Yeah. Bout the only time I wish Gaijin would’ve just refused to listen to the playerbase and implement a new mechanic since it would’ve actually improved overall game health.
Undermine your own arguments, you talk about ‘bad position’ than why cant you abuse NATO -10? is it your fault you never use good position?
That and reverse is everything, if 2 people rush you and you have -4kph you cannot escape, be it on a short corner on a city block or other… unless you say a good position is camping at the back, which goes against your hold W doctrine.
You have literally never played like 90% of the tanks you write about and the ones you have, very poorly, so why should we be soaking up your wisdom?
Yet not good enough to be 10.7, far worse tank than any 10.7 that exists currently
Refer to above
neat! the one upside!
Sure? Russia gets this round at 9.3 btw. It’s nothing special. You are exaggerating how good mango is, especially relative to the platforms that use it.
So… what most other MBTs get? That don’t get MG3s?
Try comparing them buddy. Directly.
You don’t want to go that route looking at your stats.
Isn’t APHE present in majority of nations ?
Russian APHE typically has a lot more explosive filler than other nations.
If they were about to nerf APHE’s sphere of death, then nations with smaller filler sizes should complain more in theory, as it’s carrying them more.
yes, but ussr primarily utilizes it more than anybody else
Yes, they phase out APHE later than anyone else, but in general most nations that aren’t France or UK would be fairly equally affected, especially at tiers where APHE is the main round.
Oh boi it my boi GNDM Panzer.
If only their mobility limited to the reverse speed
Yeah because playing multiple nation give you a boarder view of all nation, instead of playing a few then complain about stuff that you haven’t played then complain about your own skill issue by blaming the russian tank OP while all other tank are poopy chungus lowest tier
So true besties , RU/USSR clearly best nation all other can suck it and die
I thought he just leaved it and him, woke up and started all over again.
Nvm it got flagged as usual, didn’t even say anything offensive.
Would be good if that “green” UFP wasn’t an auto bounce on those tanks, with only the driver’s port being a weakspot.
Hey, don’t bully him. He’s just sad that Germany isn’t some wunderbar panzer machine that can destroy everything it looks at, just as advertised.
What I’m talking about is Russian equipment. In this game, there are no weak vehicles that carry the flag of the Russian Federation.
lol T-80BVM has equals in other tech trees that are 11.3 and 11.7.
Su-30SM is slightly below that of F-15 in STR and superior in general pull.
Mig-29 has equals in other tech trees at 12.3.
Your Kool-Aid consumption be high.
And all of USSR’s OP vehicles are the same exact BR as other tech trees’ OP vehicles.
Well, considering the Soviet MBTs also moved up in BR (except for the T-64BV, which would be rather inferior to any 10.0 in the game, and doesn’t have much of a lineup either), I believe this is fair. The T-72Bs aren’t that good, they are fine at 10.0-10.3 in my eyes. TURMS is a little undertiered, but not as much as the Leo 2K or the KPz-70, and the only real problem is the T-80UD, which should go to 10.7 now.
Just a friendly reminder: MBT-70 (USA) and KPz-70 (Germany) are at the same BR, and are essentially the same vehicle, except the KPz has a much faster reload. Much bias here.
Your reply perfectly proves the point of the title of this post, but your opinion is not supported by any strong evidence. Let the world see your antics.
[quote=“AlvisWisla, post:232, topic:221357”]
lol T-80BVM has equivalents in other tech trees at 11.3 and 11.7.
[quote]
Your point of view is actually laughable; it is purely a delusion that is disconnected from the actual situation. If you want to prove your point, you need to provide strong, unbiased evidence——other trees in 11.3 or 11.7
USA: M1A1 HC and M1A1 AIM, and the HC fires the best MBT round in the game.
Germany: 2A4M and 2PL.
China: MBT-2000, equally protective turret [not at all].
Armor, mobility, and/or ammo.
You can call my defense of NATO “antics” but all your post does is push a rather poor defense of Russian equipment.
France seems to be the outlier where their M1A1 equivalent tank is 12.0.
So yeah, keep glazing Russia, I’ll keep fragging T-series tanks with my under-BR’d tanks in USA.