Russian Bias: Raw MBT access in the 9.7-10.3BR region

I haven’t mained Russia in a hot minute. In the past 2 months, my 20th most played vehicle is Russian, with the next one being 29th.

1 Like

I do however have the M1A1, which does fight top tier a bit. Even in a 12.0 lobby the M1A1 is still extremely strong.
You also have 1 Rank 8 vehicle that isn’t American, being the T 80 U (Sweden), so should I throw your argument right back at you?

3 Likes

if you wanna go into nations having a ton of vehicles in some particular BR range, then let me bring up some examples…

USA: 7 very potent medium and heavy tanks in the 5.0 - 5.7 BR range, 9(!!!) MBTs in the 11.3 - 12.0 range
Germany: 6 potent medium and heavy tanks in the 3.3 - 3.7 range, 6 Leopard tanks in the 11.7 - 12.0 range
UK: 7 Challengers in the 11.7 - 12.0 range
Japan: 4 of the best MBTs at 11.3
China: 4 potent MBTs at 11.0
France: 4 extremely strong medium and heavy tanks at 7.7, 6 MBTs at 12.0
Sweden: 4 strong MBTs in the 11.3 - 12.0 range
Israel: 5 MBTs at 8.7, 8(!!!) MBTs in the 9.0 - 9.3 range, 6 MBTs in the 11.3 - 12.0 range

All of that without even bringing up light tanks, which gives nations like Italy, Japan, Sweden or France the strongest lineups in the game. By your logic, Gaijin has a bias towards ISRAEL, not USSR. Your argument is extremely flawed in many ways, which might be explained by the fact you’re not positive in any of your tanks.

2 Likes

Crazy how people nitpick something they hate and start complaining without looking into the matter any further

1 Like

If you had look further and stop cherry-picking, I also have NATO’s vehicles that have similar KD as the Object 279 lol why does he need to have a sep v2 to prove a point? when your M1 Abrams also barely hit 1 kd, maybe I should also pick a random vehicle just to say you are not relevant since you don’t even play one of the Challenger or Merkavas so your opinion doesn’t matter, do you realize how ridiculous it sounds lol?

1 Like

Big boy talk for someone that also doesn’t play them lol

That brother was tryna play it off as if M1A1 is easier to “do well”

Meanwhile his M1A1:

0.9KD

Another day of USA mains clinging to🗑️arguments like its life support as they continue to throw shit at walls to see what sticks loooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

2 Likes

The M1A1 and M1A2 SEP are not really comparable, the M1A1 is very OP and the SEP is practically a marginally better version with the better thermals and cheek armor that’s an entire BR higher.

But the cheek armor doesn’t really matter because your weak spots are the same on both variants. It’s like putting the Olifant Mk.1A and the Sho’t Kal Dalet an entire BR apart.

Oh and the M1A1 faces things like T-72Bs or Type 96s, the M1A2 doesn’t (under normal matchmaker)

I did pair the IPM1 and F/A-18C (Early) together at 12.3 for a few matches, it did fine tbh.

The only nation you play is the US. These are all your non-US vehicles.

You can keep coping on a third party stat-tracking website, as well as keep coping because I’m not biting into your bait garbage arguments.

Cute flag. Proves you’re coping AND seething.

IvanBoos have zero credit to begin with, which is why I don’t pay them much mind at all. Let them cope and seethe all they want. It amuses me.

Cute flag. Only proves me right.

If you’re going to try and pull up counter-arguments against me at least be coherent. You’re all over the place and so your argument has zero substance. Reform it and try again because as it currently is now, it’s not worth actually responding to.

Cute flag.

You know it amazes me how much of an ego you have. I’m not going to insult you because i’m afraid that would hurt it.

As for the whole “keep coping”, you do realize its you coping right? Look at this whole thread, its you whining about mediocre MBTs around the 10.3 range.

4 Likes

I have just enough ego to deal with the egotism of IvanBoos here in the forums. No more, no less. If that hurts your feelings, well, that’s just too bad for you.

Whining, you say? If you consider pointing out obvious bias where it lies in the game as whining then your definition of whining is both objectively and subjectively dogwater and I suggest you pick up a dictionary and relearn what the word means.

Cute flag. Keep coping.

Keep coping 😴

3 Likes

K buddy. You can keep coping till it lays you 6 feet under.

What makes Russia 9.7-10.3 more worthy of being talked about in bias discussions? Why can’t other nations be talked about in the same way because they have alot of vehicles in a certain BR range?

I’d copy and paste exactly what you said in your first post, but that would take too long to change to all other nations.

Is anyone who plays Russia one of those?

I genuinely have no idea why this is even a topic worth discussing. Some nations have more stuff at some BRs than others, this isn’t unique to Russia.

3 Likes

Point out where my coping was :)
Most of what I said here was just responding to your claims.

1 Like

You can point to a bunch of other BRs where nations have more tanks than others - it doesn’t mean there’s bias towards that nation.

Britain has a lot of vehicles between 8.3-8.7 (12) does that mean there’s British bias? Britain is my most played TT and I can say for a fact no. The lineup is great but you have to also examine all the vehicles individually to see if they are OP. In this (Britain’s) case, the vehicles are good but not OP.

4 Likes