Excuse me Ralafe is both best carrier with one the best missiles Su-27 at top was hot trash compared all others with best missile.
I think Su-27/30 main thread have more replies Russian Bias have more replies stop pretending that people care about it’s being the best.
1 Like
Lmao bro on what basis. IRL one got shot out of the sky like it was nothing, confirmed and undeniable. Nato propaganda when it actually meets a good competitor and wouldnt even last a fight against a 5th gen of any kind. Cope is insane
Yes and IRL russian tanks transform into space program when hit, in game chance are the ERA eats the round, or the caroussel. Meanwhile it would seem western tanks (Leopards, Abrams and chally) enable the crew to go out after they are hit
As for Rafale it wasn’t carrying long range AAMs, only short range MICAs and cruise missiles (some bases were bombed in Pak and no Rafale were lost in the following day, with India trying to purchase more, but that part is strangely forgotten most of the time, go figure
Their airforce was grounded for 3 days lol. Ofc who is going shoot down something when there is nothing to shoot at in the air. Go figure
One can wonder what was hitting these pak bases then ^^’
And neither of their jets could pick up the missile in the first place, Seems like rafailure’s systems are just overhyped
Damn those flying leopards!!!
I know reading comprehension is hard but you could make a bit of an effort at least
1 Like
AESA radar fitted missile may be able to do that, although it was never confirmed
Chinese stuff seems to behave far better than russian one on a real battlefield though, from the small amount we’ve seen so far.
As for “french planes bad” “Rafailure” well it seems someone is struggling to keep up with the AASMs beeing dropped on a weekly basis by F16, Mig29s or Mirage 2000s so yeah… Not a good look ngl
Still no signs of the wunderwaffe KH38s though, only some glide bombs
Implying the other without much proof was some what hampered. whilst also using the word “are”, doesnt help your case. Think you need help with writing composition lol. Think before you try to sneak an insult that you do yourself not any favors of making yourself look bad
although I never argued about Russian things being so much better, when already an F16 beautifully has been shot down by an S400. Or vice versa Patriot system shooting down su35s or anything for that matter. here is an enjoyable photo of the KH38. Now its not my issue you cant see the wonderwaffe with much proof.
Love this photo, of the kh38. Just absolutely a rage baiting photo that cant get more better than this
1 Like
My reading comprehensions is completely fine, thanks for asking. The sentence was correct, it could have been more clear but i thought the “in the case of the 2A7” would be enough to understand that i mean the 2A7. Sorry for that unclearness, ill change my wording according to the audience.
Not an SU30SM, not a KH38MT. Not sure what youre trying to bait but its not rage i can tell you that.
1 Like
This Is wrong btw
2 Likes
Not really
Photos are a thing, results are an other. Today there is no results (thankfully might i add)
It is a poor attempt at ragebait (besides i’m pretty sure that’s a ML, not a MT)
What a reverse rage bait, when the guys posted that kh38 firing onto said objects and the moderators deleted it because of war footage. So deal with it, go ask those mods to help you out w it
1 Like
Because he clearly meant the MT (because a laser guided KH38 is not really a wonder in the 21st century) , you seem to struggle with context my dude.
Not really, they said that it might exist however nothing if it was ever tested and/or flown on a plane we have in game
Oh we can, the seeker doesnt work irl like it does in game, because Gaijin cant be bothered to properly model it but at least the seeker exists and was tested and fired and so on.
2 Likes
So true Lawrenczio
1 Like
again, vague context is his issue and yours, you clearly lack so called “reading comprehension” which you give others shit for, when he just mentioned Kh38s, again not my issue.
All the forum mods could have objected to it, whilst one moderator even said “its proven it has an IR seeker what more do you want”
again, if the mods so disagreed with it, why not take it up with the devs, they can make further more internal reports and clarification which they never did.
Heck even smin never has been asked to shown proof. Any of the CM and Mods can go ask the devs for clarification of the IR seeker which u so much look for. Ask them to ask the devs to deliver their source. Smins did that with when the su30sm double pylon proof was asked, and he said it came from the devs
1 Like
Even as a russian Main, i objected to that su30sm Double pylon photo which was nothing but a fov mishap or misunderstanding that allowed it to look like a double pylon. And when we asked smins that the photo isnt correct. he said it came from the devs.
You guys have the luxury of pressuring the devs. Do it. Like we did for the 30sm double pylon