Im not even very good and Im literally farming T series in OES and Click Bait lol. It is way easier to farm idiot who hold their W key if you actually bother to learn the map and work around the tank weak side. Instead of hoping for your center mass shot will lol pen the enemy.
Not to mention the superior gun handling and reload speed can pick off multiple tank. Just get good lol
i don’t think that ither are more or less trust worthy it’s just how they show the data
BR heatmap shows BR ranges but stat shark only shows the single BR at the time
i personally like BR heatmap more because of this deference because that is how the matches work ingame
the main difference this makes is that it includes cas in the Calculations (nvm this is kind of wrong it includes the matches that have top tier cas and separates this from the down tiers that don’t)
If USSR is sooooo bad, why are they just press W and killing everybody? When you killing them, 38MT/LMUR magic start’s. If USSR is sooooo bad, then why is so many USSR in random?
Statshark gathers much more data and is inherently more trustworthy.
oh ok that is cool to know.
where can i see this more data?
You can google Statshark.
The combo Ka-52 - Pantsir is back bois, whoooooooooooo!
Ah yes 2 mid systems but in game best in the world.
Game is a pure Russian cope fantasy
Your comment is cope bruh, what about them is ‘mid’?
What about them is good?
Using a beam riding missile when the Ah-64 has been using Radar guided Hellfires for years!
Pantsir…a system that has been proven to not excel at anything, shooting down drones…sometimes, cruise missiles again very average.
So yes they are 2 mid systems that have inflated stats and performance in game because, well this game is a Russian cope simulator :)
And this is a NAFO cope forum, seems fair.
Back as in usable, yeah.
Ka-52 and AH-1Z were sub-par when the new SPAA shared their BR, and F&F helicopters were at most only 0.3 above them.
Of course if you compare Russian/Soviet equipment in War Thunder to NATO equipment, or even Chinese, it falls behind from marginal to substantial.
No not really just Russian Bias used to be a meme, but now it’s just there and it coincides neatly with how poorly Russian stuff is performing in the real world.
But no if you think systems that are actually failing in real world scenarios is NAFO cope then go ahead :)
Do you happen to lurk on subreddits such as R/Ukraine and r/worldnews by anychance?
I am not going to discuss this topic again, since i got sent to gulag for it recently.
I am just going to say you are totaly brainwashed.
Nah all of the Western world is only closly monitoring russia bc they arent any thread at all
What makes Russia a threat?
What possible capability excluding their nuclear arsenal makes them a threat?
Do you expect Russia to wipe the floor with NATO and the USA?
And if so what has lead you to that conclusion?
Calm down Propagandalf, not good for the health getting so riled up.
War Thunder: T-series tanks explode in the thousands.
IRL: Most of the time electronics fail/crews panic from hits, or equipment malfunctions, rather than ammo being hit.
War Thunder: Mig-29’s RD-33 engines have an under-represented thrust curve causing incorrectly low acceleration between 0 & ~700kph in indicated air speed.
IRL: Mig-29 is one of the best multi-role interceptors for the cost.
War Thunder: Pantsir cannot intercept aircraft performing CAS duties due to how easy it is to control CAS aircraft outside of Pantsir’s effective range.
IRL: Pantsir performs decently against aircraft using older air to ground weapons due to said weapons being harder to use IRL than in-game.
War Thunder: War Thunder players know how to play the game and get into strong positions, using the game mechanics of audio, 3rd person view, and aim down barrel mechanics.
IRL: Tanks are inherently harder to use, and while tankers are well trained, they cannot ever achieve performance similar to that of video games.
