I experienced quite the opposite. Russian players never leave, but my NATO bot teammates leave 5 minutes into the match.
3 Likes
I mean its quite ez for that thing to craw it way up the frontline to get some MBT kill without getting killed based on the current RU line up.
Falcon fucks everything up at its BR regardless RU or not.
I mean you could keep coping with the game “META” however you like. You can’t persuade others to cope the same way you did. The game is busted as it is right now and there are complaints for sure. Why you have to make some irrelevant noises to spin the narrative?
You do a lot more coping than him though.
But I guess that is partially to blame something external for a personal skill issue.
2 Likes
Yeah dropping nuke in equal lobby is just me coping and abusing my vehicles :) Whatever you can say
Unlike you I won’t jump into meta wagons and cry if it performing bad
META coping is real if you deny it … you just another snowflake in my eyes.
Guess you won’t play a game where both sides meet on equal grounds.
Oh no the 1.0-1.2 K/D andy got a nuke, surely that means they are a good player now.
Ironic since top tier Russia is still my least played nation at top tier. And I have spent most of the last week grinding and spading the J-15T, F-16CM, Eitan and M1296. Which are hardly meta vehicles.
Yet you are the one crying that you are struggling against top tier Russian MBTs, which are simply mid-average.
Oh I will. I also play plenty of games where I’m at a disadvantage. Since I’m decent I just know how to deal with that.
3 Likes
Kekw, crying? k bro since you only said its only me in this forums since you and other familiar names tried your best to deny so many people… in never-ending damage model clip and analysis coping its happens to all other nation… like for real you can file a separate post but also go into others post to post another clip to deny their claim. What’s your goal here is beyond me while the narrative is clear.
Oh there is plenty of people crying. However besides a couple of legitimate complaints (LDIRCM, Su-30SM2, BMPT, SM-SV) it usually turns out into skill issue whining like how top tier Russian MBTs are supposedly to strong or too difficult to deal with.
If you take the people who complain about Russian MBTs being too strong and look at their statsharks you will see an interesting pattern.
3 Likes
You can’t statshark certain ppl while overlook the existing problem then blame them on their performance. You scale them with W/R? K/D? obviously this game doesn’t let you win if you K/D is high - like 1 competent tanks kill 2-3 tanks in one death then the game is decided that’s just BS at its core.
Like I said, if people complain about the Kh38/LDIRCM/Su-30SM2/BMPT/SV-SM I won’t statshark them and overlook their point. Those are perfectly justified things to complain about.
However if someone complains about Russian MBTs being too strong or too difficult to deal with I will absolutely statshark them to get info. Russian top tier MBT complaints have been the same for years, and they almost always have the same pattern: the person complaining is usually either mid or bad at the game.
3 Likes
OK, mid & bad with passive playstyle - I assume good player should be overconfident holding W if it doesn’t workout spawn CAS/Heli and spam missiles/bomb?
Otherwise, you really love the current META gave by GJN and defend it by say others don’t follow the META hard enough like you?
Yeah people follow the META, by not playing top tier by its BS implemented ways to have fun according to GJN
Mirror matches is the consequence since you also tried to avoid to talk about
Me personally I never want any buffs to NATO… because GJN will do something against it … like stormer HVM - they made it worse lol
Final, no fence but why TF do I care about stat and shit you are trying to research to bring out a thing so called Pattern. Since you care so much on player performance maybe you should make it a career choice like a twitter AI tag - on this forum maybe act like a bot saying this person’s stat shark is bad , pls don’t believe him.
I have a skill issue when it comes to CAS, so I can’t talk about that lol. If I win games it’s pretty much always on the ground.
I love playing aggressive in most of my NATO tanks. No need to worry about CAS when the enemy team can’t get the opportunity to spawn said CAS in opressive quantity.
1 Like
Who doesn’t like to be aggressive regardless nations? They wanna make RU tank a skill check/strong trait - make NATO something equivalent to make RU mains count when they ever thinking of press W.
T80BVM 10.8% more spawns than games
T90, 8.7%
2A7V, 13.6%
SEP V2, 11.1%
PSO, 7.8%
2A6 GER, 8%
SEP, 7.6
122 B+, 10%
Type 10, 10.6%
Leclerc azur, 10%
T-72B3A, 9.9%
T-80U-E1, 17.5%
Click-Bait, 17.7%
2A4M, 18.9%
Seems to look like youre both wrong since spawn to game ratios are pretty similar overall
2 Likes
10.7 is so much worse than top tier, top tier is at least playable, if you play anything but russia at 10.7 you get spammed with KH29s, Vikhr and Atakas, BMPT (72)s Object 292s, T80UDs etc. etc., It’s almost unplayable, I don’t play it that often, but it is so bad that I’ve raged for the entire 10-15 matches I’ve played, with the exception of 2, and I’ve lost all but 2 of them.
I’m not the best player, (In fact I suck with the 2A4) but still, that 157 players on russia thing isn’t normal. Like 4 MiG/SU24 planes and 2 KA50s per match, it’s very annoying to say the least. Doesn’t help that the BMPT(72) should be at 12.0-12.3 and still isn’t either, constant uptiers…
Take the PUMA for example, great vehicle at 10.3-10.7, I’ve not had a good time with it, despite the fact I have had 8-11 kill matches consistently, well, not anymore! (I typically do this well at 6.3-7.7 and occasionally on top tier)
AND BEFORE YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT THE STATS AND THE FACT IM A GERMANY MAIN, THE MAJORITY OF MY NEGATIVE K/Ds IS BECAUSE I WAS WORSE BEFORE, MY USA STATS LOOK BETTER!
Because Russia team system better than NATO
Russia CAS have effective, But NATO CAS most time it 's of no use ,especially when facing Pantsir SM, When countless 900SP are ended by 90SP, you won’t want to continue this game
Often, for NATO players, 5 minutes is all it takes for the game to progress to LMUR and KH38 time.
We already went over how this data doesn’t show how long an average player stays in a match.
No but it shows that no nation is a lot more likely to respawn than any other which is worth a lot more than any useless anecdote
4 Likes
It mixed from what i’ve seen.
Let me rephrase then, when US v Russia in top teir, US tends to persevere throughout in terms of people staying in the game, russia…kinda.
I’ve played on both sides and US just keeps on going, but there are likely more deaths.
Russia, It may be the same, Im unsure but it does eventually turn into less people in the russian team v US.
Now when I play 13.0 Russia, it’s more likely the enemy team is the US and Nato countries which they keep the fight going throughout the match which leads to a russian loss. (still more deaths on the US/NATO side)