I am not going to discuss this topic again, since i got sent to gulag for it recently.
I am just going to say you are totaly brainwashed.
5 Likes
Nah all of the Western world is only closly monitoring russia bc they arent any thread at all
1 Like
What makes Russia a threat?
What possible capability excluding their nuclear arsenal makes them a threat?
Do you expect Russia to wipe the floor with NATO and the USA?
And if so what has lead you to that conclusion?
3 Likes
Calm down Propagandalf, not good for the health getting so riled up.
2 Likes
War Thunder: T-series tanks explode in the thousands.
IRL: Most of the time electronics fail/crews panic from hits, or equipment malfunctions, rather than ammo being hit.
War Thunder: Mig-29’s RD-33 engines have an under-represented thrust curve causing incorrectly low acceleration between 0 & ~700kph in indicated air speed.
IRL: Mig-29 is one of the best multi-role interceptors for the cost.
War Thunder: Pantsir cannot intercept aircraft performing CAS duties due to how easy it is to control CAS aircraft outside of Pantsir’s effective range.
IRL: Pantsir performs decently against aircraft using older air to ground weapons due to said weapons being harder to use IRL than in-game.
War Thunder: War Thunder players know how to play the game and get into strong positions, using the game mechanics of audio, 3rd person view, and aim down barrel mechanics.
IRL: Tanks are inherently harder to use, and while tankers are well trained, they cannot ever achieve performance similar to that of video games.
2 Likes
? you mean the missile that has been intercepted by patriot multiple times?
3 Likes
seems to go well recently dosent it?
2 Likes
its still been intercepted
and patriot isnt even the best US system against that kind of missile,
idk why people keep hyping up an air launched ballistic missile so much because that is all that it is
Do you expect NATO and the USA to do so?
1 Like
What missle is this supposed to be?
Buddy the range is so short and Ukraine have intercepted it with PAC 3 Patriot system. It is also air launched from a MiG 31
It’s a good missile but not one to put NATO on edge.
100% First think NATO do is destroy Russian Satellites and then cripple every part of command and control.
Yes NATO will lose aircraft it’s inevitable, but they are so much more advanced than Russia it would not be a massive ask.
Remember Russia are failing to shoot down drones, drones have a massive RCS compared to an F-35
Thats Kinzhal hypersonic air launched missile
The missile allegedly destroyed, or the one on the plane?
What range do you think it has?
1 Like
you know how stupid that is?
lets put alot of debry in close earth orbit that is on uncontrolled trajetories and will more likely than not damage or destroy friendly assets which could lead to a chain reaction that could take out most of the satilites around earth
2 Likes
The missile was shot down by a PAC 3 Patriot interceptor, not the PAC 2 designed for aircraft
The MiG 31 was unharmed
Russia can do the same with the S-500?
Hilarious point. Not even trying to hide your bias.
Did you just IGNORE my entire point about Ukraine’s drone raid on moscow failing???
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/new/
I insist you look on here for drone interceptions by both Ukraine and Russia…
1 Like
Realistically and nukes aside, i’d bet on NATO more than Russia
No our days the US rival is China, Russia i just a pale remain of what it once was (especially if we take into account the fact that some SSRs are now against russia)