I mean you could ask yourself a question, WHY are all these good players grinding the new Abrams?
If the T-series are equal to or better than the abrams as you have implied in the past, why are these good players grinding these worse Abrams instead of the supposedly much better T-90M arena?
Gee I truely wonder what the answer is to this mystery.
This is who I picture you to be after that comment:
I can indeed picture that world quite easily, as that’s the one we’re living in.
You’re just making the mistake of taking a poor (too high) camera angle when using the Armor Analysis Tool.
Instead, follow this guide to get accurate results:
Then there’s a chance you’re firing upwards into a MBT as well? Only making the UFP even less likely to be penetrated?
Head-on is by far the most common type of engagement, your screenshot showing the penetrable areas is false/flawed because of the reasons shown in the pic I provided.
New Abrams and its round dominating (1.66 kills per spawn vs 1.02 and 1.16)
MI28NM LMUR broken (and nerfed warhead)
KH38T not meta and the plane is very bad
.
.
.
Yet Russia is biased
I’m an incredibly mediocre CAS player, I lowkey suck at it, but when I tried the SM2 in GRB for the first time earlier this week it was borderline easymode.