Statshaming is mean and unnecessary.
@H_ngma can have valid perspectives without having to play Soviets.
His posts’ claims about people pointing out the flaws of T-Series tanks being from “USSR players” is mostly wrong.
The statements are primarily coming from players that play multiple tech trees.
Statistics are a good tool, after all, skill and statistical issues go hand in hand, and a simple screenshot proves this. It’s understandable that someone lacking skill might struggle with the game, they might think the game favors their opponent and isn’t balanced.
Just as I use German, Japanese, and French and I never had any problems with Soviet vehicles., I was even going to finish the American line, buying the M1 Clickbait along with the Mirage F1, but since a gaijin brought a premium SU-30, I had to buy the SU-30.
Whats russian winrates looking like now compared to September? Or even august.
Love how skill less players complain about russian vehicles whilst not having any, and then on top of it bring skill into the matter. PEAK
Tho i can see it from a perspective from someone who just started, and then had to learn the different style of how Ground battles play out, and if you dont play for long you will struggle to keep up or being as good as your former self. Just never bring into conversation especially when its about balancing
Maybe instead of instantly pulling up statshark you could properly read mine and your comment?
People that suffer from skill issue against T series tanks are not going to call them bad, because it would make them look even worse.
So in my experience on this forum the people calling out the big issues the T series has are people that play the ussr or as @AlvisWisla correctly said play multiple tech trees.
No but did I say anywhere that they weren’t?
Well I mean these 2 things are not mutually exclusive. Russian tanks can be bad in game and simultaneously overperform compared to real life
What does player skill have to do with this discussion?
this whole thread is about russian stuff steam rollign NATO
and if that is the case they would have a winrate far higher than 50%
I don’t need to go to StatShark; I just need to put in your in-game nickname, and it will show me everything more accurately than StatShark.
Fair, we went from answering this dude’s question of teams being more skilled to a discussion about Russian bias instead.
tbf, from the september stats the only new russian top tier vehicle had a 55% winrate while the rest is averaged with the 40 something percent they had pre update
germany and sweden have most lower wintare in much br…
completly irrelevant
Instructions unclear. Nerf Italy.
Statshark global winrates are more accurate than this website iirc.
I mean NERA should dissipate or lower the energy of a penetrating dart so less energy-> less penetration → less spall. just like every other armor reduces spall in this game since amount of spall is dependent on excess pen
I think what Luque meant is that a paper thin piece of ERA offers 200+mm of KE protection while a thicker, heavier piece of NERA offers a small fracture of that
yes, but statshark is only showing data a month old
while that site has more recent data
I didn’t do crew damage at all. Nor does the turret basket negate spall from the front plate.
So you’re actually trying to defend this? But clams Russian bias else where. What a joke.
Wdym? German NERA works pretty good.
In no way was he being mean.
He was explaining the logical thing that if they have no experience in it, how can they comment on it. It would be like me saying the IRIST is the “most op spaa in the game” meanwhile I have never used it, or have it researched it.
