively guiding it it might be enough to keep it mostly on course often enough
or it might be kept close to the warhead due to low pressure following it
or a combination of those and other factors
also even if the booster was still attached when the kinzhals were intercepted, the force of getting hit by the interceptor might have broken it off
Yeah hes like a few other in here. Having a mass skill issue to hitting the “off button” on an enemy tank.
Nah yk, best heli in the world… that LACKS RWR LMAO.
And SPAA that cant be used against slow targets… and small targets too
Good luck doing that without autopilot or guidance system.
So we just going to exclude force used to detach engine ?
Or it’s detaches engine right before it’s going to hit target.
Too bad that what ever they shotdown doesn’t look like Kinzhal
3 Likes
it has been confirmed and has happened multiple times
russian MOD even has stopped denying it, with their response to a claim of 6 shot down at once being that they didnt launch not that many missiles not that kinzhal wasnt shot down