That isn’t bias. That is simply where those mbts should be placed in the ground battle rating system. Like other people have said, you quite obviously chose your br spread to fit your narrative, so there is that. And just because a nation has that many mbts in a br range does not mean that they are good at all, nor is it proof of bias. Russia has all those mbt’s that differ to varying degrees from each other. None of them are very similar in terms of capability and they all have their own place in lineups.
The 5.7 t-34-85 is the best or second best 5.7 in game, depending on who you ask. What does it struggle with that makes you say it’s bad?
Idk , maybe a Panther or Tiger or something. It is not like Panther, which is 0.3 br above it can just casually UFP the T34-85 right ?
1 Like
I hey, I have a better lineup in France. ;)
I’ve played plenty of other nations, and Russian tanks I treat as guaranteed eliminations. Want to have a scary bias in game, check Germany and how this game favours German tanks. Check American planes if you want to know bias in air. Seriously, AIM 120s are far better than any Russian missile. AIM 9Ms are far superior than the R-73s
2 Likes
Thats bcuz u know where to aim but overall t72 has the advantge cuz u are paper anywhere
I feel like its not about USSR having every best vehicle in its role possible, but its more about a balanced approach. It has pretty dominant or at least competitive vehicles in every role. The mbts are fine and pretty competitive, best AA, really good cas and usable support vehicle.
TBH I feel like other nations always lack something.
German lacks in cas power, they simply don’t have a good strike aircraft
US has good Air to air combat with light tank but their mbts are quite fragile with a somewhat lacking AA.
Brits have good cas options but the ground part is just not a good fit.
Italy has best light tanks with L2A7, but Otomatic in top tier is just a joke.
Chinese has OK mbts and viable light tank now VT5 is here, Heli is fine, but most of their cas is consisted of laser guided bombs which are far inferior.
France has a really good lineup with pretty much all u need, but has no good light tanks with fragile mbts. Rafale being the best plane in game rn, but Mirage 2k RMV is not as good as Su34.
Sweden with the strongest ground line up possible with literally no cas power.
Israel has good mbt and light tanks, good cas power and no AA.
4 Likes
I want to emphasize again Rus bias is KH38 and pantsir .
Their gap with similar vehicles in other countries is much larger than that of Leopard 2A7 or AIM120
1 Like
My Russian lineup wins 63 percent at top tier.
My American lineup wins 39 percent at top tier.
My German lineup wins 68 percent at top tier.
My Israeli lineup wins 44 percent at top tier.
Are you noticing a pattern? Germany and Russia completely dominate. You’re speaking nonsense and chose the wrong person to “fact check” by lying with statistics and sources that don’t properly show performance.
There’s a reason raw KD isn’t a measurement of a player’s skill. I hope you can realize that.
1 Like
Kh-38 is a AGM. Wow, so scary. You totally cannot defeat it using a Tor or by shooting a smoke grenade out.
Leopards are over powered, Tigers are overpowered at their Bars, German tanks are way too good for a country that lost the war. Panthers we’re breaking down every other kilometre. Tigers couldn’t drive over an ant hill without breaking down. Yet somehow they are the most powerful tanks of low to mid tiers. The only BR Germany is not broken are the Bars they are not in.
Oh, and let’s not get into how broken AIM 120s are. But let me guess, you’re going to say the R-77-1s have longer range, despite the fact they couldn’t track a whale in a clear aquarium.
1 Like
Russia doesn’t have light tanks at top tier, so I guess that beats out your whole, “blank doesn’t have good light tanks”
1 Like
Thanks for admitting that there’s no Russian bias.
Pantsir can’t frag any meta CAS at this time, and Kh-38 is as OP in ground battles as all other AGMs.
1 Like
Doesn’t sound like that
They are not 100% accurate but not that inaccurate, as you try to present it
Not really
One single good game =/= being good in all games
Ok? Assists, win rates and base captures are not the topic of the conversation.
Ok?
It literally does not have anything to do with your original claim.
You claimed, that you have 2.0 K/D in T-90M. I have checked it, and you do not have it.
Not really
I’ve chosen perfect person to fact check, because you’ve been caught red handed.
Overall performance have nothing to do with it
Nobody says that it is
AS PER MY LAST POST
You said you have 2.0 KD in T-90M. But in fact you do not. And it is not even “almost 2.0”, it is not “1.8” or somthing like that. It is ~1.3.
This, just this.
When you say lost the war .Your bias is already unfair to Germany
1 Like
To clear everything, as it seems like you got really defensive here:
I do not claim you are bad or something. I do not claim you don’t know how to play or how to use specific tank.
That being said:
I am just curious, why would you say this:
Why say this if it is not true?
1 Like
Yeah, my bias is unfair since I play Britain with Solid Shot at 4.3 and constantly fighting Tiger Es.
1 Like
Tell me How do I know if KH38 is coming to release smoke???Can you know in advance? Can I assume that there is something unclean on your computer？？？
1 Like
What??? the low Tiger on 5.7 BR Have you really played games before?
Laser warning, pops up for me, so I smoke.
1 Like
Yes, and I’ve fought Tigers in a Concept 3.
1 Like