And that target can move, cover or pop smoke due the things that are happening in the ground so what missile has more probabilities to kill?
Any missile, cause if they pop a smoke and move they can still be far enough from the Kh-38 to overpressure it
FnF like PARS and Spike is really good at SEAD though because of shorter exposure time to SPAA. Conditionally that means a non-attentive SPAA which is more likely to happen anyways
True, but that doesen’t really matter if they get intercepted anyway. And planes are still a factor, and the eurocopter isn’t really as good at a2a as its competitors, as it has no chin mounted cannon and the stingers… well, they’re stingers.
Lol still possible even what you are saying.
Lets make an experiment @AlvisWisla and @Anonymous4245
Each one play 10 matches of Ground top tier (12.0) then we count what air carried weapon get more kills.
Fk that, I ain’t touching ground until new SPAAs gets added. or ARH gets SP cost buff
I’m not spending 1000 SP for something objectively worse for the team than bringing 3 more tanks.
There is no need for that, just play 10 matches in top tier and then we count what air carried weapon get more kills in total.
does SRE count cause I have seen more kills with Hammers and Brimstones
That’s unscientific and would prove nothing.
You have 32 variables in a match x3 matches where you have one F-15E, one Rafale, and one Su-34 [the Su-30SM is worse than the 34 for ordnance], and then those players will have different skill levels.
That’s 32 x 3 -2 for the extra times you’re in the match.
94 variables, and that’s before you multiply for combinations of variables.
Literally thousands of variables…
The results objectively prove nothing.
Of course.
It shouldn’t cause it’s a biased sample set. Because no one takes Su-34 there (Su-30 got added later in the season)
That is why im telling you 2 to do it also, to open the sample.
Dude you are just getting deeper in the rabbit hole you made, if you can´t prove what you say why to maintain it?
It isn´t because we are counting kills from any kind of CAS in ground battles, I am not saying that cas isn´t a problem, I am saying that adding the best A2G missile to the nation who has the best AA makes the things worse and that is biased.
That’s just even more variables and even less scientific.
Also I’ve already proven that IR AGMs are OP.
The only scientific test you can do is SPAA vs CAS, and spoiler top CAS always wins with 0 deaths.
The ONLY time CAS ties with Pantsir is when it’s GBU CAS vs Pantsir, where deaths tend to equalize between the two.
Then you have no idea how in SRE where SPAA is even more outclassed by Squads with higher skill floors than the average pubbies. Where the match is decided by who wins the air battle at the start of the match.
Becuase if you want samples from those, then Hammer and Brimstones would give me a biased number cause people only bring EFTs and Rafales there. It’s literally a biased sample set
Bro cmon, you are just excusing yourself with “that´s unscientific” to not prove your point.
When? hahahahaha
You are right top squads use more rafales and Ef´s (also this season the su30 weren´t available and in squad battles planes spawn in the airfield, not in the air) also, dont get me wrong, I think a rafale is by far a better plane, but with the air spawn of ground rb and the speed of kh-38´s there…
Then we don´t count squad battles and just count ground battles where is the real problem. Deal?
I mean I’m still not touching GRB solo with a 10 foot pole until better SPAA or CAP becomes cheaper (whichever comes first), I’d rather grind the German Air tree
Boooooooooh, well, I´m going to do 20 matches then, even if it is “unscientific” hahaha.
Wait for the results (pray for me)