Oh well not surpirsing that only argument for exictance of “Russian Bias” is lie.
“only argument” (clueless)
Also you’re yet to provide any substantial evidence to suggest it’s false.
1 Like
Literally showed 2A42 firing and you took screenshot of lights on the ground and started comparing it to fire pattern of the gun in the game.
I took a screenshot of your screenshot which you provided of the tracers in the air. Either those are tracers or you took a deliberately misleading screenshot to try to bait an incorrect response.
Hmmm let’s see my screenshot.
Spoiler
And yours.
Spoiler
Suspisiously looks like lights on the ground.
Yeah yeah what ever you just lost all credibility
Your lack of understanding of your own source is not my issue. I have demonstrated I did not make the error you claimed I did.
3 Likes
in the same tankograd page i posted it stated the gun high firerate mode was known for having issues with oval shaped recoil pattern, so it alligns pretty well
1 Like
Yes. Poor early soviet vertical stabilisation leads to the gun having notably worse vertical than horizontal dispersion. This is noted in quite a few places actually.
1 Like
You took screenshot of lights and pretender that its a firing pattern.
Which lacks time code from video and not even looks same.
Whatever you want to believe. Time code this time code that it’s the damn timestamp (that’s the correct word, although I can already tell russian is your native language) you provided.
Wait are taking shells that ricocheted from ground as standart of accuracy ?
No, those are before impact.
They literally ricocheted from ground and took pattern that you showed
Those are still before impact. The fact you can’t tell the difference is telling of its accuracy or lack thereof.
3 Likes
Literally tooks screenshot after 2 shells ricocheted from ground.
How many times do I have to reiterate. The screenshot is before impact. The fact you cannot tell that is telling of its lack of accuracy.