It definitely is, especially with that reload speed.
It is, it’s only better than the Oplot and Challengers.
It’s around on par with the Leclercs and Chinese MBTs.
It’s worse than the Abrams tanks, Type 10s, Leopard 2A5+ tanks and Merkavas.
Last time I checked that is pretty mid.
Nope, just because you struggle against them doesn’t suddenly make them super good vehicles.
Where do you get this idea from that it’s because ‘I struggle’ against them? What does that even mean? That after god knows how many games I keep shooting the same spots like forcing a square shape through a circle hole? This is just another strawman to distract from the fact those tanks overperform.
Because you keep massively overrating them.
Most good players know they can farm most T-series tanks.
I don’t think they are.
No wonder.
![]()
570mm and 580mm are pretty close.
T-tanks still have really mediocre firepower.
I had no issues destroying their tanks.
Source: none
The complete reluctance to simply say yes tells me all I need to know. Enjoy man, go farm some T-series and show me the montage.
Nah, I’m trying to understand the nightmare that is your mind by you saying T-series have bad pen but in the same breath refusing to apply your own logic to the L27 which has worse pen even if marginal. The refusal to apply logic equally shows a bias intentional or not.
I mean whatever source people would bring you would disagree because it doesn’t align with your headcannon.
There is a reason why you see almost no Russia in the tournaments (good players), or that almost every time you see a decent-good player rank the top tier MBTs the BVM is always barely between place 9-15.
And I’m counting actually good players here. I definitely don’t count you and I wouldn’t even count myself among those players.
I’m just exposing your own words and how they don’t align with any logic.
T-series have mediocre at best firepower.
Same as Challengers.
Nope, I absorb the facts, but I accept that in this game there are variables that alter those facts.
Professional play is completely parallel to casual play and this is the same with any game. You cannot apply the same set of rules.
The disadvantages that make these pro players not pick Russia is the same reason they are mid in normal RB, but like I said:
None of your headcannons about why the T-series are super strong are based on facts to begin with lmao.
Wildest part is someone thinking 7.1s reload is GOOD in top tier :D :D :D :D :D
While it is slowest reload in top tier.
T90 mobility is meh compared to bvm .
Because I have tried virtually every top tier MBT in the game, excluding the Chinese ones :)
Leo 2A7/Strv 122
Abrams
Merkava Mk.4
Leclerc
Leo 2A5/6/PSO
CR2E
Type 10/TKX
T-80BVM
Ariete AMV
CR2BN
ZTZ99A/WZ1001
T-90M
VT4A1
T-72B3A
There is my list. Interchangeable depending on playstyle below the Top 3. For example, i’d play the AMV over the BVM.
So DM53 is unplayable because it’s worse than M829A2?
Motorola said L27 was bad.
The fact that almost none of these are pros or correct makes you sound like either a schizophrenic or someone who hasn’t even checked the damn statcard.
I shot a ZTZ96 and my shell didn’t spall, when I shot side on.
I shot a Strv 121 through the side of the turret, and my shell just dissapeared.
It happens to everyone.
I just HAVE to chip in and say skill issue. The weak spots on any T-tank are probably the most obvious places to shoot. 8/10 times I get shot in my UFP, I get insta-killed; otherwise, I get outright crippled. You can shoot our drivers viewport for an easy one-tap, the breech/turret face for a cripple or kill, and even knock out a crew member and our autoloader by shooting the bump on the top of the turret.
NATO tanks reign supreme in MOST maps due to their mobility, at least in BR’s without T80’s.
