The HAC carries TRIGAT, not Spikes. The reason people are complaining about it is that it’s identical to the UHT, but with the option of carrying MISTRAL.
Gaijin simply forgor, but to the top mind of our usual suspects it’s just proof of the shadow rule of the french playerbase.
Imo all the helis that don’t have LDIRCM should be allowed at a lower BR than the ones that do. Sure a 16 Spike loadout is better than 8 PARS, but having F&F helis lower than top AAs would be a mistake.
US mains can be good in air.
Russian mains are definitely the best of the “big three” I’ve never seen better team mates, I’ve had plenty while I’ve played sub nations that will stop advancing, drive to me and help me repair, or if I’m advancing, they’ll covered the flank decently.
Vs a US team is gone in the first 3 mins of a game, all the flanks are left open, nobody is watching a sector, it feels like the USA players are the new Germans. Playing the T58 a lot as of late has proven this to me.
They are all trash lmao. Yeah they aren’t 1 death leavers but player quality wise they are about the same.
The T-series are also just very forgiving to play, which would explain why russian mains survive longer (not that they are any useful in that extra time besides to act as cannon fodder later).
R-27ER wasn’t all that prolific.
You could fly low and avoid it.
And its counters all had Aim-9ms, and smaller airframes.
Meanwhile things like the Mig-29smt, yak-141, and Su-27 all had pretty big flaws all in their own area.
They are one death leavers in my experience, especially around 9.0
At top tier it’s actually a slaughter, they all want to jump in their CAS asap and rush brainlessly.
Especially BMD-4s It’s either nuke or 1 DL
If you say so, I disagree, im not going to say they all are good, but ratio wise they are far higher than the others
Secondly… T series forgiving how? They all are one tapped pretty easily. They’re only forgiving if the enemy you face can’t aim or isn’t very intelligent.
Thus is why the American mains, while driving my T-72B3 continued to shoot my upper plate only yet the German, Italian, Brit’s, japs, and so on, actually would target weak areas.
I’m talking about people playing SEPV2 as well.
Read again chief (still only 24mm away from best pen, basically negligible, especially compared to the 380 gang that isn’t Italy)
Ok i’ll do some factorisation, like in maths : The best firepower, with the best (pen + filler combination). Better ?
Its armor is +10mm to -35mm compared to Yamato, except you can angle it. It’s a monster of armor, no doubt on this
I haven’t playing 9.7 in a hot minute, but at top tier and 8.7 down, it’s all “I NEED KILLS GIVE ME THE KILLS” and they’ll use you as bait and never take a cap.
My wr in the T58 being at 78% is because I was making up 1/3 of the team.
T58 is either busted or AMX-13s victim, but why are you bringing it up all of a sudden ?
I mean hey, I too preferred that add missile carriers so I could sink you miles outside of your firing range, but gaijin insisted on balanced and dropped a SovetSky in my lap
It’s an example…? You know what an example is right?
Russia isn’t the only nation to have missile ships ? But sure i can’t wait for them either
Yes but how is it relevent to the discussion at hand ? There’s a T58 thread i think
Just going to leave these here, It’s an option by the way.
“Soldiers engage an unmanned aerial system (UAS) from an AH-64 with upgraded Hellfire missile”
“The Army is continuing to develop software enhancements to improve height-of-burst lethality”
Which is like a large majority of the playerbase of 11.0-12.7 at the moment, hence why they are forgiving.
Armor is the noob’s best friend against other noobs. If 2 equally unskilled players face eachotherin a T-80UE-1 vs Click Bait the player in the T-80UE-1 will likely win.
Click bait would likely win…? More pen, faster reload, better mobility etc.
Or if you have to do a splitsecond shot in a weakspot while T-Series can just shoot centermass?
I don’t suffer from that problem. I’m very good at aiming.
Good for you but we can agree that one is objectively harder than the other?.
