Like I said, if people complain about the Kh38/LDIRCM/Su-30SM2/BMPT/SV-SM I won’t statshark them and overlook their point. Those are perfectly justified things to complain about.
However if someone complains about Russian MBTs being too strong or too difficult to deal with I will absolutely statshark them to get info. Russian top tier MBT complaints have been the same for years, and they almost always have the same pattern: the person complaining is usually either mid or bad at the game.
OK, mid & bad with passive playstyle - I assume good player should be overconfident holding W if it doesn’t workout spawn CAS/Heli and spam missiles/bomb?
Otherwise, you really love the current META gave by GJN and defend it by say others don’t follow the META hard enough like you?
Yeah people follow the META, by not playing top tier by its BS implemented ways to have fun according to GJN
Mirror matches is the consequence since you also tried to avoid to talk about
Me personally I never want any buffs to NATO… because GJN will do something against it … like stormer HVM - they made it worse lol
Final, no fence but why TF do I care about stat and shit you are trying to research to bring out a thing so called Pattern. Since you care so much on player performance maybe you should make it a career choice like a twitter AI tag - on this forum maybe act like a bot saying this person’s stat shark is bad , pls don’t believe him.
I have a skill issue when it comes to CAS, so I can’t talk about that lol. If I win games it’s pretty much always on the ground.
I love playing aggressive in most of my NATO tanks. No need to worry about CAS when the enemy team can’t get the opportunity to spawn said CAS in opressive quantity.
Who doesn’t like to be aggressive regardless nations? They wanna make RU tank a skill check/strong trait - make NATO something equivalent to make RU mains count when they ever thinking of press W.
T80BVM 10.8% more spawns than games
T90, 8.7%
2A7V, 13.6%
SEP V2, 11.1%
PSO, 7.8%
2A6 GER, 8%
SEP, 7.6
122 B+, 10%
Type 10, 10.6%
Leclerc azur, 10%
T-72B3A, 9.9%
T-80U-E1, 17.5%
Click-Bait, 17.7%
2A4M, 18.9%
Seems to look like youre both wrong since spawn to game ratios are pretty similar overall
10.7 is so much worse than top tier, top tier is at least playable, if you play anything but russia at 10.7 you get spammed with KH29s, Vikhr and Atakas, BMPT (72)s Object 292s, T80UDs etc. etc., It’s almost unplayable, I don’t play it that often, but it is so bad that I’ve raged for the entire 10-15 matches I’ve played, with the exception of 2, and I’ve lost all but 2 of them.
I’m not the best player, (In fact I suck with the 2A4) but still, that 157 players on russia thing isn’t normal. Like 4 MiG/SU24 planes and 2 KA50s per match, it’s very annoying to say the least. Doesn’t help that the BMPT(72) should be at 12.0-12.3 and still isn’t either, constant uptiers…
Take the PUMA for example, great vehicle at 10.3-10.7, I’ve not had a good time with it, despite the fact I have had 8-11 kill matches consistently, well, not anymore! (I typically do this well at 6.3-7.7 and occasionally on top tier)
AND BEFORE YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT THE STATS AND THE FACT IM A GERMANY MAIN, THE MAJORITY OF MY NEGATIVE K/Ds IS BECAUSE I WAS WORSE BEFORE, MY USA STATS LOOK BETTER!
Because Russia team system better than NATO
Russia CAS have effective, But NATO CAS most time it 's of no use ,especially when facing Pantsir SM, When countless 900SP are ended by 90SP, you won’t want to continue this game
Often, for NATO players, 5 minutes is all it takes for the game to progress to LMUR and KH38 time.
Let me rephrase then, when US v Russia in top teir, US tends to persevere throughout in terms of people staying in the game, russia…kinda.
I’ve played on both sides and US just keeps on going, but there are likely more deaths.
Russia, It may be the same, Im unsure but it does eventually turn into less people in the russian team v US.
Now when I play 13.0 Russia, it’s more likely the enemy team is the US and Nato countries which they keep the fight going throughout the match which leads to a russian loss. (still more deaths on the US/NATO side)
So finaly took a break from WT, decided to come back in today.
FIRST match, 12.7 France against Russia => pulverized by swarms of BMPTs, first 3 russian dudes got respectively 13/10/9 kills each.
I snapped, uninstalled. This game allocates nearly 90gb of my drive for nothing. I realized if you DO NOT play Russia, you are MOST LIKELY to loose big majority of your matches.
I think I’m gonna come back once the infantry mode is released, it might be the only solution to finaly balance the game.
Like puppies who push once a blue moon ? Who have no concept of pushing and only play passively ? And even when they play passively they picked the worst possible position trying to get cheap kill and contribute nothing ?
Or people who know that the enemy team have control most of the map and their team unable to push for shit and they have to fall back and wait for the horde to rush forward ?
Yeah lmao people surely want to play aggressively , too bad Gaijin and their russian biased stopping them from doing so