Leo 2A7/Strv 122
Abrams
Merkava Mk.4
Leclerc
Leo 2A5/6/PSO
CR2E
Type 10/TKX
T-80BVM
Ariete AMV
CR2BN
ZTZ99A/WZ1001
T-90M
VT4A1
T-72B3A
There is my list. Interchangeable depending on playstyle below the Top 3. For example, i’d play the AMV over the BVM.
6 Likes
So DM53 is unplayable because it’s worse than M829A2?
Motorola said L27 was bad.
1 Like
The fact that almost none of these are pros or correct makes you sound like either a schizophrenic or someone who hasn’t even checked the damn statcard.
11 Likes
I shot a ZTZ96 and my shell didn’t spall, when I shot side on.
I shot a Strv 121 through the side of the turret, and my shell just dissapeared.
It happens to everyone.
4 Likes
I just HAVE to chip in and say skill issue. The weak spots on any T-tank are probably the most obvious places to shoot. 8/10 times I get shot in my UFP, I get insta-killed; otherwise, I get outright crippled. You can shoot our drivers viewport for an easy one-tap, the breech/turret face for a cripple or kill, and even knock out a crew member and our autoloader by shooting the bump on the top of the turret.
NATO tanks reign supreme in MOST maps due to their mobility, at least in BR’s without T80’s.
1 Like
Im not even very good and Im literally farming T series in OES and Click Bait lol. It is way easier to farm idiot who hold their W key if you actually bother to learn the map and work around the tank weak side. Instead of hoping for your center mass shot will lol pen the enemy.
Not to mention the superior gun handling and reload speed can pick off multiple tank. Just get good lol
1 Like
i don’t think that ither are more or less trust worthy it’s just how they show the data
BR heatmap shows BR ranges but stat shark only shows the single BR at the time
i personally like BR heatmap more because of this deference because that is how the matches work ingame
the main difference this makes is that it includes cas in the Calculations (nvm this is kind of wrong it includes the matches that have top tier cas and separates this from the down tiers that don’t)
If USSR is sooooo bad, why are they just press W and killing everybody? When you killing them, 38MT/LMUR magic start’s. If USSR is sooooo bad, then why is so many USSR in random?
Statshark gathers much more data and is inherently more trustworthy.
2 Likes
oh ok that is cool to know.
where can i see this more data?
You can google Statshark.
The combo Ka-52 - Pantsir is back bois, whoooooooooooo!
Ah yes 2 mid systems but in game best in the world.
Game is a pure Russian cope fantasy
1 Like
Your comment is cope bruh, what about them is ‘mid’?
1 Like
What about them is good?
Using a beam riding missile when the Ah-64 has been using Radar guided Hellfires for years!
Pantsir…a system that has been proven to not excel at anything, shooting down drones…sometimes, cruise missiles again very average.
So yes they are 2 mid systems that have inflated stats and performance in game because, well this game is a Russian cope simulator :)
1 Like
And this is a NAFO cope forum, seems fair.
4 Likes
Back as in usable, yeah.
Ka-52 and AH-1Z were sub-par when the new SPAA shared their BR, and F&F helicopters were at most only 0.3 above them.
Of course if you compare Russian/Soviet equipment in War Thunder to NATO equipment, or even Chinese, it falls behind from marginal to substantial.
1 Like
No not really just Russian Bias used to be a meme, but now it’s just there and it coincides neatly with how poorly Russian stuff is performing in the real world.
But no if you think systems that are actually failing in real world scenarios is NAFO cope then go ahead :)
Do you happen to lurk on subreddits such as R/Ukraine and r/worldnews by anychance?
5 Likes