Didn’t say anything like that, i’ve said you chose to clips carefully among your gameplay videos to prove your 100 percent win rate claim, learn the difference please.
They don’t, that’s what i’m saying, they can also be inconsistent from time time but unlike side shots they are more consistent which i didn’t don’t complain about them that much in the first place.
Well, as long as he has ammo (yes i’ve shot a BMPT in lower side once where he had ZERO ammo, like NONE) and you don’t shoot below the tank, its 100% consistency as far as i’ve seen, unless its his side is angled down so your round just doesn’t enter the hull.
And i witnessed my rounds didn’t spalled nor create any fragments to cook off that ammo countless times.
Are we done or gonna keep avoiding the main problem about BMPT’s?
I just can’t bring myself to believe how that happens. You are probably shooting too low, or there was no ammo there.
I’ve already said ERA needs a rework.
That’s up to you.
Or the round simply didn’t do enough spalling due spaghetti code, happens on other vehicles as well which i didn’t mentioned until you brought it up.
Not just ERA overall damage model need rework alongside with volumetric on turret and belts.
No different from dying to a Falcon at 7.7
But no Russian mains whined and got it nerfed. Now this new Pantsir is doing the same and “its skill issue?”
Falcon didn’t have to deal with hordes of fully stabilized, highly mobile MBTs with great gun handling that have pixel-perfect aim.
It’s pretty ironic that NATO nations have to keep in the battle with multiple spawns to defeat russia, yet russia has people leaving early one either from solely playing in a premium vehicle or some other reason: can’t hone in on that yet.
Regardless, what I’ve observed is that NATO nations use more lives and russians use less so. Although the Russian side will constantly batter to a severe degree.
This is one of my turn offs since getting top teir vehicles, I don’t want to spent my spawns to keep the steam rolling just to be killed over and over to eventually win.
I experienced quite the opposite. Russian players never leave, but my NATO bot teammates leave 5 minutes into the match.
I mean its quite ez for that thing to craw it way up the frontline to get some MBT kill without getting killed based on the current RU line up.
Falcon fucks everything up at its BR regardless RU or not.
I mean you could keep coping with the game “META” however you like. You can’t persuade others to cope the same way you did. The game is busted as it is right now and there are complaints for sure. Why you have to make some irrelevant noises to spin the narrative?
You do a lot more coping than him though.
But I guess that is partially to blame something external for a personal skill issue.
Yeah dropping nuke in equal lobby is just me coping and abusing my vehicles :) Whatever you can say
Unlike you I won’t jump into meta wagons and cry if it performing bad
META coping is real if you deny it … you just another snowflake in my eyes.
Guess you won’t play a game where both sides meet on equal grounds.
Oh no the 1.0-1.2 K/D andy got a nuke, surely that means they are a good player now.
Ironic since top tier Russia is still my least played nation at top tier. And I have spent most of the last week grinding and spading the J-15T, F-16CM, Eitan and M1296. Which are hardly meta vehicles.
Yet you are the one crying that you are struggling against top tier Russian MBTs, which are simply mid-average.
Oh I will. I also play plenty of games where I’m at a disadvantage. Since I’m decent I just know how to deal with that.
Kekw, crying? k bro since you only said its only me in this forums since you and other familiar names tried your best to deny so many people… in never-ending damage model clip and analysis coping its happens to all other nation… like for real you can file a separate post but also go into others post to post another clip to deny their claim. What’s your goal here is beyond me while the narrative is clear.
Oh there is plenty of people crying. However besides a couple of legitimate complaints (LDIRCM, Su-30SM2, BMPT, SM-SV) it usually turns out into skill issue whining like how top tier Russian MBTs are supposedly to strong or too difficult to deal with.
If you take the people who complain about Russian MBTs being too strong and look at their statsharks you will see an interesting pattern.
You can’t statshark certain ppl while overlook the existing problem then blame them on their performance. You scale them with W/R? K/D? obviously this game doesn’t let you win if you K/D is high - like 1 competent tanks kill 2-3 tanks in one death then the game is decided that’s just BS at its core.
Like I said, if people complain about the Kh38/LDIRCM/Su-30SM2/BMPT/SV-SM I won’t statshark them and overlook their point. Those are perfectly justified things to complain about.
However if someone complains about Russian MBTs being too strong or too difficult to deal with I will absolutely statshark them to get info. Russian top tier MBT complaints have been the same for years, and they almost always have the same pattern: the person complaining is usually either mid or bad at the game.
OK, mid & bad with passive playstyle - I assume good player should be overconfident holding W if it doesn’t workout spawn CAS/Heli and spam missiles/bomb?
Otherwise, you really love the current META gave by GJN and defend it by say others don’t follow the META hard enough like you?
Yeah people follow the META, by not playing top tier by its BS implemented ways to have fun according to GJN
Mirror matches is the consequence since you also tried to avoid to talk about
Me personally I never want any buffs to NATO… because GJN will do something against it … like stormer HVM - they made it worse lol
Final, no fence but why TF do I care about stat and shit you are trying to research to bring out a thing so called Pattern. Since you care so much on player performance maybe you should make it a career choice like a twitter AI tag - on this forum maybe act like a bot saying this person’s stat shark is bad , pls don’t believe him.