So am I beginning to question yours as you can’t understand simplest of things.
This is a perfect example of a rule Gaijin has for all nations in the game.
1 Like
Good anecdote mate, unfortunately CR2’s are the worst top-tier MBT’s except for possibly the Ariete and it’s straight fact. The CR2’s offer no advantages over other MBT’s despite being far heavier. Black Knight is decent because of the APS and that’s about it.
I would even argue Ariete is better because at least your tank isn’t pretending to be something it’s not - i.e heavy and armoured, and also has access to DM53.
Yeah, because people don’t change their mind simply over ‘you’re wrong, I’m so good at the game and everything I say is gospel. T-XX sucks!!! If you disagree then you’re just bad’
I’ll say this one last time.
There clearly is an imbalance at top tier because at the same BR some vehicles perform much better than others. You call it a compression issue, but as long as a so-called top tier exists there will always be the same problem, namely some vehicles facing much stronger ones at the same BR.
If you call that compression, then clearly top tier compression is the same as imbalance because no amount of decompression can fix it.
Or you could argue compression and imbalance are separate issues, but then it’s more of an imbalance than compression problem.
Either way, you brought up compression to disprove the existence of imbalance at top tier. I have taken all perspectives to show you it doesn’t. And all communication has become futile.
I do think you’re just trying to keep the conversation going. That’s fine, people want to talk to people all the time, and I have humoured you with some very simple arguments in a manner you could understand. You have appear agitated throughout this conversation, so I suppose my participation has not made you feel any better. I shan’t reply from this point onwards.
If anyone were to be convinced there indeed is imbalance at top tier, they’ll do so without engaging in this tedious theatre of semantics. I personally rarely debate with people for the sake of debating, but sometimes this is good mental exercise, so thanks for that.
2 Likes
Happens when a tier gets compressed.
It simply isn’t.
I’m sorry that you can’t understand some things about the game, but that happens with not so good players, which is unfortunate for you and even me that’s trying to explain basic things to you.
1 Like
Amazing, just hit a T-72B3 centre-mass from the side for absolutely zero spalling and a commander kill only for him to snap back and one-shot my CR2E with spall liners and massive internal space. T-Series really sucks.
You know, the most cramped line of MBT’s with absolutely no crew ergonomics and only three members routinely surviving shots that would take out other MBT’s with much more interior space and higher crew count?
1 Like
When you say the T-90M has a good reload, good speed and a good round there really isn’t much else to say.
Everyone reasonable knows that the T-90M is mediocre or at best mid in all these categories. Your whole line of reasoning seems to be that the T-90M is good because you struggle against them, so you just make stuff up to push that agenda.
2 Likes
The thing is I never specifically mentioned the T-90M. I said the T-series, of which the vast majority of T-80’s. The fact you’re strawmanning about the T-90 speaks for itself. The T-90M is also not bad, it’s just not as good as the T-80’s, which for some reason you think are bad, ergo you think the T90 is terrible - it’s not. I rarely see T-90’s in comparison to 80’s.
No one said T-series tanks sucks, they just aren’t as strong as you think.
You or Renzo said they are bad.
E: forgive me, it was Magik. But you’re all singing from the same hymn sheet.
1 Like
Which also are at best mid in terms of firepower.
It’s mediocre, I can’t of a single tank I wouldn’t rather play over it except for the T-72B3A.
Never said they are bad, they are just at most slightly above middle of the pack.
2 Likes
I’m sorry that I don’t align with people that think T-series tanks are some crazy good vehicles that ruin whole tiers. You have uparmored Leopards for that.
3 Likes
580m pen is not mid.
Which is false.
It definitely is, especially with that reload speed.
1 Like
Who said they ruin the whole tier? They are braindead strong and form arguably one of if not the best ground+air lineup in the game, but I’m not going to deny it’s insanely unfun to watch magic Russian black hole ERA tech save brainless morons not taking their finger off the W key all game.
It is, it’s only better than the Oplot and Challengers.
It’s around on par with the Leclercs and Chinese MBTs.
It’s worse than the Abrams tanks, Type 10s, Leopard 2A5+ tanks and Merkavas.
Last time I checked that is pretty mid.
Nope, just because you struggle against them doesn’t suddenly make them super good vehicles.
4 Likes
So you will agree that the CR2’s are absolute dogshit with their 397mm pen stock round and 570 best penning round?
Where do you get this idea from that it’s because ‘I struggle’ against them? What does that even mean? That after god knows how many games I keep shooting the same spots like forcing a square shape through a circle hole? This is just another strawman to distract from the fact those tanks overperform.
Because you keep massively overrating them.
Most good players know they can farm most T-series tanks.
3 Likes
I don’t think they are.
No wonder.
570mm and 580mm are pretty close.
T-tanks still have really mediocre firepower.
I had no issues destroying their tanks.
3 Likes