Russian Mid-Late SPAA are too low in BR

image

I feel that the OSA-AK/AKM an Strella-10M/M2 should both be higher in BR. I feel that the Strella-10M/M2 is strong enough to be at least 10.7 if not 11.0 (Yes, it is better than the 2S6.) and the OSA-AK/AKM should very much be 10.7 due to it’s range and how fast it’s missiles are.

3 Likes

I agree with the Strela change, but the OSA is not very threatening .
From the time spent dodging them, i would say they are slightly worse than Rolands. ( With which they share the BR )

2 Likes

The issue with moving the strela up is its short range. Anything that can engage past 5km is immune to it.

Not to mention the lack of search radar.

17 Likes

On the contrary. Ive switched Roland for OSA in my lineup practically instantly because Roland after La Royale is abysmal; its useless against planes and good enough for hitting stationary helicopters. Roland could drop to 10.0 and it would still be mid.

OSA missiles are much better overall, but it has large deadzone due to how launchers are positioned and turret rotates slowly so it struggles to both react to and intercept certain targets.

1 Like

The Strela started at 9.3 and jumped all the way to 10.3, don’t need to nerf that SAM no more. Will just be as bad as the 11.7br Type 81 C SAM which currently sits in a spot where it can barley reach its targets.
OSA is fine at 10.3, that thing slow in mobility and slow to react to threats. Missile is great though, better than the Rolands.

6 Likes

Strela is pretty much useless against anything that can sling off ordnance past 5km. Planes can also much easier sneak up on it as it doesn’t even have thermals or a radar. Destroying ordnance is also out of the question.

At 10.7/11.0 it would get mauled by IR Mavericks, so demanding a BR increase makes no sense.

9 Likes

How so?
Its a bit faster pull harder and more range

Hell no.

Wrong.

It’s not.

Only thing strela has over tunguska is that missiles are “FNF”.

Tunguska has:
-TVD
-longer range
-Radar
-tracking
-guns
-mobility.

Yep. Both are 10.3, at the same BR where the Rolands are. They are not like the Tunguska but they can both go to 10.7 comfortably

1 Like

Why exactly? You haven’t even played them.

In that case apparently all the OSAs i ran into are complete and utter rocks at playing the game , i have yet to be downed by one.

Remember that strela used to be 9.3

Due to CAS mains cried so hard that the plumber sent an invoice, now it’s 10.3 soon to be 10.7.

1 Like

do you even have a Roland platform?

No, but we have stats, you know? and they are much more lethal than the poor Roland

So the Roland should be buffed or moved down in BR.

Of course CASoids think otherwise as they hate the idea of an effective SPAA (available to both Germany and the UK also).

1 Like

Or yes. pretty useless against anything than a heli. Even drones can outrange it

Considering most of the osa players are germany or russian mains then yes it makes sanse thwy dint knkw what they are doing
Now the osa is even better with the radar screen mode

Leave them where they are. As a British main they’re the only effective SPAA I have to use against the CAS cancer that prevails at this BR.

1 Like

I do . The average player is simply too … how should i put this - unexperienced to dodge it .