Dude, do you take people for dumber than they are? You killed only 4 ground targets in the entire lifetime of you using the GR7. How can you build an argument of your experience fighting Pantsir in it when 4 kills can be done in a single game easy.
If you had 40 ground kill in the thing, okay, your ARB/GRB retort could make sense, but with only 4 ground kills, it doesn’t. Stop digging a deeper hole.
I have double your KD in most of my vehicles, going up to 2.5 in certain vehicles in which I did well, and ~3 for certain planes. Again, why lie so blatantly?
Nice way to twist it, meaning players who are benefitting or using the broken thing do not cry about it being overpowered. Which is why not a single Russian main has ever come out and said. “Yes we agree the LMUR and Kh-38 are op as hell, hope you guys get something similar.”
Instead it’s “AGM 65 is just as good as the Kh-38, Kh-38 isn’t even that good, getting killed by Kh-38 is a skill issue.”…Blah blah blah And that is the problem in a nutshell players do not want to admit that in reality those 11 kills they have are from flying a helicopter and a jet where all they have had to do is click space bar a few times and requires no discernible skill.
Any Supersonic jet that carries a Kh-38 is still great despite the new SAMS
Yes other nations are as bad like when players try to justify the Falcon is not an OP tank killer…Gepard can do the same…
It does for September however those stats are of course useless since the 64E only got added in the last week of September and the MI28NM got played the entire month. So we’d have to wait for the October stats to be sure but with Russian helis being more popular than American ones in general, Russia and the us being similarly popular in top tier and the aforementioned insane RP gap i think it’s fair to say that for now the MI28 leads in popularity
Again, you have only 4 ground kills in the damn thing. It’s not rocket science. It doesn’t matter whether you used it in ARB or GRB because in both case, you barely played the thing and did poorly all around in it. Even if you suddenly did a single perfect in it in GRB with 4 kills, how can you judge the plane performance against pantsir with a SINGLE game?
You and I both know your argument was bad and a lie.
I mostly played the Namer this month, to jump into the F-16I Sufa for easy kill and get large amount of points every game that way to farm the EFV. Thus, mostly got assists, not kills. Now, if you’re being honest and look at my global stats, you’ll quickly see this is exactly as I said compared to your global poor performance in your vehicles:
No ones twisting anything it’s quite literally what you said. You said that you do not mind it when it’s on your team, though when it’s on the opposing team you find it
No one does this, no one ever has nor ever will.
However there seems to be those that can objectively point out what is OP and what isn’t. As I stated above KA50 when it dropped actively destroyed a game mode, there is a Bias for premiums NOT for nations.
If you read the arguments it’s the fact the AGM65 is worse, but on better platforms.
What has that got to do with weapons being OP or not? have you tried to use a high BR helicopter?
I have the AH64 PATEN or whatever the old premium 11.3 was, its a headache to use unless you take ages to figure it out.
Not really Most jets, bar the aformentioned ones that I listed are absolutely hammer, with or without KH38T. The su30 is fine as it’s an actual decent platform, the Su34 is just too big and heavy to make them effective.
I think that the Strv 122A, 122B PLSS, 2A5 and 2A6 are also some of the only top tier MBTs to get their reload time nerfed due to their stomping after new power.
Yeah it’s nothing crazy really. And yeah they’re up and down cause I never wanted to bother grinding another tree to top tier. I prefer to have 1-2 trees with crew points, good lineup, and everything researched. Problem is that it left me at the mercy of the FOTM as you can imagine.
I had a K/D of 5 or so back when it was only M1 against T-64B, that number crashed during the time where Russia had the Tunguska + the Mi-35NM orbiting and farming entire teams.(That was just before USA received the ADATS). Only Germany had the Flakrak capable of shooting the Mi-35 down. So you had squads of RU players grouping up with GER players to force a matchup with no way to win for America.
Then it got better with the ADATS, and hell again during the release of the Ka-50 when you had swarms of it ripple firing their entire loadout to overwhelm your AA. There was also that time when RU helicopter could first spawn thermobaric rockets and immediately team wipe you out of spawn, leading to the RU team capping everything and spawn trapping you 1min in the game. That BS lasted for months and months too.
And so on. All of these K/Ds would probably be closer to 2/2.5 and a lot more consistent if I had more nations to jump on the meta train and avoid the pain train. I just play vehicles for fun nowadays anyway, even if they’re off meta like the Namer.
Before I go through the effort of clipping you a T-80U-E1’s side skirt eating DM53 for literally zero damage at 500m, would you bother to accept that there might be an issue or will you call me bad?
People are like television media, they simply adopt a narrative, and when another one appears that proves the opposite, they fall silent. After all, it’s only OP if it’s Russian/Soviet.
I did not call you bad lol , I say maybe get better and cope with the vehicle downside instead of “Vehicle le bad I can’t play because of X nation biased” lol. Clip whatever you want but you are talking to a person whom only play premium tank and is performing actually good in vehicle people and even yourself claimed are bad then you should really rethink how you play lol.
