They dont, i read the literal operators manual and have seen videos of a specifically HEATFS ammo blowout, and the turret bustle doesnt destroy inside the tank. If the firewall is broken, yes, but if it isnt HEATFS is perfectly safe to load. Gaijin doesnt know how blowouts work.
Nah no way. My fully broken tank with an expert full crew only took 36 secs
You don’t know what they were talking about
They’ve flagged me, tripod, Motorola, and others.
It happens.
That’s a mistake. You need to look up the jargon used in the documents and work out an understanding of what they mean.
Google’s your friend.
On top of Tripod’s post right after your’s.
There is however mounted with Vikhr’s on the inner pylons, which means all 4 store positions are wired for ATGMs. Now, whether signaling is shared or not I’m not going to claim.
The irony is if Mi-28NM was limited to 4 instead of 8, it’d be 0.3 - 0.7 BR lower than AH-64E and other F&F missile carriers after decompression.
Kh-38ML is the most powerful version.
Kh-38MT is weaker than Kh-38ML both in-game and IRL, and it’ll only get weaker in-game after LOAL is added and it’s coded correctly.
It’s currently weaker in-game because ML doesn’t require LOS to fire while MT does.
You can fire ML on a GNSS position, then pop up for the final lasing.
You can’t do that with MT.
Su-30, Su-35, and Su-27 space between the engines are the same.
2 Likes
that means exactly nothing, the two missiles are hugely different, also laser/beam riding weapons are known to need very simple wiring while IR guided ones need a lot more
doesnt matter, there is no evidence that they can use the double racks
ERA has saved Soviet tanks a total of zero times from my shots.
I guess it’s magic in that it gives the player minor comfort until their turret flies.
ERA has never eaten shots from the side. Overlapping armor, roof armor, and tracks are not ERA blocks.
Every time I see video of someone’s claim that ERA ate their round, it wasn’t the ERA but the previously mentioned sources. Though one time it was a road wheel that ate someone’s round.
The ERA doesn’t under-perform to my knowledge.
It obviously does not over-perform.
Neither of us can know that because we don’t have the documents necessary, and wouldn’t be able to share it anyway.
Also the photographs above within the spoiler clearly show double pylons on an Su-35/30 undercarriage. I cannot confirm if Su-27SM has that undercarriage IRL as well as I haven’t found a confirmed photo yet.
Here’s the Su-30SM and Su-35 undercarriages though: Su-35 has significantly larger wings which adds notably more fuel as well. About 11.5 inches each side of added wingspan.
2 Likes
yes we absolutely can know that the data transfer needed to use beam riding missiles is much simpler than what is needed for IR guided missiles with MITL controls
doesnt matter, even if they were outwardly identical it would not meet gaijins normal standards for a weapon to be added
It does meet the standard perfectly.
Photograph is and has always been one of the standards.
The photograph is of an Su-30/35 undercarriage, it explicitly shows 4x R-77s between two engines on offset double racks.
The photos of the Su-30 and Su-35 undercarriage show they are identical store positions.
The claims of Sukhoi have the avionics of Su-35 and 30SM being at least extremely similar.
That is more information available than how we got flares on F-5As, Magic 2s on the wet pylons of Mirage 2000 [that one was the most difficult proof we had to do], and many others.
Now, if you have a photo to prove/disprove Su-27SM, you’re more than welcome to share with the class. Until then, any claims about Su-27SM’s center store positions without photos are not going to help.
Don’t lie to my face man It might be an issue with volumetric or some other wild spaghetti code but ERA definitely eats kinetic shots
Alpharius… you’ve been known to say some really wild things, but this takes the cake.
They all likely use the same wiring, more so it’s the on board computers that differ.
A wire can only do 1 thing. Send power. Sure we could get into all the frequencies and waves, but at the end of the day it’s still just sending power.
It barely eats anything that isn’t HE or a very very early atgm.
Let’s see some of these shots of yours.
Also, Kontact-5 if i remember correctly is under preforming in KE protection by 20mm
Where as Relikt is under preforming by nearly 50mm.
HE protection on both appear to be accurate.
I can’t just conjure up things from the past I don’t sit and record everything
Oh I record stuff all the time. Often times it’s me playing some western tank, and getting the craziest of shots that shouldn’t have penned killing things.
As of late, it’s mostly been nuke spamming in my T58, which… is somehow still 8.3… and I almost have a 4.0 kd in it.
Yeah t58 reload should probably be nerfed a little especially for being a 155 but unfortunately this is our guide and makes their money The OP killinator 4 million just to be nerfed an update later
It’s a US tank, it won’t be nerfed for 2 years
That’s magic ain’t it? Like I’d love for you or anyone to even attempt to go and tell me how that happened.
Because somehow spall went through the roof of the loader… and killed the commander…?
Also, ignore the fact Mr. (Non aimbotting, CLEARLY) Asian guy killed me.
Yeah it doesn’t even look like it hit the ERA It looks like it hit your track and then the side armor which also underperforms at angles for all top tier tanks in the game
Lol
Tbh your amount of nations played at top tier are rookie numbers as well.
1 Like
Come to think of it I do have the Chinese one