Pffffff yeah right all over the forum so unhappy about that
So stating thruths is now coping, good to know.
Uh yeah? There’s multiple threads that either complain about air rb overall with emphasis on the rafale or compare it to its competitors etc
2 Likes
Yes there are, and i specified it’s not unjustified, so i don’t get where the “unhappy” part comes from
Unlike some people here i don’t have issues admitting something is unbalanced, even if it is a vehicle i like and it is in my most played nation
Plenty others, but you get the point. When a vehicle is problematic in game, it’s heavily discussed. T58, Turm III, Most of Russia’s CAS, Soyuz, Rafale. None escape that simple rule
1 Like
Plenty of what ? 1500 replies since April 5th and 700 replies since September 6th this is something that close to “We don’t care” it’s not even close to weekly Russian Bias topic with 1000 replies per week and level of anger that not even close to what happening in those Rafale topics.
2 Likes
Almost as if the most played mode was Ground RB where Rafale is less problematic and being a vehicle of a “minor” tree, it’s less seen by people in general. Besides, it’s one vehicle, not an entire line up being busted
People complain proportionally do the amount of pain they receive in the face, it’s human behavior 101
There is less Rafale seen = they complain less. Does it make Rafale less busted ? Certainly not, but the fact that there is less complaints can easily be explained by this single fact
I think R-27ER had more replies than Rafale
A comparison can not be made, R27ER was problematic for years, Rafale has yet to be in game for 1 year.
I don’t play Air RB much these days, but i also think R27ER was far more prolific than Rafale is right now.
Edit : just checked out
R27ER is horror thread, January 2024 to now, 250 replies, 700 for “Rafale’s reign at top tier” on September and October alone
Rafale’s main thread :
Is already on part 2 as well. Might want to take a wild guess as to why that is ?
Excuse me Ralafe is both best carrier with one the best missiles Su-27 at top was hot trash compared all others with best missile.
I think Su-27/30 main thread have more replies Russian Bias have more replies stop pretending that people care about it’s being the best.
1 Like
Lmao bro on what basis. IRL one got shot out of the sky like it was nothing, confirmed and undeniable. Nato propaganda when it actually meets a good competitor and wouldnt even last a fight against a 5th gen of any kind. Cope is insane
Yes and IRL russian tanks transform into space program when hit, in game chance are the ERA eats the round, or the caroussel. Meanwhile it would seem western tanks (Leopards, Abrams and chally) enable the crew to go out after they are hit
As for Rafale it wasn’t carrying long range AAMs, only short range MICAs and cruise missiles (some bases were bombed in Pak and no Rafale were lost in the following day, with India trying to purchase more, but that part is strangely forgotten most of the time, go figure
Nato 4.5th Gen jets are dogshit, nothing but hyped overrated dogwater jets. Irl Eurofighter jets have lost to pakistani J10CEs in WVR and BVR exercises. But watch them now pin the blame on Qatari Eft pilots being bad or corruption, any excuse to bring back more cope
Their airforce was grounded for 3 days lol. Ofc who is going shoot down something when there is nothing to shoot at in the air. Go figure
One can wonder what was hitting these pak bases then ^^’
And neither of their jets could pick up the missile in the first place, Seems like rafailure’s systems are just overhyped
Damn those flying leopards!!!
I know reading comprehension is hard but you could make a bit of an effort at least
1 Like
AESA radar fitted missile may be able to do that, although it was never confirmed
Chinese stuff seems to behave far better than russian one on a real battlefield though, from the small amount we’ve seen so far.
As for “french planes bad” “Rafailure” well it seems someone is struggling to keep up with the AASMs beeing dropped on a weekly basis by F16, Mig29s or Mirage 2000s so yeah… Not a good look ngl
Still no signs of the wunderwaffe KH38s though, only some glide bombs
Implying the other without much proof was some what hampered. whilst also using the word “are”, doesnt help your case. Think you need help with writing composition lol. Think before you try to sneak an insult that you do yourself not any favors of making yourself look bad
although I never argued about Russian things being so much better, when already an F16 beautifully has been shot down by an S400. Or vice versa Patriot system shooting down su35s or anything for that matter. here is an enjoyable photo of the KH38. Now its not my issue you cant see the wonderwaffe with much proof.
Love this photo, of the kh38. Just absolutely a rage baiting photo that cant get more better than this
1 Like
My reading comprehensions is completely fine, thanks for asking. The sentence was correct, it could have been more clear but i thought the “in the case of the 2A7” would be enough to understand that i mean the 2A7. Sorry for that unclearness, ill change my wording according to the audience.
Not an SU30SM, not a KH38MT. Not sure what youre trying to bait but its not rage i can tell you that.
1 Like